On Friday 21 August 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am 21.08.2009 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Kjellstrom:
> > On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >>> We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but
> >>> not fast.
> >>
> >> Heard this a few times now, in the interest of get
On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >If you really want to go with a HW controller, try Areca or the high-
> >end 3Ware models.
>
> Well, for non Solaris/non file servers, hardware raid is easiest. I am
> hesitant to go with Areca (looks like cheap tw stuff). I have always used
> LS
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:04:58PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> Am 22.08.2009 um 12:37 schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen:
> >
> >Uhm.. Solaris/zfs can't really light-up the failure lights on Sun's
> >own
> >hardware?
>
>
> Of course it can - on SUN's own hardware.
> But you can run Solaris on almost
Am 22.08.2009 um 12:37 schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen:
Uhm.. Solaris/zfs can't really light-up the failure lights on Sun's
own
hardware?
Of course it can - on SUN's own hardware.
But you can run Solaris on almost any hardware - and that turns into a
problem sometimes. Like in this case...
ZFS
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 07:40:24PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> Am 21.08.2009 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Kjellstrom:
>
> > On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >>> We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but
> >>> not fast.
> >>
> >> Heard this a few times now
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have always used LSI stuff but found them slow as hell, I am pretty sure
> the hp sa's are LSI
> chips...
>
for a server, random IO operations per second is usually more important
than sequential burst read/write. I've found many server RAID cards
excell at IOP
Am 21.08.2009 um 21:07 schrieb Joseph L. Casale:
>> If you really want to go with a HW controller, try Areca or the high-
>> end 3Ware models.
>
> Well, for non Solaris/non file servers, hardware raid is easiest.
True. Replacing disks is much easier for sure.
> I am
> hesitant to go with Arec
>If you really want to go with a HW controller, try Areca or the high-
>end 3Ware models.
Well, for non Solaris/non file servers, hardware raid is easiest. I am
hesitant to go with Areca (looks like cheap tw stuff). I have always used
LSI stuff but found them slow as hell, I am pretty sure the hp
Hello
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am 21.08.2009 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Kjellstrom:
>
>> On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but
not fast.
>>> Heard this a few times now, in the interest of getting something
>>> b
Am 21.08.2009 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Kjellstrom:
> On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but
>>> not fast.
>>
>> Heard this a few times now, in the interest of getting something
>> better
>> next time, what have you f
On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but not fast.
>
> Heard this a few times now, in the interest of getting something better
> next time, what have you found equally reliable but faster?
Nothing as cheap as a full dl185
>We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but not fast.
Heard this a few times now, in the interest of getting something better
next time, what have you found equally reliable but faster?
>- hpacucli requires you to twist your brain sideways (syntax)
Heh, that's no doubt:)
___
On Friday 21 August 2009, Mag Gam wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone here has experience with HP MSA60 with P400
> and P800 controller. How reliable are they for a 24x7 shop?
We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but not fast.
We've had one flaky controller in 30 controller
Mag Gam wrote:
> Well, I am poor and so is my school.
>
Hear, hear
> We want to setup a cheap storage farm so I was asking what is people's
> opinions on the the controller and the disks :-)
>
Cor, looks like it is not just me having to think of a storage farm.
Over here, some downtime (a
>Well, I am poor and so is my school.
>
>We want to setup a cheap storage farm so I was asking what is people's
>opinions on the the controller and the disks :-)
It's rock solid, I am sure you wont have issues...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Well, I am poor and so is my school.
We want to setup a cheap storage farm so I was asking what is people's
opinions on the the controller and the disks :-)
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone here has experience with HP MSA60 with
Mag Gam wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone here has experience with HP MSA60 with P400
> and P800 controller. How reliable are they for a 24x7 shop?
>
well, its not 5-nines stuff, there's all kinda single points of
failure. you want 0.9 kinda reliability, you need a fully redundant
syst
17 matches
Mail list logo
