On 11/29/2010 10:40 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2010 05:40:41 pm brett mm wrote:
>> In reality, I am not at all sure that a quantum leap in complexity
>> adds to security at all. Any proper use of old-school group
>> permissions can give as finely-grained a security policy as you would
>> like.
>
> No, it won't.
>
> Suppose I'm running CentOS on a workstation, and have a need to access a
> corporate webapp written in Flash, read corporate documents in PDF, and use
> other applications written in Java. So I'm going to be living in my browser
> for most things corporate.
>
> How can I prevent a compromised PDF from gaining an attacker access to my
> entire home directory? More to the point, how to I prevent that PDF from
> gaining WRITE access to files in my home directory (say, .bashrc for
> instance)?
If you don't trust your software, run it under a uid that doesn't have
write access to anything important - or in a VM or a different machine
for that matter. X has no problem displaying programs running with
different uids or locations.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
