On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>>
>> I did think about that when when I made my earlier comment. The trouble is
>> is
>> that it obviously isn't working because we have these list flame-ups.
>
> I think 8 million unique machines
On Feb 22, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> Only joking. I take your point, but the critical fixes being held up for a
> dot
> release isn't really very Enterprise friendly either. I think it fair to say
> that CentOS is not suitable for the enterprise unless the servers are
> non-public
> I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment. Who
> knows, maybe all 8 million are wrong and the 10-20 people who are
> discussing it on this list are right.
Man, you could build a killer botnet if you wanted to!! (which strengthens your
argument about the point about t
> With 8 million unique machines running Centos and perhaps millions
> people more depending on them comes great responsability.
> I hope the Centos crew know what they're doing.
Obviously they do, or they would not have come this far.
___
CentOS mailin
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment.
With 8 million unique machines running Centos and perhaps millions
people more depending on them comes great responsability.
I hope the Centos crew know what they're doing.
C
On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
>> *origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
>> de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
>
>
> How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandin
I really appreciate the availability of CentOS. Thank you to all the people
who work on it and form part of this community!!
Best,
Aleksey
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:54:58PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
> >
> > No one is taking you wrong here;
>
> Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all?
Pretty damned sure I made it explicitly clear in a post from
Sunday that I speak only for myself and no
>
> Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
> *origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
> de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandingrebrandingofupstreamenterpriselinuxOS?
Only joking. I t
> > How about the project
> > renames the distribution to
> "IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS"?
>
> That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much
> fairer assessment of
> the distribution than alluding to the "Enterprise" aspect.
Calling it Enterprise is important b
>
> No one is taking you wrong here;
Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all?
> How about the project
> renames the distribution to "IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS"?
That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much fairer assessment of
the
I understand how answering everyone's requests for progress updates can
slow a development process, I've been on the development side of that
before. I want a progress report as much as anyone I'm sure (and so
does my boss), but, I'm not going to ask for it. I instead spend a
little time, and d
Corey A Johnson wrote:
>
> John Hinton wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> (and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
>>
>>
>
>
> I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
> list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
> members immensely.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:33:39AM +, Ian Murray wrote:
>
> You get me wrong here. I am not having a go about how long the updates are
> taking...(if you think I am, you are not reading my comments properly)...
> take
> as long as you want... just please don't dress the distribution as ente
- Original Message
> From: Barry Brimer
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Mon, 21 February, 2011 21:12:57
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!
>
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
>
> > Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:21 AM, John Hinton wrote:
> We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS
> releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as
> simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use CentOS and with that choice
> comes nothing more.
Maybe
I too am with the fella's on this. Thanks for all your time and hard work. It
is greatly appreciated, more then words can say.
Aly
--Original Message--
From: Corey A Johnson
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
> Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest enterprise grade.
How does the time between upstream release and downstream release have any
effect on whether or not something is considered "enterprise grade"?
Barry
___
On 02/21/2011 04:02 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
> another six months and 5.6 another 2 months. Perhaps we have been spoilt by
> the
> snappiness of the releases in the past. Plus, rename to something that
> doesn't
> suggest enterprise grade.
You always have the option of paying for a RHEL license i
>
> 2. Add more staff. As a small business owner, the very last thing you
> want to do is add more staff when you are in a slammed state. It takes
> all of the 'productive' workers time to train the new staff and output
> slows to a crawl.
..
On 02/21/2011 01:21 PM, John Hinton wrote:
> All,
>
> (and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
>
> We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS
> releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as
> simple as that. Each of us 'chose'
> I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
> list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
> members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in
> to what i consider the best free Linux distro available.
+1000
_
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:34 -0500, Corey A Johnson wrote:
> I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
> list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
> members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in
> to what i consider
> John Hinton wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> (and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
>>
>>
>
>
> I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
> list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
> members immensely. I sincerely thank you all
John Hinton wrote:
> All,
>
> (and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
>
>
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time y
All,
(and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS
releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as
simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use CentOS and with that choice
comes nothing more.
26 matches
Mail list logo
