Re: [CentOS] script to find last accessed time?

2008-12-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 10:27 +, Tom Brown wrote: > Can anyone help me with the syntax to find last accessed time on a bunch > of dir's - something like show me the files that were last accessed 6 > months or more ago? > > thanks > ___ > CentOS maili

[CentOS] Slightly OT: Dell Poweredge 2850 with 4GB RAM

2008-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, I got the previously mentioned Dell Poweredge 2850 with 4GB RAM and Perc4e raid controller. Installation went well and the raid is pretty fast even with level 5. However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM. Googling a bit, got me to install kernel-PAE, this went w

RE: [CentOS] Faking RHEL with CentOS

2008-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NiftyClusters T Mitchell wrote: > > If there are 1 files it might look at 1 different places > including device names kernel names, shell features, kernel > modules and more. > i.e all the things that 'configure' might know about and more. Yeah, that's my main worry. > /etc/redhat-

RE: [CentOS] Faking RHEL with CentOS

2008-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote: >> From CentOS /etc/redhat-release: > CentOS release 5.2 (Final) > >> From RHEL3 /etc/redhat-release: > Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 9) > >> From RHEL4 /etc/redhat-release: > Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update 7) > > Has anybody maybe actuall

[CentOS] Faking RHEL with CentOS

2008-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, I'm looking to test out a solution with CentOS instead of our venerable RHEL3-servers. Some of the software we use and need, requires for it to run on RHEL. Figuring that CentOS is binary compatible with RHEL this should work anyway. I also found out using Google that many programs look in

RE: [CentOS] CentOS on Dell Poweredge 2850

2008-09-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Forde <> scribbled on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:10 AM: > [snipping galore] You've got a PERC > 5/i, and I know that's supported in OMSA under RHEL 5.2. So I'd say > just go for it... and if you want more confirmation that it's certified > and supported for RHEL 5.2, you can check the

RE: [CentOS] CentOS on Dell Poweredge 2850

2008-09-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Forde <> scribbled on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:10 AM: >> Thx. A former unix-admin at the dept thinks it might be a little on the old >> side hardware-wise, this particular server is about four years old. I'm >> split... >> >> This particular Poweredge modell is certified for RHEL 2 a

RE: [CentOS] CentOS on Dell Poweredge 2850

2008-09-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michel van Deventer <> scribbled on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:31 AM: Our department's planning to buy a refurbished Dell Poweredge 2850 running dual-xeons and with a rather big raid array (8x 146GB). *My* plan is to install CentOS on this machine and I'd like to hear wi

RE: [CentOS] CentOS on Dell Poweredge 2850

2008-09-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Forde <> scribbled on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:35 PM: >> Our department's planning to buy a refurbished Dell Poweredge 2850 running >> dual-xeons and with a rather big raid array (8x 146GB). >> >> *My* plan is to install CentOS on this machine and I'd like to hear with >> you guys if the

RE: [CentOS] Tmp directory and sticky

2008-09-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Hoffman <> scribbled on Monday, September 15, 2008 8:18 AM: > But the chmods I did with winscp will not take effect (they do on other > directories) so I manually ran chmod 1777 on the tmp folder. Did you do a Ctrl-R to refresh the view in WinSCP? I've been caught with that a few times befo

RE: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

2008-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lanny Marcus <> scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM: >> You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One >> Million Great British Pounds) > > Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $ "Great British Pound"? I didn't know UK stopped using Pounds Sterling.

RE: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niki Kovacs <> scribbled on Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:16 PM: > So, to answer the question above: IMNSHO, the best advice comes from an > expert who *can* think like a newbie. (At work, I usually deal with the > opposite paradigm :oD) There is no more dangerous user than a user that knows *a

RE: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anne Wilson <> scribbled on Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:44 AM: > Meanwhile, hostile reception of well-meaning efforts does put off a great > many newbies, which is a real shame. Well said! (That's what I was trying to say initially but didn't quite succeed.) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cr

RE: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anne Wilson <> scribbled on Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:39 AM: > On Thursday 04 September 2008 10:30:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Ok, so this list should be kept a bit more professional than the others. I >> might be touching the zealot/religious angle here. 8-) >

RE: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niki Kovacs <> scribbled on Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:41 AM: > Romeo Ninov a écrit : >>> >> Absolute true, but very often newbie ever if find/detect the problem >> give stupid/dangerous/senseless solution/idea. > > Reminds me of what happens in Ubuntu forums and the likes on a daily basis.

