From: Whit Blauvelt
> "service smb restart" - does NOT get smbd running (although
> shows "OK")
> "sh /etc/init.d/smb restart" - DOES get smbd running
> "/etc/init.d/smb restart" - does NOT get smbd running (although shows
> "OK")
> "bash /etc/init.d/smb restart" - DOES get smbd running
What's
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:17:10PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>> Have you looked in /var/log/messages for errors from smbd? I don't
>> remember seeing that anywhere in your T/S list.
>
> Yup. I've grepped all the logs. Nothing from smbd a
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>> I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
>> system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the caching
>> nameserver package installed. My ISP's nameservers are there. It must have
>> so
Hi all,
I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience with this? Or
is it possible? :) We're using hotswap AXX6DRV3G for 6 SATA disks
Keith Keller wrote, On 05/21/2010 12:13 AM:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>> I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
>> system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the caching
>> nameserver package installed. My ISP
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>>> I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
>>> system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the
>>> caching nameserver package installed. My ISP's nameservers are there. It
>>> must ha
Jakub wrote:
>
> I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
> for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
> one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience with this?
> Or is it possible? :) We're using hotswap AXX6DRV3G for
On May 20, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've got a fresh CentOS 5.4 box, and the only glitch so far is that
> /etc/init.d/smb doesn't start smbd. It claims it does - shows "[ok]"
> - but
> only nmbd ends up running. Even setting a higher debugging level in
> the smbd
> fl
At Fri, 21 May 2010 15:38:44 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
> for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
> one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experie
On 5/21/2010 8:38 AM, Jakub Jedelský wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and
> system for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with
> adding new one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience
> with this? Or is it possi
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
> that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough experimentation, I
> have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
>
> Using fdisk, partition your key: one partition, VFAT (type b, an
On 5/20/2010 6:43 PM, Hans-Ulrich Flueck wrote:
> Hello TIA
>
> If you do not have a local/LAN DNS server neither a caching DNS
> configuration on your machine, I can't see a reason to add localhost to the
> list of your DNS servers...
The usual reason is that you want caching and you may have add
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
>
> If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not bind.
Nope. Not sure that would explain why a slight difference in how it's
invoked, through the same init.d script,
On 5/13/2010 1:42 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/5/13 Les Mikesell:
>> Has anything changed in updates that would affect md raid1 resync speed?
>> I regularly swap a 750G drive and resync to keep an offsite copy and
>> haven't paid enough attention to known when things changed but it seems
>> t
On 05/21/2010 09:41 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the
system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the
caching nameserver package instal
> Not sure what you're supposed to echo, there. I learned,
> where I'm working now, to use scsi-rescan-bus, which seems to work.
>
> > Using CentOS 5.5, x86_64.
> >
> > Thanks for your ideas and replies ... and excuse my english
> please :)
>
> There's nothing to excuse - it's better than som
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
>> that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough experimentation,
>> I have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
>>
>> Using fdisk, partition your key: one partition, VFAT (typ
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
>>> that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough experimentation,
>>> I have a working install on a USB key. The procedure is:
>>>
>>> Using fdisk, partit
On 5/21/2010 9:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
>>
>> If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not bind.
>
> Nope. Not sure that would explain why a slight difference in
Boweie wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Bowie wrote:
>>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough
experimentation,
I have a working install on a USB key. The proc
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Boweie wrote:
>
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Bowie wrote:
>>>
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web page,
> that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough
On May 21, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
>>
>> If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not
>> bind.
>
> Nope. Not sure that would explain why a sligh
On May 21, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> On 5/21/2010 9:44 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>>> By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
>>>
>>> If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not
>>> bin
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
> invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
> you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh interpreter specified in the script
> itself. Is
On 5/21/2010 10:56 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
>> invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
>> you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh in
I've got two pendrives.
I want to install a Debian on them. RAID1.
Ok...
...
After I installed it in RAID1, it works perfectly, ok! :)
When I pull out one of the pendrive [good pendrive], it still boots up,
hurrah :)
But: ...
When I pull out the other pendrive [i plug in the first one i trie
Jozsi Vadkan wrote on 05/21/2010 12:29 PM:
> I've got two pendrives.
>
> I want to install a Debian on them. RAID1.
This is the CentOS list.
...
