Take a look at Cacti, which is available in the EPEL repo:
https://www.cacti.net/
It's not just for network accounting. It polls multiple hosts for all
kinds of data and keeps RRD tables for display. Cacti provides a web
interface that can display the data in charts. You'll need to install
pl
On 9/13/21 18:47, MRob wrote:
While you probably can't recover such information for past events,
going forward, iptables can help you figure this out. Putting an
IPtables
rule in the OUTPUT table prior to ACCEPTing the packets can help, e.g.:
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m owner --uid-owner
See "man iptables-extensions" and "man iptables". I don't know how this
works with firewall-cmd, but I imagine firewalld "just" manages
iptables?
Yes thats right
I am running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core). Is there a way to
find
out which process consumed network bandwidth during a spe
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 14:24, Anand Buddhdev
On 06/09/2021 19:35, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi Kaushal,
I am running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core). Is there a way to find
out which process consumed network bandwidth during a specific time period?
For example, the Nginx process consumed
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 14:24, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2021 19:35, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>
> Hi Kaushal,
>
> > I am running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core). Is there a way to find
> > out which process consumed network bandwidth during a specific time period?
> >
> > For example, t
On 06/09/2021 19:35, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi Kaushal,
> I am running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core). Is there a way to find
> out which process consumed network bandwidth during a specific time period?
>
> For example, the Nginx process consumed how much network traffic on Sept
> 01, 202
On 2015-04-27, Les Mikesell
wrote:
--SNIP--
> And I guess the other piece of this would be finding individual
> packages that are not encompassed by the groups - or pulled in by
> dependencies.Is there some database-like approach to take the full
> list of packages, then reduce it to the min
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
>>> in the anaconda install. For example wher
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
>> in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
>> shows @gnome-desktop and @de
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
> in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
> shows @gnome-desktop and @development, 'yum grouplist' only shows
> 'MATE Desktop' which
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:45:16PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> But, I think that is a YUM database and not based on the RPM database,
> so it is possible that you can have all the RPMs for a group installed
> and not actually have it listed as installed.
> At least I sometimes find myself in that
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
>> installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
>> instead of the initial anaconda install?
>
On 04/27/2015 01:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
>> installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
>> instead of the initial anaconda install?
>
> Yes. "y
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
> installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
> instead of the initial anaconda install?
Yes. "yum grouplist" will tell you the groups that are current
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:32:01PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> One other thing I would try: disable selinux, and see if that lets
> apache read file, e.g.:
>
> setenforce 0
Setting SELinux to permissive temporarily is a good start, although
it's also helpful to check the audit logs, with:
au
On Sat, January 24, 2015 11:27 am, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file,
> no. You could probably use the logs and `last` to see who was logged
> in at the time and make a guess.
>
>
>
> Also, you can look into shell history files (
Hey guys,
Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file,
no. You could probably use the logs and `last` to see who was logged
in at the time and make a guess.
Also, you can look into shell history files (though that might be cleaned
by users). Admin is allowed to do that
On Fri, January 23, 2015 3:13 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:50:44PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> Is there any way to find out the last user to access a file on a CentOS
>> 6.5 system?
>
> Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file,
> no. You co
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:50:44PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Is there any way to find out the last user to access a file on a CentOS
> 6.5 system?
Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file,
no. You could probably use the logs and `last` to see who was logged
in at the
On 10/28/2014 5:32 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 10/28/2014 04:00 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name
w
On 10/28/2014 04:00 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www \)
/usr/lib/httpd
/usr/lib64/httpd
/var/www/
>
> In centos, the apache package is named httpd, not apache. try removing the
> packages first. (yum remove httpd)
Yup! Already done. I did say I removed apache packages, realizing the name
of the package is actually httpd in centos. My bad for not communicating
clearly. This exercise is just t
2014-10-28 23:00 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy :
> Hey guys,
>
> Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
> variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
>
>
> [root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www
> \)
> /usr/lib/httpd
> /usr/lib64/ht
Hi
find / -name "*httpd*" -type d |grep -v www\
Thanks.. Ideally I'd like to use the -delete flag to find once i have the
right command. But with that I suppose I could use find / -name "*httpd*"
-type d |grep -v www\ | xargs rm -rfv
Assuming that the initial find doesn't do anything too scary
On 10/28/2014 11:00 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name www \)
/usr/lib/httpd
/usr/lib64/httpd
/var/www/
Hi John,
Thx, it works.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/17/2014 6:32 PM, Benjamin Fernandis wrote:
> > Is there any command or way to grab disk / storage /volume path for
> > particular guest vm?
