Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

Hello, We make good use of RT by Best Practical, it services an ISP and a NOC. http://www.bestpractical.com/rt HTH, Darrin 2009/3/29 Dhaval Thakar > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > > I need to implement

Re: [CentOS] Installing on partitionable RAID arrays

RedShift wrote: Glenn Matthys >>> As a follow-up, I found the documentation I wrote how to install CentOS >>> without any installer: >>> >>> >>> # First, setup your disks to your liking. You can use whatever you want >>> here, >> ... snip ... >>> (PS: I've also attached the documentati

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

Am 29.03.2009 um 08:45 schrieb Dhaval Thakar: > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > > I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their > application / other issues. Mail will be sent to te

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

Darrin Khan wrote: > [...] > We make good use of RT by Best Practical, it services an ISP and a NOC. > > http://www.bestpractical.com/rt > [...] I'd support RT, too. I've made some experiences with Kayako and RT and while I find Kayako far too complex (especially if you want to customize it),

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

At Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:15:16 +0530 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > > I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their > application / other issues. M

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio > station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their > radio > signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the > stati

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

We have had good luck with Mantis: http://www.mantisbt.org/ KC On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar wrote: > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > > I need to implement trouble ticket system, where us

[CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 install. >From rpm install: Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located in /usr/lib/flash-plugins nada. SoI then copied the plugin direct

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. 32-bit or 64-bit? The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway). On my 64-bit 5.2 m

Re: [CentOS] lftp SSL_connect error

> None of our data center machines are > able to connect so perhaps this is a firewall or NAT issue? Anyway > here is the very un-descriptive error message: > > SSL_connect: error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0) > Closing control socket > `ls' at 0 [Delaying before reconnect: 18] Furt

[CentOS] LifeKeeper vs RH/CentOS Cluster

Hello All: I've configured a few instances of RedHat/CentOS clustering. For basic services such as web, dns, and LDAP it seems to work well. My basic configuration just uses the core services and a DRBD volume for the shared storage. We have some existing LifeKeeper clustered systems. I don't kno

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > Since the release of CentOS 5.3 is imminent(?) I'd like to ask a > question regarding why did it took so long to be released and, more > important, suggest some actions in order to reduce this time if I can > assume what caused this delay. Late? I just finished cleaning

[CentOS] X session lockup (CentOS 4.7)

I just had a very odd incident with my session locking up, so I thought I'd describe it to see if it rings any bells with anyone. Background: I shut down my machine last night for Earth Hour, so the last thing I did before logging out was exit Firefox3, telling it to save my open tab state. When

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube wrote: > On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: > > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > > install. > > 32-bit or 64-bit? > > The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit > local version of Fire

[CentOS] OT: PCI Slot Adapter for 2.5" HDD?

Greetings CentOS list! I do apologize in advance for the OT nature of this post. Since many of you have great experience with different hardware platforms, specialized systems, etc I'm hoping someone can help me out. I have a 1U server for a personal project with only two hard drive bays in fron

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Michael A. Peters wrote: > >> First I'd like to make sure I am not complaining about this delay >> between the RHEL and CentOS releases per se. I did not help in any way >> to make it happen faster and usually I don't mind having a three weeks >> gap between them. But I've noticed that we had

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009/3/29 Chuck : > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit and have Shockwave Flash installed and working with Firefox v.3.0.6. Does that work for you? When I test at this URL:

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009/3/29 Chuck : > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube wrote: >> On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: >> > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 >> > install. >> 32-bit or 64-bit? >> The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit >> lo

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > 2009/3/29 Chuck : > > > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > > install. > > Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit and > have Shockwave Flash installed and working with Firefox

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

On Sunday 29 March 2009 1:45:16 am Dhaval Thakar wrote: > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > > I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their > application / other issues. Mail will be se

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500 Chuck wrote: > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. Do you have curl.i386 installed? (I've been bitten by this before.) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus > wrote: > >> 2009/3/29 Chuck : >> > >> > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 >> > install. >> >> Are you using CentOS 5.2 32 bit or 64 bit? I'm using 32 bit a

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500 > Chuck wrote: > > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > > install. > > Do you have curl.i386 installed? (I've been bitten by this before.) > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ M

