On 5/21/2010 10:56 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
>> invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
>> you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh interpreter specified in the script
>> itself. Is there anything in your aliases or anything before /bin in
>> PATH where the working shell might be found?
>
> No aliases. No modification of PATH from the stock install. All other init.d
> scripts are working without problem.
But /bin isn't first in PATH. Does 'which sh' say /bin/sh? Also, sh and
bash are really the same thing. Does rpm -V bash show everything stock?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
