Le Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:08:32 +0200
Daniel de Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 13:49 +0200, Martin Hamant wrote:
> > Le Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:16:54 +0200
> > Martin Hamant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> >
> > (snip)
> > > I don't know how it's possible to improve this, mayb
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:54 -0400, Johnn Tan wrote:
> What error messages are you seeing? On one of my machines, I
> have four domU's (kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen), each with 4
> VCPUs. I don't see any errors in any of the domU's dmesg.
> But /proc/cpuinfo shows they are each using all 4 CPUs.
S
- Original Message -
From: "Akemi Yagi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 10:49:26 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?
On 8/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original M
On 8/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Akemi Yagi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>
> The i686 version has been tested / used for a while now and I'm sure
> Johnny can tell you his experience. As for x86_64, it is not as
Thanks Fabian,
There seem to be a number of different ways of installing the ipw2200
firmware and as I've said already I've tried puttting the .fw files into
the firmware directory - why doesn't this work? What is actually the
best/recommended way of installing the firmware in CentOS 5 please? - no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Akemi Yagi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 10:49:26 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?
>
> On 8/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTE
[sorry for breaking the threading, only joined after reading this on the web]
Michael St. Laurent wrote:
I'm having speed problems with the SCSI card we're using to do tape
backup. It seems to be functioning in 16 bit mode and the current
thinking is that perhaps it's using a legacy driver inst
- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2007 9:28:50 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Akemi
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 07:20 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks Fabian,
> There seem to be a number of different ways of installing the ipw2200
> firmware and as I've said already I've tried puttting the .fw files into
> the firmware directory - why doesn't this work? What is actually the
> be
Peter,
I'm using pam_mkhomedir on redhat 5 and centos5 just as it worked in
previous versions of redhat...why do you believe that pam_mkhomedir
doesn't work?
Aaron
Peter Huber wrote:
I have a problem creating homedirs on the fly. Since RHEL5 / CentOS5
you have to use pam_oddjob_mkhomedir ins
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Huber
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:20 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS5 pam_mkhomedir
>
> I have a problem creating homedirs on the fly. Since RHEL5 /
> CentOS5 you ha
Simple fix,
Adaptec & CentOS = :-(
LSI & CentOS = :-)
We spent a few days trying to get Adaptec cards working with LTO-3
drives. It was suggested to me from this list to try an LSI, we bought
one, it worked, problem solved.
Dean
David Groep wrote:
> [sorry for breaking the threading, only joine
I have a problem creating homedirs on the fly. Since RHEL5 / CentOS5 you have to
use pam_oddjob_mkhomedir instead of pam_mkhomedir.
Everything is working (the homedir is created) but two things.
First on every logon I get the following error message, and I don't know how to
fix it:
org.freedeskt
Hi,
I am hoping someone can kick me up the learning curve (!) on Virtualization:
We have an old piece of data logging software that was written in Turbo
Pascal 6 using a file I/O module tuned to Netware and so it expects its data
files to be on a Netware server and will not access them locally or
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Kendrick
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:46 AM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] Virtualisation of Netware?
>
> Hi,
>
> I am hoping someone can kick me up the learning curve (!)
Nigel Kendrick wrote:
Hi,
I am hoping someone can kick me up the learning curve (!) on Virtualization:
We have an old piece of data logging software that was written in Turbo
Pascal 6 using a file I/O module tuned to Netware and so it expects its data
files to be on a Netware server and will no
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
I am hoping someone can kick me up the learning curve (!) on
Virtualization:
We have an old piece of data logging software that was written in
Turbo
Pascal 6 using a file I/O module tuned to Netware and so it expects
its data
files to be
Hi,
Plant, Dean wrote:
Simple fix,
Adaptec & CentOS = :-(
LSI & CentOS = :-)
Which is why after a few hours of testing I decided to indeed buy a
couple of LSI cards to test with -- far better than a lot of frustration.
But, meanwhile, I decided to test one more thing: just suppose that the
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ross S. W. Walker
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Virtualisation of Netware?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:27 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualisation of Netware?
Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am hoping someone can kick me up the lear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Johnny Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2007 9:28:50 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> - Or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steve Huff
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:46 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualisation of Netware?
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> I am hoping someone can kick
Hey All, How can I find processes that were started with nohup and kill
them?
thanks all
Also, is this the right list for that kind of question?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,
Im trying to configure my centos machine to run webservices.
Im using the mono repo from www.*mono*-project.com, for rhel-4.
After configuring every thing, it all seemed to work fine with a simple
webservice for testing purposes.
For that, a friendo of mine created a vb webservice on a w
I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
if no arch is specified.
I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I only want
the x86_64 versions of, if I want the i386 versions too I wou
On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
> there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
> if no arch is specified.
>
> I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I
On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
> there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
> if no arch is specified.
>
> I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I onl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum install preferred arch only
>
> On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
> there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
> if no arch is specified.
