On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but not fast. > > Heard this a few times now, in the interest of getting something better > next time, what have you found equally reliable but faster?
Nothing as cheap as a full dl185 that's for sure unless you count SUNs thor (thumper ng) machines but then you'll have to do the raid part in software somehow. I do like Nexsans Satabeast and qlogic HBAs though :-) /Peter > >- hpacucli requires you to twist your brain sideways (syntax) > > Heh, that's no doubt:)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