RE: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Romeo Ninov <> scribbled on Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:36 AM: >>> 2) Why can you possibly help if you yourself are a newbie? It's just the >>> blind leading the blind. >>> >> >> I've noticed that sometimes only a not-so-new-newbie can help another >> newbie. A "pro" can sometimes not see t

RE: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd <> scribbled on Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:13 PM: > 2) Why can you possibly help if you yourself are a newbie? It's just the > blind leading the blind. I've noticed that sometimes only a not-so-new-newbie can help another newbie. A "pro" can sometimes not

Re: [CentOS] postfix mysql_pgsql update?

2008-09-02 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Duncan napsal(a): > Another humble request here :) > > thanks > Any progress? D. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

centos@centos.org

2008-08-29 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mad Unix napsal(a): > Hi > > I need a script to automatically Starting/Stopping an Oracle 10g DB on > CentOS5.2 64bit i.e > lsnrctl start/stop > db start/stop > emctl start/stop dbconsole" > Any help? > > I'm using this one. David #!/bin/bash # # chkconfig: 35 95 15 # description: init script

RE: [CentOS] wireless laptop configuration

2008-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karanbir Singh <> scribbled on Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:47 PM: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless Trying to learn wifi netwroking with linux, and CentOS v5.2 in particular. Following the above howto helped a bit on the way, but I'm nowhere near getting the wifi-card to connect.

Re: [CentOS] rebuilding the kernel.

2008-08-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnny Hughes pisze: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Johnny Hughes pisze: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yahia Tachwali pisze: Hello folks, Hi. It is request for it to add this in kernel for centosplus, look at this: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3019 I am trying to add HDLC module support in the

Re: [CentOS] rebuilding the kernel.

2008-08-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnny Hughes pisze: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yahia Tachwali pisze: Hello folks, Hi. It is request for it to add this in kernel for centosplus, look at this: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3019 I am trying to add HDLC module support in the menuconfig. However, I am facing difficulties

Re: [CentOS] rebuilding the kernel.

2008-08-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahia Tachwali pisze: Hello folks, Hi. It is request for it to add this in kernel for centosplus, look at this: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3019 I am trying to add HDLC module support in the menuconfig. However, I am facing difficulties in rebuilding the kernel and modules. My main ob

RE: [CentOS] Help: Server security compromised?

2008-08-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noob Centos Admin Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 5:17 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Help: Server security compromised? On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Sorin Srbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: See

Re: [CentOS] way OT: CCNA Router Sim

2008-07-29 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ed Donahue napsal(a): I know this is completely off topic, but I was wondering if anyone could suggest a good network/router simulator. I don't want to spend $80 on CCNA CertSim unless I have to. Cisco packet tracer. David ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] Ideas for stopping ssh brute force attacks

2008-07-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:34:54 +0200 Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Bo Lynch wrote: > > > >> just wanted to get some feedback from the community. Over the last > >> few days I have noticed my web server and email box have

RE: [CentOS] Torrent sharing question

2008-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Bowden <> scribbled on Friday, June 27, 2008 11:54 AM: > Just a quick question. I have been sharing CenOS 5.0 and 5.1 since I down > loaded them. Now we are on to 5.2 is it still worth sharing them or can I > archive them to DVD and save some hard drive space? I removed my 5.1 torrents coupl

RE: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload

2008-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karanbir Singh <> scribbled on Friday, June 27, 2008 10:28 AM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> That addon rocks! Add the delta-addon as well, and you get really fast >> updates! 8-D > > There is no functional delta-addon for yum in CentOS-5, are you getting > confuse