>
> # virsh domblklist kfat
> Target Source
> -
On 7/17/2014 6:32 PM, Benjamin Fernandis wrote:
> Is there any command or way to grab disk / storage /volume path for
> particular guest vm?
# virsh domblklist kfat
Target Source
hda/var/lib/libvirt/images/kfat.img
hdb/var/lib/li
don't forget to escape that exclamation point if typing on bash.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Tim Dunphy
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. But what if I want to turn that statement into one that will
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>
>> Thanks. But what if I want to turn that statement into one that will delete
>> everything it finds? I need to preserve the contents of that directory.
>>
>> As in : find / -path '/usr/local/digitalplatform/*' -prune -o -name
>> "*varnish*"
Why not copy the directory elsewhere, then delete the rest and move it
back? You'd take a copy of it anyway, if it is important, right?
Cheers,
Cliff
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Thanks. But what if I want to turn that statement into one that will delete
> everything i
On 05/11/2014 01:06 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hal & Jack
>
> Both are perfect! Thanks
>
> [root@uszmpwsls014lb ~]# find / -print | grep -v digitalplatform | grep
> varnish
> /var/lib/varnish
> /var/lib/varnish/uszmpwsls014lb
> /var/lib/varnish/uszmpwsls014lb/_.vsl
> /var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:33:47PM -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> find / -path '/usr/local/digitalplatform/*' -prune -o -name "*varnish*"
Try
find / -path /usr/local/digitalplatform -prune -o name '*varnish*' -print
Without the explicit -print, find will implicitly add one
e.g
find / \( -path ..
Hal & Jack
Both are perfect! Thanks
[root@uszmpwsls014lb ~]# find / -print | grep -v digitalplatform | grep
varnish
/var/lib/varnish
/var/lib/varnish/uszmpwsls014lb
/var/lib/varnish/uszmpwsls014lb/_.vsl
/var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage.bin
/usr/lib64/libvarnish.so.1
/usr/lib64/libvarnishapi.so.1
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 12:33 -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to do a find of all files with the phrase 'varnish' in the
> name, but want to exclude a user home directory called
> /usr/local/digitalplatform.
find / -path /usr/local/digitalplatform -prune -name \*varnish\* doesn'
find / -print | grep -v digitalplatform | grep varnish | xargs rm
But test this first - you don't want to remove anything by accident.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Thanks. But what if I want to turn that statement into one that will delete
> everything it finds? I need
Thanks. But what if I want to turn that statement into one that will delete
everything it finds? I need to preserve the contents of that directory.
As in : find / -path '/usr/local/digitalplatform/*' -prune -o -name
"*varnish*" -exec rm -rfv {} \;
I'm thinking the grep -v would be a visual thing,
So:
find / -print | grep -v digitalplatform | grep varnish
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Hal Wigoda wrote:
> Just grep it out.
>
> find . -print | grep -v digitalplatform
>
> -v excludes
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm trying to do a find of
Just grep it out.
find . -print | grep -v digitalplatform
-v excludes
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to do a find of all files with the phrase 'varnish' in the
> name, but want to exclude a user home directory called
> /usr/local/digitalplatform.
> Order of operations
> find /path/to/files/ -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz -print0
Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:41:51PM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> If I run this:
> find /path/to/files/ -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz
> find /path/to/files/ -print0 -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz
Order of operations
find /path/to/files/ -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz -print0
--
rgds
Ste
Am 05.08.2012 00:19, schrieb Tim Dunphy:
> I'm trying to write a script that will search through a directory of trace
> logs [...] and it's not possible to know the exact
> names of the files before they are created. The purpose of this is to
> create service checks in nagios.
[...]
> The problem
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:19:39PM -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> hello list,
>
> I'm trying to write a script that will search through a directory of trace
> logs for an oracle database. From what I understand new files are always
> being created in the directory and it's not possible to know the ex
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:26:26PM +, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Its not intellectual enough and its too short and its also simple.
You left out "incorrect".
John
--
Like its politicians and its wars, society has the teenagers it deserves.
