Re: [CentOS] where to download CENTOS 5.5 DVD version??

2010-06-14 Thread J.Witvliet
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Marcelo M. Garcia Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 6:40 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] where to download CENTOS 5.5 DVD version?? Miguel Medalha wrote: > ISOs here: > > http

Re: [CentOS] where to download CENTOS 5.5 DVD version??

2010-06-14 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of mcclnx mcc > Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:08 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] where to download CENTOS 5.5 DVD version?? > > I want to CENTOS download side and tried to

[CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread mattias jonsson
Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
simply... no On 06/14/2010 04:28 PM, mattias jonsson wrote: > Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > __

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread Morten P.D. Stevens
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of mattias jonsson > > Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 This is a big security risk because the CentOS team is only supporting the latest CentOS version. (5.5, 4.8 and so on) __

[CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Alan McKay
Hey folks, I posted this as part of another old thread but am starting a new thread for it because I got no response. I've also since found the nfdump mailing list but it seems to be dead. I was not able to find either of these guys in a CentOS repository anywhere, so I'm building them manually.

Re: [CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Tim Shubitz
On Jun 14, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Alan McKay wrote: > And I do not seem to be able to tell configure how to find it. > These all fail : > ./configure --enable-nfprofile --with-rrdpath=/usr/lib > ./configure --enable-nfprofile --with-rrdpath=/usr > ./configure --enable-nfprofile --with-rrdpath=.. > ./c

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/6/14 Juergen Gotteswinter : > simply... no why, not? just take backup and then just reinstall 5.0 :) -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread John R Pierce
mattias jonsson wrote: > Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 > you want to uninstall 3+ years worth of fixed, patches, and security updates?? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2010 10:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > mattias jonsson wrote: >> Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 >> > > you want to uninstall 3+ years worth of fixed, patches, and security > updates?? A better question would be 'why'. Did something break because of those updates? If so, there's p

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread m . roth
Mike wrote: > On 6/14/2010 10:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> mattias jonsson wrote: >>> Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 >>> >> >> you want to uninstall 3+ years worth of fixed, patches, and security >> updates?? > > A better question would be 'why'. Did something break because of those > up

Re: [CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Alan McKay
THanks for the quick response - I think i tried that early on just out of habit (always try something with -devel ending) but it did not find anything so I figured there was no such thing. But sounds like I just have to figure out what repo I'm missing. [r...@rcadmin:~]# yum --enablerepo=* -y ins

Re: [CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Whit Blauvelt
rpmforge has it. For instance # yum list | grep rrd ... rrdtool-devel.x86_64 1.4.3-3.el5.rfrpmforge ... - Whit ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Alan McKay
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > rpmforge has it. For instance yeah, just found it in dag too works now - thanks all! -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food" _

Re: [CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Alan McKay
Crap. Another roadblock. [r...@rcadmin:~/nf/nfsen-1.3.3]# ./install.pl etc/nfsen.conf Check for required Perl modules: All modules found. RRD version '1.4003' not yet supported! [r...@rcadmin:~/nf/nfsen-1.3.3]# grep -i rrd README - RRDtools NfSen requires the RRD tools v1.0.x or > 1.2.11, at

Re: [CentOS] problems building nfdump / nfsen

2010-06-14 Thread Alan McKay
So I went weeding through the install.pl to see if I could just disable this check, and found the error message below is being produced by this if clause : my $rrd_version = $RRDs::VERSION; die "Can't find out which version of RRD you are using!\n" unless defined $rrd_version; $NfConf::RRDoffset

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 & gspca

2010-06-14 Thread m . roth
> On 06/11/2010 10:38 PM, JohnS wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >>> Kernel. gspcs is a module, used by the motion daemon. >> >> Quick Search found this for el5. You could get the src rpm and rebuild >> it for all machines. Or test a binary out first wit

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:28:58 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 Probably not. Why would you want to? > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 & gspca

2010-06-14 Thread Ned Slider
On 14/06/10 18:58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> The standalone gspca code is old and deprecated. It's now maintained as >> part of the Video4Linux v4l-dvb tree here: >> >> http://linuxtv.org/ > > Thanks. However, that's not an overly friendly site for non-project > developers - don't see any curre

