Hi,
I do have one fileserver, which is compared to other systems slow when
transferring file through the lan.
The test I did get a transfer speed of about 70 - 80 MB/s. I copy files
by rsync or scp from a SSD disk to the servers ISCSI Storage and I
tested to copy to a serverside RAM disk.
I copy
I have the same behavior 6.2 vs latest on my Toshiba satellite.
32-220 boots fine (except for the touchpad and power detection)
32-279.2.1 crashes immediately
Glad to forward logs
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Joseph Koenig wrote:
Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> {snip}
>>
>> So what have I missed?
>>
> Are you doing the test that fails as the 'EXPOSED_USER' in sendmail.mc
> (i.e. root)? That is for intentional exceptions to MASQUERADE_AS so
> you can tell where system
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
>>
>> ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
>> Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6.
> Do you mean there are no binaries in the upstream 6.3 tree for this?
> That is weird, both T
>> Well, sure enough, it can't seem to find any good superblocks. Even
>> backups are showing corrupt. Will reinstall and see what happens...
> You mean the backup superblocks are bad? And it was a running system before?
>
> Is it still under warranty? You might consider talking to Dell about
> che
Joseph Koenig wrote:
>>
>> Odd thought: have you tried a) looking at the drives in the PERC
>> firmware, or b) booting to linux rescue, and examining the filesystems?
> Well, sure enough, it can't seem to find any good superblocks. Even
> backups are showing corrupt. Will reinstall and see what ha
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:27:50 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> > CentOS renamed:
>
> > redhat-release-* -> centos-release
> >
> Will lsb_release -a give the correct result?
>
> mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
>
>
> Odd thought: have you tried a) looking at the drives in the PERC firmware,
> or b) booting to linux rescue, and examining the filesystems?
Well, sure enough, it can't seem to find any good superblocks. Even
backups are showing corrupt. Will reinstall and see what happens...
Thanks!
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> CentOS renamed:
> redhat-release-* -> centos-release
>
Will lsb_release -a give the correct result?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Here is a list of packages for 6.3 for which upstream SRPMS are
available but which aren't built on CentOS.
i686 only (these *are* being built, but won't show up in a x86_64 ls):
xorg-x11-drv-geode
xorg-x11-drv-neomagic
PPC:
iprutils
libehca
libica
librtas
libvpd (still available as rpm)
lsv
Joseph Koenig wrote:
>>> Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is
>>> presenting
>>> drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after
>>> installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.
>>>
>>> Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc
>> Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is presenting
>> drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after
>> installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.
>>
>> Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc again just to make sure
>> th
Joseph Koenig wrote:
>>> Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
>>> I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
>>> (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
>>> top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now i
>> Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
>> I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
>> (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
>> top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up. As
>> it
On 08/20/2012 04:07 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> >Actually, it's a shell alias. And then, only if "vim" is installed,
>> >which it isn't in some configurations. IIRC, desktop systems have him
>> >by default, but server installations do not.
> It is neither a symlink no
Joseph Koenig wrote:
> Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
> I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
> (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
> top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't
On 20.08.2012 18:17, Joseph Koenig wrote:
> Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well,
> so
> I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
> (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off
> the
> top of my head). Went to reboot th
On 08/20/2012 07:02 AM, Janne Snabb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
> published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
> Scientific Linux 6.
>
> The article is available at the following URL:
>
> http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhe
Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
(mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up. As
it starts to
Hello Johnny,
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
>
> ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
> Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6.
Do you mean there are no binaries in the upstream 6.3 tree for this?
That is weird, b
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> People who use the vi however complained that vim is not fully vi compatible
> and
> that they prefer to have a real vi under the name "vi". People who prefer vim
> could still call vim.
My complaint that started this thread turns out
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
wrote:
> > You currently may have the vi source from aprox. 1979 under a 4 clause BSD
> > license or the current Solaris vi under the CDDL. The latter was POSIX
> > compliant approved.