RE: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload

2008-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karanbir Singh <> scribbled on Friday, June 27, 2008 10:27 AM: > tech wrote: >> I would like to ask that more flexibility be built into automatically >> choosing sites for downloading. > > You can always just disable the yum-fastestmirror plugin if its not > working well for you. In /etc/yum/plug

RE: [CentOS] Re: Automatic site selection for dowload

2008-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech <> scribbled on Friday, June 27, 2008 9:57 AM: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> Me thinks they call that yum-fastestmirror :) > > Me thinks that doesn't work. It works in Sweden. In fact the fastest-mirror thing works better now with the v5.2 than ever before. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

RE: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload

2008-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joseph L. Casale <> scribbled on Friday, June 27, 2008 9:29 AM: >> Is it possible when deciding these default sites to look at actual >> bandwidth and not just geographical closeness? >> >> Mel > > Me thinks they call that yum-fastestmirror :) That addon rocks! Add the delta-addon as well, and

RE: [CentOS] is centos update safe

2008-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William L. Maltby <> scribbled on Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:49 PM: > an > update of a live server without adequate testing and/or fallback plan is > akin to unassisted suicide. It won't be your foot you shot yourself in > if something goes drastically wrong. LOL! Clear and to the point. Good one!

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

2008-06-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karanbir Singh <> scribbled on Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:31 PM: > Ned Slider wrote: >> As this seems to affect the default install configuration we presumably >> need to add a note somewhere to reflect this. Thanks for spotting and >> reporting it. >> >> Has anyone else experienced this or can c

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

2008-06-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karanbir Singh <> scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:51 PM: >> Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I >> get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... >> > > well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it > jus

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

2008-06-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Micklei <> scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM: > Thank you CentOS team for the good work! I second that! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailma

[CentOS] 5.2 blues

2008-06-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... -- Best Wishes Sorin - http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/ Proud member of TEAM OS/2. M

Re: [CentOS] Commercial Support for CentOS 5 or above

2008-06-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:16:58 +0800 "Daniel Chen (yongnche)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I saw there's one "Commercial Support" in "Support" menu on CentOS > main page, but it's blank. Actually I'm looking for the commercial

RE: [CentOS] Urgent Help Required!!!!!!!!!!!

2008-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is your DVD-drive a SATA-model? _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rajeev sharma Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:14 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Urgent Help Required!!! Hi All, I am Rajeev. I have download centOS 5.1 i386 files

RE: [CentOS] RE: School Server Setup-Summary

2008-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope all goes well! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Sukumar Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:16 AM To: Harry Sukumar; centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] RE: School Server Setup-Summary Dear All, Thank you very much to every one on the list

RE: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup]

2008-06-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alain Terriault <> scribbled on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:55 PM: How do you mean "big sophisticated setup"? I think CentOS is rather easy to setup, in fact CentOS was the OS of choice when I first started with linux. I'm not fishing for flaming or trolling, just curious on why you think like

RE: [CentOS] School Server Setup

2008-06-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Cox <> scribbled on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:32 AM: > If, for > example, the school has only dial-up Internet access, or if they pay by the > megabyte for data transfer, then you might want to restrict external > traffic in some way and setting up a public webserver isn't the way. Smoothwal

RE: [CentOS] School Server Setup

2008-06-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Sukumar Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:04 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] School Server Setup Hello All!!! I was wondering if you can help me little bit.. I am trying to help (voluntary service) a countr

RE: [CentOS] Booting Diskless Workstations

2008-06-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John R Pierce <> scribbled on Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:40 AM: > Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Something just occured to me on this this... >> >> Suppose I have an old Amd 486DX2/40, could this oldie be setup so that it >> boots a minimal (blocky) GUI over NFS to be able to run xmms or something >> like th

Re: [CentOS] sticky bit inside user's dir

2008-06-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:45:21 -0600 Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:43 +0300 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any workaround against that? > > Use chattr to set it as an immutable file. &

[CentOS] sticky bit inside user's dir

2008-06-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello there, I have the following problem. I need a user not to be able to delete (rm -rf) a dir inside his home directory (a dir which is owned by him). The sticky bit is supposed to do just that... and it does, in every part of the file system but in his home. Same goes for acls (setfacl -m u:use

RE: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?

