<m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote:
> This just verifies that you're playing word games. If you want vi that's
> not vim, may I ask which *version* of vi you would consider to be vi - one
> from, say, Sun OS 3? Or from the Irix that ran on our Indigo in the
> early/mid-nineties? or one from Tru-64 in the late nineties? or were you
> insisting on one that ran on a system from the early-to-mid-eighties?
SunOS 3 Vi source not available to the public.
Irix Vi source not available to the public.
Tru-64 Vi source not available to the public.
....
You currently may have the vi source from aprox. 1979 under a 4 clause BSD
license
or the current Solaris vi under the CDDL. The latter was POSIX compliant
approved.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
