Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Paul, One big question, before I try to file a bug against EPEL: what version of trac is your package at? I'll reiterate that I don't now use nor have I ever used the Agilo plugin. We've got five servers running Trac: * two run trac-0.12-2.ce

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread m . roth
Paul, One big question, before I try to file a bug against EPEL: what version of trac is your package at? Yeah, I realize that you probably set it up under an older version that didn't have this bug, but My latest trick (and I've been googling for days now) was to run trac-admin /pa

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: A possibly related question: as I said, I installed via yum trac-agilo-plugin. In /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ I see both agilo and agilo-0.9.7-py2.6.egg-info. In the SetEnv in my apache config *what* do I put in? I see, by running python from t

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread m . roth
Paul Heinlein wrote: >On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as >> though there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the >> existing admin (in small print at the right top) shouldn't be >> ".../trac.cgi/undefined".

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as though there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the existing admin (in small print at the right top) shouldn't be ".../trac.cgi/undefined". Haven't seen that bit of fun.

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread m . roth
mark wrote> > On 04/03/14 18:21, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the >>> information shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is >>> undefined? >>> >>> All of this is from the

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread mark
On 04/03/14 18:21, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the information >> shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is undefined? >> >> All of this is from the quick-start for agilo,

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the information shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is undefined? All of this is from the quick-start for agilo, where it says to go to admin, and create a team,

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread m . roth
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Still googling, and found something *else* I don't understand: all >> the docs I find online talk about editing trac.ini, *apparently* in >> /path/to/proj/conf/trac.ini. But I just found that there's an >> /etc/trac/trac.ini. So,

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Still googling, and found something *else* I don't understand: all the docs I find online talk about editing trac.ini, *apparently* in /path/to/proj/conf/trac.ini. But I just found that there's an /etc/trac/trac.ini. So, *now* which should be edited?

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-03 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > CentOS 6.5, with the current trac, and trac-agilo-plugin. > > I seem to have problems, and maybe even a bug in the packaging. > > I installed and got trac running with authentication. Fine. I installed > and enabled the agilo plugin. Supposedly fine. > > Except it doesn't