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 & gspca

2010-06-14 Thread m . roth
> On 14/06/10 18:58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >>> The standalone gspca code is old and deprecated. It's now maintained as >>> part of the Video4Linux v4l-dvb tree here: >>> >>> http://linuxtv.org/ >> >> Thanks. However, that's not an overly friendly site for non-project >> developers - don't see

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread mattias jonsson
Or Enter the 5.0 repo? -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Eero Volotinen Skickat: den 14 juni 2010 17:04 Till: CentOS mailing list Ämne: Re: [CentOS] downgrade 2010/6/14 Juergen Gotteswinter : > simply... no why, not? just ta

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 & gspca

2010-06-14 Thread Ned Slider
On 14/06/10 20:24, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I have absolutely no intention of taking the latest snapshot. Did you just > skim over the last sentence I wrote, above? I don't need anything LATEST > AND GREATEST, I just want something ->STABLE<- that will run the bloody > old Labtech (Labtek?) came

Re: [CentOS] was, 5.5 & gspca, is software development

2010-06-14 Thread m . roth
Ned wrote: > On 14/06/10 20:24, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> By the way, what is "rolling development"? Does this mean that there are >> *no* releases, or version numbers? If so, how can I tell what was the >> last stable version, and what is where they started adding features for >> the next rel

[CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Whit Blauvelt
Hi, Trying to follow the recipe at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Cacti_on_CentOS_4.x Which has a bit of an update for 5.x, but no joy. Anyone know what this from Cacti should suggest? Data Query Debug Information + Running data query [9]. + Found type = '6 '[script query]. + Found data query

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to follow the recipe at > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Cacti_on_CentOS_4.x > > Which has a bit of an update for 5.x, but no joy. > > Anyone know what this from Cacti should suggest? > > Data Query Debug Information > + Runn

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Detlef Peeters
Am 14.06.2010 22:29, schrieb Whit Blauvelt: > The problem is that's returning no information to Cacti to any of the SNMP > queries. > > My whole goal here is to get something working to graph CPU core use on a > handful of systems. > > Or is there a better tool than Cacti (or better documented

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2010 3:29 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to follow the recipe at > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Cacti_on_CentOS_4.x > > Which has a bit of an update for 5.x, but no joy. > > Anyone know what this from Cacti should suggest? > > Data Query Debug Information > + Running data quer

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 04:38:17PM -0400, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: >I don't have an exact answer for you but you may find this tutorial >useful. >http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Cacti_on_CentOS_5 Thanks. That summarizes nicely the steps I've taken. It's a bit better put

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 04:38:17PM -0400, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: > > >I don't have an exact answer for you but you may find this tutorial > >useful. > >http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Cacti_on_CentOS_5 > > Thanks

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:41:06PM +0200, Detlef Peeters wrote: > You can try Munin for this. Thanks. Hadn't look at that. A lively project in current development - always good. Can't find anything about whether it can specifically graph separate CPU core use - guess I'll have to install it and s

[CentOS] libcucul.so.0 is needed by package xine-0.99.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)

2010-06-14 Thread Ed Westphal
I'm getting the following dependency problem. Please advise how to resolve. Running 5.5 with latest kernel and all updates. Tried getting this one to update and can't - what am I missing? 18:02:57 : Packages to update 18:02:57 : ---> libcaca-0.99-0.1.beta17.el5.rf.i386 18:02:57 : Preparing for i

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:55:10PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > I happen to like OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org) but it is considerably > more complicated than cacti to set up. Thanks. I don't mind complicated if the documentation is clear. Cacti is in that fuzzy area where it's not quite simp

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread klank
OpenNMS Supports Multi Core CPUs http://demo.observernms.org/device/6/health/processors/ -klank On 6/14/2010 3:20 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:55:10PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > >> I happen to like OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org) but it is considerably >> more