2008-05-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeffrey B. Layton <> scribbled on Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:31 PM: I use CentOS 5.1 with 256M RAM (incl X, Gnome, Firefox etc and the proprietary Nvidia 3D gfx drivers. Yes I know it's overkill, but it's so much nicer and easier to move around stuff using a file manager instead of doing it on the C

[CentOS] kaffeine installation

2008-05-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone got kaffeine installed. When I do a #yum install kaffeine I get a transaction check error with kde-libs. Is this a known issue and is their a workaround? regards, secrookie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mail

Re: [CentOS] ssl and NameVirtualHost

2008-04-09 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kai Schaetzl napsal(a): IE does and I think FF does as well. But IE doesn't support this specific extension. Kai Both support TLS. FF supports server name indication, only IE7 on Vista supports server name indication. IE7 on XP doesn't. :o( D. __

Re: [CentOS] ssl and NameVirtualHost

2008-04-09 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jim Perrin napsal(a): "Name-based virtual hosting cannot be used with SSL secure servers because of the nature of the SSL protocol." See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html for more info Jim, you are not right... SSL 3.0 support Server Name Indication and of course TLS 1.0

Re: [CentOS] simple load balancing/failover for OWA

2008-04-03 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ruslan Sivak napsal(a): We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover, and prefereably load balancing for them. Russ Russ, take a look at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html Da

Re: [CentOS] kickstart and remote logging

2008-03-06 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt Hyclak napsal(a): I believe 5 does, but 4 does not. Matt I do believe so. :o( I need it for C4. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] dovecot/procmail w/maildir format?

2008-02-23 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenneth Porter napsal(a): If one has a large hierarchy of mbox files managed by dovecot and procmail, is there a convenient way to convert them to maildir? Can one serve an account that uses both? What about INBOX? Must that be a mbox file in /var/spool/mail/ or can it be a maildir directory

Re: [CentOS] popular open source forum software?

2008-02-22 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael A. Peters napsal(a): Whatever you choose, be very careful of third party plugins and watch the security notices. Bulletin Boards are notorious for poor code that allows various types of hacks from simple defacing to full blown compromise - especially the third party plugins to the va

Re: [CentOS] NoMachine NX Server

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Sobari Tanuwijaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Is there anybody ever have an experience install NoMachine NX Server > on > centos? Is there anything need to get special attention? > Thanks in advance > > -- Tanu -- >

Re: [CentOS] Timing a command

2008-01-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Scott Ehrlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to keep track of how long a task is running. Thinking it > wouldn't > take that long, I opted not to run time before it. The fact that it > is > taking a long time, if I revisit the machine in the

Re: [CentOS] Desktop freeze... now what?

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Niki Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Olaf Mueller a écrit : > > > Last time I saw something similar was when my harddisk get broken. > Are > > there any opcode entries in /var/log/messages or /var/log/dmesg? > > > Something crosses my mi

Re: [CentOS] HP Autoloader

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - "Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to backup data to an HP autoloader, it needs to be *full* > > backups each time so using Amanda doesn’t make sense. > > > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Desktop freeze... now what?

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Niki Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > > > > Did/Can you get the customer to try 'Ctrl-Alt-F1' or similar > > I suggested Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, but that didn't work. > >

Re: [CentOS] Mounting /var directory to a new HardDisk

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For sure you will be able to mount /var on your new disk > > but not before you boot single user and copy all the contents across > manually and then modify /etc/fstab to reflect the new location of > /var. > > In my experience it is

Re: [CentOS] Mounting /var directory to a new HardDisk

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: next time use LVM *even* if you only have 1 physical disk to start with. It makes this sort of situation an non-event. Cheers. - "Indunil Jayasooriya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a mailgw running Centos where trendmicro(IMSS) is installed. > it

[CentOS] Scalix Doesn't recommend Centos... Use Zimbra instead ;-)

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look at their website (http://www.scalix.com/community/communityedition/index.php) , they state; == System Requirements Operating Systems Supported Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.0 or 5.0 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server

Re: [CentOS] Do we have any Zimbra users on the list?

