Hi All,
We have installed CentOS 5.3 x86_64 in an HP DL585 server with AMD Opteron
64 bit processor and 16 GB RAM. The kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 . Now
this has thrown an error message in /var/log/message,
Jul 3 21:41:11 db1 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: general bus error: participating
processor(l
JohnS a écrit :
> yum install Sabayon.i386
This looks exactly like the tool I need. But isn't the project abandoned?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>The project is a confluence of a sub-project under the cAos project,
Is this still true? Is Centos still officially associated with cAos? Or
was that supposed to be in the past tense?
-geoff
-
Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim NRW, Germany
http://www.galitz.org/
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus James A. Peltier spake:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have yesterday after some typos, sent my ext3 RAID5 array to the
>> void...
>>
>> I want to recreate it now, but I read on
>> http://wiki.centos.org/Ho
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 09:08 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> JohnS a écrit :
>
> > yum install Sabayon.i386
>
> This looks exactly like the tool I need. But isn't the project abandoned?
---
Niki. I don't see how it is abandoned when upstream slaps an article in
rh magazine plus it is in fedora. Suppo
Hi,
I've never been using NFS before, but I'm going to need it. I gathered
some documentation (Deployment Guide, RHEL 5 Unleashed, general NFS
docs) and I have a few machines to experiment with.
After about two hours of reading and experimenting, I must admit the
documentation is confusing, to
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:02:44 +0200
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> 1) Can you suggest some reliable and well-written (think:
> newbie-friendly) documentation about NFS?
There isn't much to setting up a simple NFS fileserver and client mount. Set
up /etc/exports on the server (this assumes your client is 1
luc...@lastdot.org schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Steven Vishoot wrote:
>> hello all,
>>
>> I have a setup that is raid 1 and put the mirrored drive back in and now it
>> is still showing as degraded saying: raid1: raid set md6 active with 1 out
>> of 2 mirrors with this message on al
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:02 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> For example, the RHEL
> deployment guide mentions NFSv2, NFSv3 and NFSv4... but as much as I
> poke around, I don't even find a way to checkout which one of the
> version I'm running.
>
---
That's because you have to specify what version
JohnS a écrit :
>
> It is in the man page which is astonishing to me.
>
Neither 'man nfs' nor 'man exports' specify any version. But I tried
again to mount the NFS share, this time by specifying a filesystem, like
this:
# mount -t nfs4 raymonde:/data /home/shares
Here's what I got this time:
--- Begin Message ---
Frank Cox a écrit :
There isn't much to setting up a simple NFS fileserver and client mount. Set
up /etc/exports on the server (this assumes your client is 192.168.0.3)
/whatever/where-ever/ 192.168.0.3(rw)
Start the nfs service. Create a mount point on the client
"mk
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> JohnS a écrit :
> >
> > It is in the man page which is astonishing to me.
> >
>
> Neither 'man nfs' nor 'man exports' specify any version. But I tried
> again to mount the NFS share, this time by specifying a filesystem, like
> this:
>
>
Greetings,
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Kurian Thayil wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have installed CentOS 5.3 x86_64 in an HP DL585 server with AMD Opteron
> 64 bit processor and 16 GB RAM. The kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 . Now
> this has thrown an error message in /var/log/message,
>
> Jul 3
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>
> Here's what I got this time:
>
> Warning: rpc.idmapd appears not to be running.
---
You need to start up your RPC services on the client
service rpcidmapd status
service rpcidmapd start and
chkconfig
John
__
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement like
"...latest release has many up-to-date desktop packages..." or any
other statement that might imply, suggest, hint, or even smell of
breaking compatibility with RH, for whatever reason,
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
>>
>>> BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement
>>> like "...latest release has many up-to-date desktop
>>> packages..."
>>
>> ummm -- it is of course true that changes happen; rebasings do
On 07/04/2009 08:07 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
>> The project is a confluence of a sub-project under the cAos project,
>
> Is this still true? Is Centos still officially associated with cAos? Or
> was that supposed to be in the past tense?
No, CentOS has nothing to do with caos in quite a few years
> Now where would the proper place be to put a route for load balancing like:
>
> ip route add default scope global nexthop via xx.yy.51.46 dev eth2 weight 3
> nexthop via aa.bb.166.2 dev eth3 weight 1
>
>
Hey Doug,
Congrats! Now that we have helped you, it is your turn to help us! :-D
Let u
the end of this circle for me
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>> Didi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2558/3679382429_d535f79823_o.jpg
(info offered by NedSlider)
>>>
>>> Have a look at t
I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard
that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5.
Though I'm partial to AMD processors, and would like to use one in my
new configuration, that's not a requirement, if the most appropriate
board happens to be intel-compatible.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 02:18:57PM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> >
> > If you do run without page space, you should configure the kernel
> overcommit
> > options.
>
> Is there a good, consistent, complete source of documentation for these
> optio
cation/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090704/b369c720/attachment-0001.bin
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
fred smith wrote:
> I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard
> that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5.
What role is that system going to play?
I assume server because I'd put money down that in excess of
99% of CentOS installations are servers. (that numbe
Kurian Thayil wrote:
> I understand this is an error message from Error Detection And Control
> module and just wanna confirm that this is not a kernel or software related
> issue. If Hardware related is it confined only to the Physical memory stick
> installed or processor related? Any hint on thi
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> also, I completely lost interest in this thread when it went into
> ranting lands, guess it might be worth catching up on.
>
not really. :-/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:48:37 +0200
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Any idea what might go wrong here?
firewall problem?
Try disabling your firewall and see if it works. If it does, then here is my
note about how to do make NFS work through a firewall.
HOW TO SET UP A FIREWALL THAT ALLOWS NFS
Create the
What exactly does the announcement mean to the CentOS community?
>From what point in the past to what point present/future should the
user community be concerned?
Once you find the final culprit, how sure will you be whether any
issue is/was malicious vs benign?
Do you perform regular server che
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement like
"...latest release has many up-to-date desktop packages..." or any
other statement that might imply, suggest, hint, or even smell of
breaking compatibility with RH, f
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Subject:
Re: [CentOS] Getting started with NFS
From:
Niki Kovacs
Date:
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:33:31 +0200
To:
Frank Cox
To:
Frank Cox
Frank Cox a écrit :
There isn't much to setting up a simple NFS
Thanks everybody for the detailed hints and answers, on the list as well
as offlist.
I got myself a second "sandbox" PC today, and I just installed two
vanilla CentOS 5.3 systems on them. It'll be much easier to figure out
the innards of NFS without the constantly nagging fear of breaking
some
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Thanks everybody for the detailed hints and answers, on the list as well
> as offlist.
>
> I got myself a second "sandbox" PC today, and I just installed two
> vanilla CentOS 5.3 systems on them. It'll be much easier to figure out
> the innards o
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:18:56AM -0700, nate wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard
> > that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5.
>
> What role is that system going to play?
>
> I assume server because I'd put money down th
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> What exactly does the announcement mean to the CentOS community?
This is not an easy answer.
> From what point in the past to what point present/future should the
> user community be concerned?
This happened currently. And as far as we can say now it only concerned
our CMS
> >
> > I have a setup that is raid 1 and put the mirrored drive
> back in and now it is still showing as degraded saying:
> raid1: raid set md6 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors with this
> message on all the raids.i know i am wrong by saying this but
> i thought putting in the driving and rebo
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Scott Ehrlich wrote:
>
>> What is the level and mitigation of damage control - current and
>> future?
>
> What are you trying to get at? This issue *only* concerned our web
> server. None of the machines actually "doing" the distribution are
36 matches
Mail list logo
