----- Original Message ----- From: "Akemi Yagi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 10:49:26 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?
On 8/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Johnny Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> > Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 9:55:10 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware? > > > > The kernels are available in testing form here: > > > > http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/vmware-kernels/ > > > > > > > > Johnny, will these kernels eventually be pushed into centosplus ? > > > > Maybe ... we are trying to work out a way to prevent conflict. Users > seem to have a problem with more than 1 item of the same type in a > specific repo. We will put out instructions on how to use > "exclude=whatever" in yum, but they don't and then we get a hundred bug > reports / e-mails that the plus kernel replaces the vmware kernel or the > other way around. > > If we can have them easily coexist in the same repo and make it EASY for > the users and provide the content, then we will put them there, > otherwise (or until then) people will need to look for it here. > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes > > Cool, > > would you say they are ready for primetime even although they are in > 'testing' ? > > Cheers, > > Brian. The i686 version has been tested / used for a while now and I'm sure Johnny can tell you his experience. As for x86_64, it is not as extensively tried. I have been running it in a test VM and all seems good so far. Akemi _______________________________________________ Does anyone know if the i686 version is PAE enabled ? Cheers. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