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote:
> I like:
>
> find . -type f -printf '%TY/%Tm/%Td %TH:%TM:%TS %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
>
> which shows the last access date/time in a human-readable format that also
> sorts nicely (/MM/DD HH:MM:SS).
>
> Note tha
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:15:53PM +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>>>
>>> Try something like:
>>>
>>> find . -type f -printf '%A@ %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
>>
>> I believe you want %T@ instead of %A@ (modification time versus access
>> tim
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 10:23 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with ls -laFrt?
>
> Everything !
>
> Its not intellectual enough and its too short and its also simple.
>
Ok, then ls -ZlaFrt | tail -1 | sort | tail -1
That better?
mark "is the obfus
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 10:23 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> What's wrong with ls -laFrt?
Everything !
Its not intellectual enough and its too short and its also simple.
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:15:53PM +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>>
>> Try something like:
>>
>> find . -type f -printf '%A@ %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
>
> I believe you want %T@ instead of %A@ (modification time versus access
> time). I would also suggest sort -nr to sort fr
On 12/9/2011 9:27 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:15:53PM +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>>
>> Try something like:
>>
>> find . -type f -printf '%A@ %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
>
> I believe you want %T@ instead of %A@ (modification time versus access
> time). I would also sug
thank you!
Helmut
Am 09.12.2011 15:15, schrieb Mogens Kjaer:
> find . -type f -printf '%A@ %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:15:53PM +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>
> Try something like:
>
> find . -type f -printf '%A@ %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
I believe you want %T@ instead of %A@ (modification time versus access
time). I would also suggest sort -nr to sort from most recent to least
recent.
On 12/09/2011 02:41 PM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to find in a directory hicharchy the most recent time of file update.
>
> I think, there could be a solution with find?
Try something like:
find . -type f -printf '%A@ %p\n' | sort -n | tail -1
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo
Its not a bug, its a feature ... and this is not a joke.
You [de|re]fine the search with the suffices you supply making it
possible to hand "find" a granularity mechanism that indeed makes
find a very powerful utilitiy.
Jobst
s
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:16:40PM -0500, Les Mikesell (lesmikes..
On 3/25/2010 6:07 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:45:14AM +0100, Ala1n Sp1neu8 (aspin...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>> Hello
>> find /etc -size -1G
>
> Very interesting way of finding all files with a file size of 0 ;-)
What's interesting is that the program doesn't do the uni
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:45:14AM +0100, Ala1n Sp1neu8 (aspin...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> Hello
> find /etc -size -1G
Very interesting way of finding all files with a file size of 0 ;-)
Jobst
>
> should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a
> list of empty file (size=0)
>
>
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>> Ala1n Sp1neu8 wrote:
Hello
find /etc -size -1G
should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a
list of empty file (size=0)
find /etc -size -2G
work fi
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Ala1n Sp1neu8 wrote:
>>> Hello
>>> find /etc -size -1G
>>>
>>> should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a
>>> list of empty file (size=0)
>>>
>>> find /etc -size -2G
>>>
>>> work fine and return all the files
>>>
>
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Ala1n Sp1neu8 wrote:
>> Hello
>> find /etc -size -1G
>>
>> should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a
>> list of empty file (size=0)
>>
>> find /etc -size -2G
>>
>> work fine and return all the files
>>
>> This works the same on my fedora11 and
Ala1n Sp1neu8 wrote:
> Hello
> find /etc -size -1G
>
> should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a
> list of empty file (size=0)
>
> find /etc -size -2G
>
> work fine and return all the files
>
> This works the same on my fedora11 and my centos 5 !
>
> Did I miss something o
> Your "-path" argument is wrong. Try this:
>
> find /var/data/foo -path '/var/data/foo/.snapshot' -prune -o -exec chown
> usera:groupb {} +
>
> You need the whole path, and there is no need to escape the '.' character.
> I've also used "+" as the terminator. That's just an efficiency issu
Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have to use find to change the perms of a directory and files within
> that directory recursively but i need to exclude a directory within the
> top level directory, as its a netapp and so contains a read only
> .snapshot dir.
>
> I have tried...
>
> # find /var/da
On 2009-12-31 15:13, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Just an concluding update to anybody who might be interested :)
>
> My apologies for blaming spamassassin in the earlier email. It was
> taking so long because of the real problem.