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread klank
Opps. It's http://www.observernms.org/ that supports Multi-Core CPUs. Don't think it will help you out since you are using nagios anyways. As a side note in the past I have searched for snmp polling and graphings of multi core, but was never able to make anything work. Let the list know if yo

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On 6/14/2010 5:20 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:55:10PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> I happen to like OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org) but it is considerably >> more complicated than cacti to set up. > > Thanks. I don't mind complicated if the documentation is clear. Cact

Re: [CentOS] Cacti/snmp question

2010-06-14 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:46:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > The big difference is that OpenNMS typically needs no agent or per-host > configuration because it works with snmp and auto-discovery of most > services - and it handles routers/switches as well has hosts. Getting off my topic, bu

[CentOS] Dual personality Server (network pass through)

2010-06-14 Thread Robert Arkiletian
I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) provide dhcp and nfs services to an internal subnet via a dedicated switch. The other nic (eth0) connects to an external WAN switch to provide net access to the systems in the subnet. --- eth1 WAN sw

Re: [CentOS] Dual personality Server (network pass through)

2010-06-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/6/15 Robert Arkiletian : > I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) > provide dhcp and nfs services to an internal subnet via a dedicated > switch. The other nic (eth0) connects to an external WAN switch to > provide net access to the systems in the subnet. > >      

[CentOS] geany 0.19 rpms

2010-06-14 Thread Frank Cox
For anyone who's interested, I have posted Centos rpms for the latest version (0.19) of the Geany programmer's editor here: http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/el5/index.html i386,x86_64 and src.rpm are all there. If you're a programmer and haven't tried geany yet, do yourself a favour and t

Re: [CentOS] Dual personality Server (network pass through)

2010-06-14 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Monday, June 14, 2010, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) > Is it possible to disable the NATing, nfs, dhcp and just somehow > bridge the external WAN nic to the internal ones such that it's just a > pass through? Basically having the

Re: [CentOS] libcucul.so.0 is needed by package xine-0.99.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)

2010-06-14 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>18:03:00 : --> Finished Dependency Resolution >18:03:00 : xine-0.99.5-1.el5.rf.i386 from installed has depsolving problems >18:03:00 : --> Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 is needed by package >xine-0.99.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed) >18:03:06 : Error in Dependency Resolution >18:03:06 : Missing

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Update error

2010-06-14 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
You can see this too if you come from FC6 or FC7 and upgrade to 64 at the same time. This is for SOME packages a DOWNGRADE, so it keeps the i386 ... then at a later stage if you want to upgrade you get the problem above. JObst On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:52:35PM -0700, John R Pierce (pie...@h

[CentOS] Disable sendmail and configure mailx to use an external Postfix server?

2010-06-14 Thread Dan Burkland
Is there anyway I can disable sendmail on my various machines and configure mailx on them to utilize my Postfix SMTP server? Thanks, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Dual personality Server (network pass through)

2010-06-14 Thread Robert Arkiletian
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote: > On Monday, June 14, 2010, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >> I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) >> Is it possible to disable the NATing, nfs, dhcp and just somehow >> bridge the external WAN nic to the internal ones

Re: [CentOS] Disable sendmail and configure mailx to use an external Postfix server?

2010-06-14 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 15/06/10 12:50, Dan Burkland wrote: > Is there anyway I can disable sendmail on my various machines and > configure mailx on them to utilize my Postfix SMTP server? ssmtp may do what you want Kal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

Re: [CentOS] Disable sendmail and configure mailx to use an external Postfix server?

2010-06-14 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 15.06.2010 04:50, schrieb Dan Burkland: > Is there anyway I can disable sendmail on my various machines and configure > mailx on them to utilize my Postfix SMTP server? > > Thanks, > > Dan Install "ssmtp" from EPEL and run `alternatives --config mta' to change from sendmail to ssmtp. That p

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

2010-06-14 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
thats a reinstall, not a downgrade at all On 06/14/2010 05:03 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/6/14 Juergen Gotteswinter : >> simply... no > > why, not? just take backup and then just reinstall 5.0 :) > > -- > Eero > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@