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On 3/29/09, Chuck wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >>> 2009/3/29 Chuck : >>> > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent >>> > 5.2 >>> > install. >> Yes adobe flash player is the one I

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 49, Issue 13

pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090329/4097dea6/attachment-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list centos-annou...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500 Chuck wrote: > Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and > storage virt.) > > billabong:~ ==> rpm -q -a | grep -i curl > curl-7.15.5-2.el5 > curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5 curl.i386 -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.me

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500 > Chuck wrote: > > > Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and > > storage virt.) > > > > billabong:~ ==> rpm -q -a | grep -i curl > > curl-7.15.5-2.el5 > > curl-devel-7.15.5-2.

[CentOS] sylpheed email client oddity

With the Sylpheed email client: Compose a message Click the button to attach a file to that message Attach a file Save the message to draft Compose another message Click the button to attach a file to that message With Sylpheed 2.5.0 on Fedora 10 I see the directory containing the file that I att

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500 Chuck wrote: > Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info out > like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the > only 2 curl packages that ship with centos 5.2. You're absolutely sure about that ftp://f

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500 > Chuck wrote: > > > Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info > out > > like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the > > only 2 curl packages that ship

[CentOS] Q about 5.3 qt and qgis

Guess I'll find out soon enough ... In order to get qgis to build by RPM in CentOS 5.2 I had to update qt - but the shared library did not version - http://forum.qgis.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4423 Since the qt shared library did not version with the minor update to qt, my suspicion (though I do

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:11PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > as suggest, RT is a good choice. > But it requires some thinking and planning in advance, and a good > knowledge of PERL-intrinsics on RHEL/CentOS, as it requires around 200 > different PERL-module dependencies. See also the R

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar wrote: > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, GLPI may be worth a look -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Les Mikesell wrote: > Michael A. Peters wrote: >> Wow, I really must be out of the loop. New versions of RHEL every 4-6 >> months? >> >> Damn. I left Fedora because their release schedule was too frequent ... > > The Fedora releases change behavior wildly with each release. The point > of enter

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote: > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent > 5.2 install. > > From rpm install: > Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink > in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located > i

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:54 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thak

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

Hi, i'm using OTRS successful http://otrs.org/ On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude < eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thakar > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > GLPI may be worth a look > > -- > Edu

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > >> >> I need to implement trouble tracking system, > GLPI may be worth a look GLPI is more of an inventory system at heart - so it might make sense if you tie the issues to underlying devices (and you can couple it with ocsinventory-ng if you want then inventory to b

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

Dhaval Thakar wrote: > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, > we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > I setup Flyspray once as a trouble ticket system, even though its nominally a bug tracker, the two functions really aren't that different. http:/

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On 3/29/09, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote: >> I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent >> 5.2 install. >> An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin return with no >> complaints. >> > I notice you said in another post

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > The Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 move in RHEL was at least understandable, there > was good reason for that, but some of the EPEL changes - I think they > leave it to the discretion of the packager but it's annoying. Unfortunately it's o

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Michael A. Peters wrote: > Wow, I really must be out of the loop. New versions of RHEL every 4-6 months? Damn. I left Fedora because their release schedule was too frequent ... >>> The Fedora releases change behavior wildly with each release. The point >>> of enterprise versi

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Robert Nichols wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> Michael A. Peters wrote: >>> Wow, I really must be out of the loop. New versions of RHEL every 4-6 >>> months? >>> >>> Damn. I left Fedora because their release schedule was too frequent ... >> The Fedora releases change behavior wildly with each rele

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:15:16 +0530, Dhaval Thakar wrote: > Hi, > > I need to implement trouble tracking system, we have 250 users in one > premise & 3 desktop support technicians. > > I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their > application / other issues. Mail will b

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 15:02 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On 3/29/09, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote: > >> I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent > >> 5.2 install. > > >> An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin r

Re: [CentOS] Getting asciidoc

On: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:31:51 +0100, Frank Thommen wrote: >>> [dag] >>> [...] >>> enabled=0 >>> gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt >>> includepkgs=acsiidoc* bitt* perl* > ^ > ...this should probably read 'asciidoc'? :-) > > Cheers > > frank O