>
> Apparently the odd exim processes that was related to the mail loo
Just an concluding update to anybody who might be interested :)
My apologies for blaming spamassassin in the earlier email. It was
taking so long because of the real problem.
Apparently the odd exim processes that was related to the mail loop
problem I nipped was still the culprit. I had overlook
I initiated services shutdown as previously planned and once the
external services like exim, dovecot, httpd, crond (because it kept
restarting these services), the problem child stood out like a sore
thumb.
There was two exim instances that didn't go away despite service exim
stop. Once I killed
Hi,
> I do not know about now but I had to unload the modules in question.
> Just clearing the rules was not enough to ensure that the netfilter
> connection tracking modules were not using any cpu at all.
Thanks for pointing this out. Being a noob admin as my pseudonym
states, I'd assumed stoppi
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Yes, these figures indicate that you are fairly close to being cpu bound.
>>
>> What kind of filtering are you doing? If you have any connection
>> tracking/state related rules set, you will need to be using a fair
>> amount of cpu.
>
> Initially, when the load
Hi,
> Yes, these figures indicate that you are fairly close to being cpu bound.
>
> What kind of filtering are you doing? If you have any connection
> tracking/state related rules set, you will need to be using a fair
> amount of cpu.
Initially, when the load start going up, I had thought the APF
Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 31.12.2009, 12:34 +0100 schrieb Chan Chung Hang
> Christopher:
Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
>>> procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --syste
Am Donnerstag, den 31.12.2009, 12:34 +0100 schrieb Chan Chung Hang
Christopher:
> >> Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
> >> you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
> >
> > procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
> > -cpu--
>> Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
>> you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
>
> procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
> -cpu--
> r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo in cs us sy id wa
> st
>
Hi,
> Dstat could at least tell you if your problem is CPU or I/O.
This was the result of running the following command which I obtained
from reading up about two weeks ago when I started trying to
investigate the abnormal server behaviour.
dstat -c --top-cpu -d --top-bio --top-latency
usr sys
Hi,
> You should also try out "atop" instead of just using top. The major
> advantage is that it gives you more information about the disk and
> network utilization.
Thanks for the tip, I tried it and if the red lines are any
indication, it seems that atop thinks my disks (md raid 1) are the
pr
Hi,
> > since initially it seems like the high load may be due to I/O wait
> Maybe this will help you to identify the IO loading process:
>
> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/red-hat-backported-io-accounting-to-rhel5
Thanks for the suggestion, I did install dstat earlier while trying to
figure things
On 2009-12-29 23:44, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> My Centos 5 server has seen the average load jumped through the roof
> recently despite having no major additional clients placed on it.
> Previously, I was looking at an average of less than 0.6 load, I had a
> monitoring script that sends an email w
On 12/29/2009 11:44 PM, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> My Centos 5 server has seen the average load jumped through the roof
> recently despite having no major additional clients placed on it.
> Previously, I was looking at an average of less than 0.6 load, I had a
> monitoring script that sends an emai
Am Mittwoch, den 30.12.2009, 05:44 +0100 schrieb Noob Centos Admin:
> since initially it seems like the high load may be due to I/O wait
Maybe this will help you to identify the IO loading process:
http://dag.wieers.com/blog/red-hat-backported-io-accounting-to-rhel5
Chris
financial.com AG
Mun
On Dec 30, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Noob Centos Admin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Try blocking the IPs on the router and see if that helps.
>
> Unfortunately the server's in a DC so the router is not under our
> control.
That sucks, oh well.
>> You can also run iostat and look at the disk usage which also
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> However, iostat reports much lower %user and $system compared to top
> running at the same time so I'm not quite sure if I can rely on its
> figures.
> ...
> iostat
> Linux 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5xen 12/30/2009
> avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
>
Hi,
> Try blocking the IPs on the router and see if that helps.
Unfortunately the server's in a DC so the router is not under our control.
> You can also run iostat and look at the disk usage which also
> generates load.
I did try iostat and its iowait% did coincide with top's report, which
is
Hi,
> last time I saw something like that, it was a bunch of chinese 'bots'
> hammering on my public services like ssh.