2008-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Milton Calnek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've never looked at scalix, but I have installed zimbra on a test > system. > > Unfortunately, I had to install from a tarball, which I really don't > like. > > Instead of determining if you have

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

2008-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Marko A. Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please take your excitement somewhere else. This list is definitely > not > an appropriate venue for it. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > htt

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

2008-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My boss just caught me reading that stuff and he thought as I was looking at porn ! Funny. - "Christopher Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > ˙˙˙uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹɐ sƃuıɥʇ llɐ > > (: ɹɐǝu sı plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɟo puǝ ǝɥʇ > > 'llɐ ıɥ &

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

2008-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
¿ ʞɔǝu pǝʞɔıɹɔ ʎɯ ɹoɟ ǝns ı uɐɔ oɥʍ - "Christopher Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > ˙˙˙uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹɐ sƃuıɥʇ llɐ > > (: ɹɐǝu sı plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɟo puǝ ǝɥʇ > > 'llɐ ıɥ > > > > It's on http://www.en.fliptext.n

Re: VS: [CentOS] take plunge and yum update to 4.6

2007-12-19 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): > > I use apache, mysql and php from centosplus. > Anyone updating similar to 4.6? > > Jukka Yes. Updates and runs smoothly. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Logging into Windows 2003 Active Directory

2007-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "centos@centos.org" Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 5:45:13 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] Logging into Windows 2003 Active Directory I have been searching

Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning

2007-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:42:56 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning On

Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning

2007-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:55:49 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:48:57 +1000 (EST) &

Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning

2007-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:43:08 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:52:5

Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning

2007-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:20:01 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning I want to set up a multiple "mode"

Re: [CentOS] take plunge and yum update to 4.6

2007-12-17 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert - elists napsal(a): > Usually I am one of the first ones to do it > > I have resisted this time... > > It is almost the Holidays and out centos 4 boxes have been online for like 2 > years or whatever > > Has anyone boldly taken the plunge on any high use and/or Internet facing > Centos$ s

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem that doesn't store duplicate data

2007-12-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CentOS Mailing list" Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 11:18:16 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] Filesystem that doesn't store duplicate data Is there such a filesystem available? It seems like it

Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1

2007-12-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Chris Mauritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 11:30:04 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

2007-12-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart Schaefer pisze: I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng. Strange. I ran yum update -y from shell and this is resolved correctly by yum itslef. sos

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 versus i386

2007-12-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Manish Kathuria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, December 3, 2007 2:49:32 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] x86_64 versus i386 Hello, On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we ha

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booting properly. What could I do to avoid this situ

Re: [CentOS] Mail Server Install

2007-11-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Jun Salen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 11:54:46 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] Mail Server Install Hi Friends, I am planning to upgrade my mail server from CentOS4.

Re: [CentOS] OT: virtual server hosting recomendation

2007-11-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rimuhosting.com/ gets my vote. - Original Message - From: "David Hrbáč" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 8:41:18 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] OT: virtual server hosting recomenda

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

2007-11-27 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Heitor Augusto M Cardozo napsal(a): > Yes, the BBU is installed and write_cache is enable. I will test JFS to > compare. Could you share the results then? Thanks, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c

Re: [CentOS] HDD usage oddity

2007-11-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Ugo Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 10:37:31 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] HDD usage oddity Hi, 2 of my Centos4 servers are showing weird behavior. [EMAIL P