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Les: Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any way: Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the update before CentOS? Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox. Visit http://www.spammilter.com for

Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system

On Sun, March 29, 2009 1:52 pm, david.mackint...@xdroop.com wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:11PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> as suggest, RT is a good choice. >> But it requires some thinking and planning in advance, and a good >> knowledge of PERL-intrinsics on RHEL/CentOS, as it requi

Re: [CentOS] error when join my Centos machine to win2003 ADS server

On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 22:22 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote: > # Generated by authconfig on 2009/03/26 12:50:28 > # DO NOT EDIT THIS SECTION (delimited by --start-line--/--end-line--) > # Any modification may be deleted or altered by authconfig in future > >workgroup = BALADIA.LOCAL > ; password

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Neil Aggarwal wrote: > Les: > > Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any > way: > > Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the > update before CentOS? If I liked changing things on a whim, I wouldn't be using enterprise type distributions in the first place. And si

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Neil Aggarwal wrote: > > Les: > > > > Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any > > way: > > > > Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the > > update before CentOS? > > If I liked changing things on a wh

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Neil Aggarwal wrote: >>> Les: >>> >>> Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any >>> way: >>> >>> Why have you not moved to SL since they have released the >>> update before CentOS? >> If I liked ch

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:56:56PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Neil Aggarwal wrote: > >>> Les: > >>> > >>> Honest question, not intended to be smart assed in any > >>> way: > >>> > >>> Why have you not mov

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:56 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything > RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term > support? I thought perhaps when I mentioned it earlier there would be > a flurry of responses point

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: >> The Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 move in RHEL was at least understandable, there >> was good reason for that, but some of the EPEL changes - I think they >> leave it to the discretion of the packager but it's anno

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 09:56:07PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > >> The Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 move in RHEL was at least understandable, there > >> was good reason for that, but some of the EPEL changes

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 21:24 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:56 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything > > RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term > > support? I thought perhaps when I m

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

> So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything > RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term > support? I thought perhaps when I mentioned it earlier there would be > a flurry of responses pointing out functional deficiencies but so far > there hav

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:17:03PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > > > So what would be the down side to just walking away from everything > > RH-related now that Ubuntu has a free alternative with long term > > support? I thought perhaps when I mentioned it earlier there would be > > a flur

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Christopher Chan wrote: > start/stop' though from Intrepid onwards I believe. There is no root > account by default. There is a root account, you just can't access it w/o setting it's password. And as soon as you do set it's password, I highly recommend you then completely disable and lock dow

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

>> Functional deficiencies here we come: >> >> 1) No equivalent to kickstart: >> By that I mean, zero support for automated lvm on raid kind of disk >> partitioning in the debian-installer >> > > This is a huge issue with SLES. AutoYaST makes me very angry. :-) I > can generalize my ki

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Michael A. Peters wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > > >> start/stop' though from Intrepid onwards I believe. There is no root >> account by default. >> > > There is a root account, you just can't access it w/o setting it's password. > Oh you can. sudo -i. Now go away. > And as soon as

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

> Centos (who cares about RHEL) needs a bit more extra work to make it > more useful for desktops. I had to build me own kiosktool rpm for example. Ahh, yes. RH has pretty much said they're not interested in the desktop market. Until that changes either Fedora or Ubuntu it is. I'd pick Ubuntu

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> Centos (who cares about RHEL) needs a bit more extra work to make it >> more useful for desktops. I had to build me own kiosktool rpm for example. >> > > Ahh, yes. RH has pretty much said they're not interested in the > desktop market. Until that changes either Fedo

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

Chuck wrote: > > I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 > install. From a stock CentOS 5 system, fully updated do the following: 1) Install Adobe's yum repository configuration: rpm -ivh http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/adobe-release/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.no

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

Zube wrote: > On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote: > >> I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 >> install. > > 32-bit or 64-bit? > > The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit > local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:50:26PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> Centos (who cares about RHEL) needs a bit more extra work to make it > >> more useful for desktops. I had to build me own kiosktool rpm for example. > >> > > > > Ahh, yes. RH has pretty much said t