>
> I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I onl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:08 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum install preferred arch only
>
> On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> Plant, Dean wrote:
> > Simple fix,
> >
> > Adaptec & CentOS = :-(
> > LSI & CentOS = :-)
>
> Which is why after a few hours of testing I decided to indeed buy a
> couple of LSI cards to test with -- far better than a lot of
> frustration.
>
> But, meanwhile, I decided to test one more thing:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
...
> Unless you are planning to run only stripped-down systems, that can
> cause trouble. A lot of packages do not have 64-bit versions
Quite a big leap from this (lots of packages, cause trouble, ..)
> and need
> (lots of) 32-bit support pack
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
...
> Maybe it's time for Yet-Another-Yum-Plugin YAYP, I will call it
> yum-arch-affinity and will only select the target arch of a package
> if multiple versions resolve, and if only 1 resolves to allow that
> to go through, this should allow pac
can someone do this:
1. download this archive
http://plone.googlecode.com/files/Plone-2.5.3-final.tar.gz
2. open it using midnight commander
3. copy its content to any directory
4. check
ATReferenceBrowserWidget\skins\ATReferenceBrowserWidget
subdirectory
5. there should be files refere
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Kjellstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:34 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum install preferred arch only
>
> On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> ...
>
> I did the same (changed the speed in the BIOS settings) and it's
> working. I tried it at 80 but I think I'm going to bump it to 160 and
> see if it works.
The 160 speed works as well for me. It seems that only the 320 speed
causes a problem. Which is interesting because Dell says that the dr
I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems.
I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in SCO
UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC server.
This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SA
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Sedlacek
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:18 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
>
> I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers &
>
Daniel de Kok wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:54 -0400, Johnn Tan wrote:
What error messages are you seeing? On one of my machines, I
have four domU's (kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen), each with 4
VCPUs. I don't see any errors in any of the domU's dmesg.
But /proc/cpuinfo shows they are each using
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 17:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I had at one point copied a large number of files between drives and did
> not use the -p and thus the timestamps were all set to the date of the copy.
>
> I did not catch this, and deleted the source. So I 'lived' with it and
> have
On CentOS-based VM appliance I'm building, I would like to create a script
that runs upon login that asks the user a series of questions that does
(among other things) ask them to input their networking information (IP,
mask, gate, DNS, etc).
I'm hoping you guys might point me in the right directi
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 17:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
P.S.
I make (the possibly invalid assumption) that the original directory
timestamp is a valid comparator to use in seeing if the file(s) have
been modified. For you case, if this is valid, the negation of the test
might be needed.
--
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 17:54 -0400, Johnn Tan wrote:
> I'm thinking it's either the kernel version or, like the
> user states, maybe it's something with HyperThreading.
Hyperthreading is off on the machines where this occurs. Since the
problem seems to occur handline timer interrupts, this could b
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 8/6/2007 4:22 PM:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 8/6/2007 2:40 PM:
>>
>>> I had at one point copied a large number of files between drives and did
>>> not use the -p and thus the timestamps were all set to the date of the
>>
Hi
Howto install postfix-mysql and pam-mysql from repository yum
PD. excuse my English, I I speak Spanish
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I have a modem in my system that comes up with this in lspci:
01:07.0 Communication controller: Agere Systems 56k WinModem (rev 01)
What programs under CentOS, if any, can use this modem and how?
Thanks.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rogelio Bastardo
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 6:02 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] startup config scripts for CentOS
>
> On CentOS-based VM appliance I'm building, I would like to
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 05:07:59PM -0700, Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
> I have a modem in my system that comes up with this in lspci:
>
> 01:07.0 Communication controller: Agere Systems 56k WinModem (rev 01)
>
> What programs under CentOS, if any, can use this modem and how?
It's a "worthless winmo
On 8/7/07, Rogelio Bastardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On CentOS-based VM appliance I'm building, I would like to create a script
> that runs upon login that asks the user a series of questions that does
> (among other things) ask them to input their networking information (IP,
> mask, gate, DNS,
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:45 -0400, Steve Huff wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
>
> > I am hoping someone can kick me up the learning curve (!) on
> > Virtualization:
> >
> > We have an old piece of data logging software that was written in
> > Turbo
> > Pascal 6 using
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Lukasz wrote:
> Subject: [CentOS] [5.0] little bug confirmation request
> can someone do this:
>
> 1. download this archive
> http://plone.googlecode.com/files/Plone-2.5.3-final.tar.gz
>
> 2. open it using midnight commander
>
> 3. copy its content to any directory
I would s
Can anybody tell me, how to fix these two problems?
I have no problem with pam_mkhomedir on my CentOS 5 installation:
Works for me, the option for setting the home dir perms is umask=
Thank you. Actually there no problem using pam_mkhomedir. RedHat says something
different (http://www.redhat
52 matches
Mail list logo