>another admin had turned
> pop3 on too, this created a very heavy load yet they didn't show up in
> top (bunches of pop3 and ssh processes showed up in ps -auxww,
> however, plu
On Dec 29, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Noob Centos Admin
wrote:
> My Centos 5 server has seen the average load jumped through the roof
> recently despite having no major additional clients placed on it.
> Previously, I was looking at an average of less than 0.6 load, I had
> a monitoring script th
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> My Centos 5 server has seen the average load jumped through the roof
> recently despite having no major additional clients placed on it.
> Previously, I was looking at an average of less than 0.6 load, I had a
> monitoring script that sends an email warning me if the c
From: john blair
> I want to write a script to find the latest version of rpm of a given package
> available from a mirror for eg:
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/
> Is there any existing script that does this? Or can someone give me a general
> idea on how to go about this
I should have mentioned that I am looking for a solution that I can even run
from my debian box (i.e no yum)
--- On Thu, 12/10/09, john blair wrote:
> From: john blair
> Subject: [CentOS] find latest version of rpms from a mirror
> To: centos@centos.org
> Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 12:
john blair wrote:
> I want to write a script to find the latest version of rpm of a given package
> available from a mirror for eg:
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/
> Is there any existing script that does this? Or can someone give me a general
> idea on how to go about this
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
> What you need is this:
> http://choon.net/php-mail-header.php
>
> But this requires recompiling PHP..
>
you're assuming this is being done via PHP, it could as easily be coming
from a bad perl CGI or another similar exploitable web service.
___
> They just say that Apache is sending them, so I cannot pinpoint the
> virtual host.
Perhaps time to get rid of one common log file and set up per-host
logs in apache
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
Peter Peltonen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:05 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Peter Peltonen wrote:
>>> I got a report that my CentOS 5.4 is used for sending spam.
>>>
>>> >From sendmail maillog I can see that apache has been sending a lot of
>>> email to suspicious addresses.
>>>
>>> Probably
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Peter Peltonen
wrote:
> I got a report that my CentOS 5.4 is used for sending spam.
>
> >From sendmail maillog I can see that apache has been sending a lot of
> email to suspicious addresses.
>
> Probably one of the many Apache virtual hosts I have is used for
> se
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:05 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Peter Peltonen wrote:
>> I got a report that my CentOS 5.4 is used for sending spam.
>>
>> >From sendmail maillog I can see that apache has been sending a lot of
>> email to suspicious addresses.
>>
>> Probably one of the many Apache virtual
Peter Peltonen wrote:
> I got a report that my CentOS 5.4 is used for sending spam.
>
> >From sendmail maillog I can see that apache has been sending a lot of
> email to suspicious addresses.
>
> Probably one of the many Apache virtual hosts I have is used for
> sending spam. But how to find out wh
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Eric Sisolak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Basically I want to find all files with a string (except binary)
>> and change it. let STR be the string I am looking for. NEW is new
>> string.
>
> Hmm, why
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I missed the "!" in the above paste:
>>
>> find . -type f -exec grep -il \!* {} \; -exec grep -i \!* {} \; -exec echo
>> \;
>
> If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),
>
> g
Jeremiah Heller wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2008, at 09:33, MHR wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -ri virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
>>> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
>>> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
>>
>> Doh! Of course - -r implies multiple files, so
On 6 Oct 2008, at 09:33, MHR wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hu?
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -ri virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
| conf.d/ssl.conf:
| conf.d/ssl.conf:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -rHi virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
| conf.d/ssl.c
Well, in your specific case you could replace it only in files that
are *.c or *.h, you can easily use an additional parameter to "find"
to accomplish that:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:34, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> find . -type f |
> while read fil
> do
> sed -i 's/prog/n
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hu?
>
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -ri virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -rHi virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
>
MHR wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),
> >
> > grep -ri "foo" dir/to/search/in
> >
> > seems much shorter to me.
> >
>
> Without the -H you don't get the file names
Hu?
| [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),
>
> grep -ri "foo" dir/to/search/in
>
> seems much shorter to me.
>
Without the -H you don't get the file names
mhr
__
Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> find . -type f -exec grep -il !* {} \; -exec grep -i !* {} \; -exec echo \;
>>
>> alias it to, say, findword and run: findword
>
> Sorry, I missed the "!" in the above paste:
>
> find . -type f -exec grep -il \!* {} \; -exec grep -i \!* {} \; -exec echo \;
If you are usi
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