Re: [CentOS] pure-ftpd-1.0.22

2007-11-18 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Shibu C Varughese napsal(a): > hi david.. > > i have installed it using yum after adding the repo from > http://centos.karan.org/ do visit the site, and add the repo from > there to install the rpm build :) > > Thanks, > Shibu, Karanbir has only 1.0.20... :o) D. __

Re: [CentOS] IO causing major performance issues

2007-11-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Antonio Varni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 9:06:52 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] IO causing major performance issues Hello everyone. I'm wondering what other people&

Re: [CentOS] central logging/analysis

2007-11-14 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Shibu C Varughese napsal(a): > On 11/15/07, Johnny Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm interested in doing centralized logging & analysis of logs from my >> CentOS boxes. >> >> I messed around with syslog-ng and it seems like it's a better syslog. &

Re: [CentOS] Sso the Linux way?

2007-11-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Jason Pyeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:23:17 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] Sso the Linux way? So I was googling around about this over the last week

Re: [CentOS] configuring sendmails domain

2007-11-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Jerry Geis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS ML" Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:11:02 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] configuring sendmails domain I tried editing sendmail.cf and changing the Dj l

Re: [CentOS] Re: A good primer to User Administration?

2007-11-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Eric B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 9:58:15 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] Re: A good primer to User Administration? "Shibu C Varughese" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: [CentOS] Need advice on storage

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "boisvert guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 4:47:35 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re : Re: Re : Re: [CentOS] Need advice on storage - Message d'origi

Re: [CentOS] OT: Slow browsers or slow connections?

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Mark Hull-Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:58:01 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] OT: Slow browsers or slow connections? I have AT&T (formerly SB

Re: Re : Re: [CentOS] Need advice on storage

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "boisvert guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:01:32 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re : Re: [CentOS] Need advice on storage - Message d'origine -----

Re: [CentOS] Need advice on storage

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e* for almost 400gb *less* storage that is *not* redundant ! Linux software raid-5 performance is pretty good, my 4 x 400gb sata's show 155mb/s reads with 'hdparm -t'. No brainer ! Cheers, Brian. - Original Message - From: "boisvert guy" <

Re: [CentOS] atmail & centos

2007-11-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > hi friends, > > i'm researching to see if i can run my own email server on > centos. i'm looking at qmail & centos, but the problem that i > have i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS to support ICH9

2007-10-31 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi, new delta ISOS have been published yesterday. Both (x386, x86_64) contains kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 with improved ich9 support. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/ Regards, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-29 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Rock napsal(a): > Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I > meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped, > I then realized that last request sounds really bad, > which was not my intention. Michael, could you test a new version? http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable

Re: [CentOS] CentOS to support ICH9

2007-10-29 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Hrbác napsal(a): > Hi Jake, > thanks. Maybe I could extend those install DVD with some rpms. I vote > for these two for now: > e1000 > r8198 > Regards, > David > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-29 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simone Montagnani napsal(a): > > > Thank you for the answer, > > I'm trying to install centos 5.0 on a Asus P5KC motherboard system (with > Intel QX6850 processor), I got > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta > and applied to the original CentOS-5.0-x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-29 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simone Montagnani napsal(a): > > No one can help me? > > I can't apply delta on original DVD x86_64 iso , what's wrong with that? > do you know something i'm missing ? > > thank you > > Simone Simone, what's deltaprm's version and what platform are you running? David __

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-27 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Rock napsal(a): > > I still need to get the P5K-VM setup and since it is a > server I would still like to use Centos. Are the new > DVD's ready yet? > > -- Mike Well, I have tried to recreate ISOs, with delta files. Everything's fine: ... zsh.x86_64: copying unchanged payload zsh-html.x

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-25 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Rock napsal(a): > all-generic-ide irqpoll > > Without irqpoll it just hangs and without > all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still > need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. Michael, I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's wokring fine. For sure I'm right

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-24 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Rock napsal(a): > btw - I installed your x86_64 rpms that has the ich9 > patch directly on that box but it still will not boot > without all the options. > > --- Michael Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> David wrote: >>> Now there are r

  1   2   >