>
> And so you assert that if you don't have a version of vi that is strictly
> compatible with the 1979 source,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> This just verifies that you're playing word games. If you want vi that's
>> not vim, may I ask which *version* of vi you would consider to be vi -
>> one
>> from, say, Sun OS 3? Or from the Irix that ran on our Indigo in the
>> early/mid-nineties? or one from T
wrote:
> This just verifies that you're playing word games. If you want vi that's
> not vim, may I ask which *version* of vi you would consider to be vi - one
> from, say, Sun OS 3? Or from the Irix that ran on our Indigo in the
> early/mid-nineties? or one from Tru-64 in the late nineties? or we
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm usually quite good with sendmail on Centos 5.8 but I must have
> missed something here. I've not done this before but, I want to set
> sendmail so that its outgoing mail appears to come from the domain of
> the network it lives on
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> William Hooper wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
>> wrote:
>> > Reindl Harald wrote:
>> > > you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?
>> >
>> > Of course
>> >
>> > > the topic is about "vi default in CENTOS 6.x" so what
>> >
>> > You
On 08/18/2012 11:21 AM, Vnpenguin wrote:
> Reported by me 4 days ago, but no reply yet. It seams that nobody pays
> attention to that!
>
I'm going to push a new centos-release package either later today or
tomorrow. The fast-track repo definitions ( with enabled=0 ) will be
included there.
--
Reindl Harald wrote:
> > This just verifies that you don't have a vi
>
> boah how often should we explain it until you
> understand taht on CENTOS there is NO vi package
>
> there is only VIM
Nice to see, that you finally realized it too.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (
William Hooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> >
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?
> >
> > Of course
> >
> > > the topic is about "vi default in CENTOS 6.x" so what
> >
> > You seem to missunderstand that t
Here is my research .. I think no action is required, based on the
individual comments:
===
cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
This is built ... not missing (built packages are not named cdrkit, but
instead dirsplit, genisoimage, icedax, wodim)
No Action Required.
===
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?
>
> Of course
>
> > the topic is about "vi default in CENTOS 6.x" so what
>
> You seem to missunderstand that there is a program called "vi" and another
> pr
On 08/20/2012 07:25 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Johnny,
>
> A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only
> relates to one package or those above as well...
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
>>> No mention
Hello Johnny,
A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only
relates to one package or those above as well...
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>> kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
> > No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.
I
Hello,
I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
Scientific Linux 6.
The article is available at the following URL:
http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187
I hope you find
On 08/20/2012 12:41 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Perhaps you can point me to a location where the excluded package are
> documented so I can use that for future reference and save myself some
> time going through all the tech notes?
you need to cycle through the srpms look at exclusivearch
Hello Karanbir,
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:10 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> now remove architecture specific packages, and packages that map to /
> require / use - RH specific services.
Perhaps you can point me to a location where the excluded package are
documented so I can use that for future re
Hello Johnny,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 19:25 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Still leaves:
> CentOS: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6
> RHEL63: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1 Unless dmidecode-2.11-2.el6.src.rpm ==
> dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1.src.rpm this is an update.
> CentOS: gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6
> RHE
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> So, that still leaves the following that I am looking into:
>
> cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
> clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6
> compat-gcc-295-2.95.3-86.el6
> compat-gcc-296-2.96-144.el6
> compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-69.el6
> ding-libs-0.1.2-9.el6
> hunspell-no-2
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.08.2012 13:07, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/16/2012 04:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> >>> vi is generally a symlink to vim these days.
> >>
> >> Actually, it's a shell alias. And then, only if "vim" is installed,
> >> which i
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 04:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> > vi is generally a symlink to vim these days.
>
> Actually, it's a shell alias. And then, only if "vim" is installed,
> which it isn't in some configurations. IIRC, desktop systems have him
> by default, but server install
On 08/19/2012 11:56 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 11:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Producing an accurate list of "missing packages" is tricky -- mainly
>> because you need access to RHN.
> Even though RHN of course is the ultimate resource you can get p
Hi All,
I'm usually quite good with sendmail on Centos 5.8 but I must have
missed something here. I've not done this before but, I want to set
sendmail so that its outgoing mail appears to come from the domain of
the network it lives on. Its real hostname is server2.domain.co.uk ( the
domain b
>
> It's impossible to create a route via a host that can't be resolved by
> ARP (for IPv4).
>
Very true in general - the assumption in IRC was that text is not
always the best medium for transmitting ideas - especially when
someone is specifically anonymising stuff or does not have english as
a f
On 08/19/2012 05:56 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Here is what I found:
now remove architecture specific packages, and packages that map to /
require / use - RH specific services.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo I
45 matches
Mail list logo