> I already tried:
> grub-install /dev/sdc <-that's the pendrive name [bios -> hard drive
> emulation=hard drive, not auto]
>
> or:
> # grub
> find /b
Bowie wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Bowie wrote:
>>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Ok, there's been discussion, including, I think, on the wiki web
>> page, that syslinux is not correct. At any rate, after enough
>> experimentatio
> On 5/21/2010 10:56 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
>>> invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
>>> you omit it you'll get the #!/bi
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:54:26AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> # sh -x
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:52:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> A suggestion: in the script, add
> env > /tmp/smb.env
>
> or whatever you want to call it. Then you can compare and contrast with
> your environment.
Good idea. I'll try it when the system's back up. Someone's hunting up a
repla
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Bowie wrote:
>
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Bowie wrote:
>>>
That doesn't work for me.
# livecd-iso-to-disk /home/bowieb/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.iso
/dev/sda1
Verifying image...
/home/bowieb/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-
Les Mikesell wrote:
> OK, I can get a full-size Seagate 750G to resync at about 40M/s which
> easily completes in a workday. But now what I really want to do is use
> a laptop size 'WD Scorpio blue' drive which claims to have the same
> sector count but will only sync at about a tenth of the sp
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:00 -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:54:26AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>
> > # sh -x
On 5/21/2010 12:13 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> OK, I can get a full-size Seagate 750G to resync at about 40M/s which
>> easily completes in a workday. But now what I really want to do is use
>> a laptop size 'WD Scorpio blue' drive which claims to have the same
>> sector coun
Bowie wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Bowie wrote:
>>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bowie wrote:
> That doesn't work for me.
>>> Maybe I'm using the wrong script. I have livecd-iso-to-disk from the
>>> livecd-tools-014-8 package. Is liveCD-iso-to-disk a different script?
>>
>> Odd.
Hi;
I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I send
an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
gmail account, I never get it. It's not even in the spam filter. What
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
> Hi;
> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
> send an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can
> receive the email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to,
> for example, this gmail account, I
Susan,
Susan wrote:
> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
> send
> an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
> email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
> gmail account, I never get it. It's not ev
Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a "legal" helo address,
and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before the
message.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, wrote:
>> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
>> send
>> an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
>> email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
>> gmail account,
You might want to run your MTA's ip address through a blacklist checker.
Also, do you use srv records? Has anything here changed?
I've found that when it comes to email, its quite plausible for your system to
break because of an external party, for example, do you use the relay of your
ISP? If
> Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a "legal" helo
> address,
> and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
> connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
> won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before th
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:39:53AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
> What's the return value?
> service smb start
> echo $?
# service smb start
Starting SMB services: [ OK ]
Starting NMB services:
# echo $?
0
# ps aux | grep mbd
root 2520 0.0 0.0 107732
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What shell does the script specify at the top and what is found following
> $PATH?
Here's from the console:
# echo $PATH
/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/home/OpenBase/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/u
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:49:16AM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> My gut tells me it's not hardware but willing to take it :)
>
> Have you tried adding a "set -x" to the top of the the smb startup
> scripts? I didn't see any such output in your replies so far.
Here you go:
# ./smb start
+ '[' -f /e
Replies to all replies:
Richard asks:
> is the "domain you control" on the same machine as the form
> submission site?
Yes.
> was this machine recently upgraded to 5.5?
> [the 5.5 upgrade included sendmail and as a
> result could have had an impact on your sendmail.cf
> (depending on what
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:36:30PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Here's the path seen within the init.d/smb script (from an inserted echo
> $PATH > file):
>
> /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
And if I set that path in a console session, smbd still works when called
directly:
# export PATH=/sbin:/
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
> Here are what the logs have to say:
>
> @40004bf6cfc4383bc65c delivery 6217: deferral:
> CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ @40004bf6cfc4383c5eb4
> status: local 0/10 remote 0/255 @40004bf6d51e34d61d8c starting
> delivery 6218: msg 97
Simon Billis sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
Just to correct something I wrote:
> Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
>
>> Here are what the logs have to say:
>>
>> @40004bf6cfc4383bc65c delivery 6217: deferral:
>> CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ @40004bf6cfc4383c5eb4
>> s
On May 21, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> + /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 ; smbd -D'
What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
# /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 ; smbd -D'
Not sure what that might in theory do, but it works:
# ps aux | grep mbd | grep -v grep
root 7870 0.0
On Wed, 19 May 2010, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Just a general remark.
