On 02/21/2011 04:02 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > another six months and 5.6 another 2 months. Perhaps we have been spoilt by > the > snappiness of the releases in the past. Plus, rename to something that > doesn't > suggest enterprise grade.
You always have the option of paying for a RHEL license if you want "true" enterprise grade Linux. CentOS fills a niche; People who need a very stable distro while not being willing or able to pay the Red Hat license fees. That it takes time to release does nothing to diminish it's "enterprise" quality. In fact, I'd argue that rushing it out the door would do more harm than good. If you can't wait, go RHEL or Debian as you have. In the meantime, please leave the *volunteers* creating CentOS alone. They will release CentOS 6 when they are able to, and no sooner. -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