> When deploying a firewall, it is advisable to have (atleast for input, better
> for all) to have the general policy set to drop, and only allow in what you
> expect to be coming in. If you put a "-j log" li
>I found, something like that
>echo "0 0 0" >/sys/class/scsi_host/host/scan
>but it found only sda disk which is already running..
Just for your light reading on this matter:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7321
Good article outlining that usage...
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:01 -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:36:30PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
> > Here's the path seen within the init.d/smb script (from an inserted echo
> > $PATH > file):
> >
> > /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
>
> And if I set that path in a consol
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> Do you have logs / Google Analytics reports that show that visitors are
> actually landing on https://www.domainname.com (other than your
> testing)? If not, you can show this to management.
Thanks to everyone else for the replies on this t
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
> As for the redirection, I would handle it with mod_rewrite as follows:
>
>
> ServerName domain.tld
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.tld$ [NC]
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
> RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://www.domain.tld/$1 [
Les Mikesell wrote:
> But it is just a match for the Seagate drives with the default layout
> using one partition that fills the disk. If I have to skip some amount
> at the start of the partition I think that will make the partition size
> not match, making it impossible to add as a raid membe
On 5/21/2010 4:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But it is just a match for the Seagate drives with the default layout
>> using one partition that fills the disk. If I have to skip some amount
>> at the start of the partition I think that will make the partition size
>> not matc
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> From: Tom H
>> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 22:22
>> >> # rpm -V samba
>> >> S.5T c /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb
>> >> S.5T c /etc/samba/smbusers
>> >> ...T c /etc/sysconfig/samba
>> > I'm not sure but I really think you have the wro
On 05/21/2010 02:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
[..]
> Disk /dev/sdh: 750.1 GB, 750156374016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sdh1 1 91201 732572001 f
On May 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
>
> # /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 ; smbd -D'
>
> Not sure what that might in theory do, but it w
On 5/21/2010 4:37 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On May 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>>> What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
>>
>> # /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0>/dev/null 2>&1 ; smbd -D'
>>
On 5/21/2010 4:37 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 05/21/2010 02:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> [..]
>> Disk /dev/sdh: 750.1 GB, 750156374016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders
>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>>
>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id
On 21 May 2010 22:04, Ski Dawg wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> As for the redirection, I would handle it with mod_rewrite as follows:
>>
>>
>> ServerName domain.tld
>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.tld$ [NC]
>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
>> Rewrit
Les Mikesell wrote:
> These is a backuppc archive with millions of hardlinks that will take
> forever to copy if I have to do a file-oriented copy onto a different
> partition size.
>
have you tried a dump | restore style Ext{3|2}FS replica? that works
by inode and does it pretty efficient
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 09:39:29AM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
>
> Unfortunately trying to use dhclient.conf only leads to frustration.
> RH/Fedora chose in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth to make the dhcp
> client only read
> /etc/dhclient-eth#.conf and ifup-eth overwrites that file eac
On 21 May 2010 22:04, Ski Dawg wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
As for the redirection, I would handle it with mod_rewrite as follows:
ServerName domain.tld
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.tld$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
RewriteRule ^/(.*)
On 5/21/2010 5:46 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> These is a backuppc archive with millions of hardlinks that will take
>> forever to copy if I have to do a file-oriented copy onto a different
>> partition size.
>>
>
> have you tried a dump | restore style Ext{3|2}FS replica? th
On 05/21/2010 04:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/21/2010 4:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> But it is just a match for the Seagate drives with the default layout
>>> using one partition that fills the disk. If I have to skip some amount
>>> at the start of the partition I t
On 05/21/2010 07:39 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> You have another way out. By my calculation, that drive is partitioned
> in DOS compatibility mode, which leaves the remainder of the MBR track
> unused. Running fdisk in expert mode ("x" command), you can move the
> partition's beginning of data ("
hello
to postfix when a new update in the deposits
postfix in the deposits is outdated
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10-05-21 11:53 PM, fakessh wrote:
> hello
>
> to postfix when a new update in the deposits
>
> postfix in the deposits is outdated
Can I assume this is a request to update the version of Postfix in
CentOS? If so, then it's not likely to happen. The reasons are:
a) CentOS is a binary-compatibl
73 matches
Mail list logo
