This time in the "normal" repo or also in testing?
Greetings, j.
verzonden m.b.v Android
vandaar de beknoptheid.
Nux! schreef:
>On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
>> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Jake,
>>>
>>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>>> I see t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Lists wrote:
> >
> Problem isn't so much actual "speed" but causing network monitors to
> freak out due to "high" load average
> when performing backups.
So don't plug the USB into the server. Put them on some other machine
and run the backup over the network.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Lists wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 05:24 AM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> > On Apr 20, 2012 2:42 AM, "Lists" wrote:
> >> Problem as follows:
> >>
> >> 1) Plug in an external USB drive.
> >>
> >> 2) Mount it anywhere. Doesn't matter how.
> >>
> >> 3) Copy a few GB of data
On 04/20/2012 05:24 AM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2012 2:42 AM, "Lists" wrote:
>> Problem as follows:
>>
>> 1) Plug in an external USB drive.
>>
>> 2) Mount it anywhere. Doesn't matter how.
>>
>> 3) Copy a few GB of data to the drive from a non-USB disk.
>>
>> 4) Watch the load average
On 04/26/2012 03:46 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 02:18 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Hey Y'all,
>>
>> I just installed the updates recommended by Software Update.
>>
>> Apr 25 19:04:43 Updated: xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686
>> Apr 25 19:04:53 Updated: firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686
>>
On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
>> sc
On 04/25/2012 10:18 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> I just installed the updates recommended by Software Update.
>
> Apr 25 19:04:43 Updated: xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686
> Apr 25 19:04:53 Updated: firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686
> Apr 25 19:05:03 Updated: thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el6.
On 04/26/2012 05:45 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Shaun
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:34
>>
>> On 26/04/2012 15:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> You can't really generalize about that. Yum just does what the
>>> dependencies of the rpm packages you install or r
On 04/24/2012 10:58 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs /
>> tutorials for CentOS available?
>
> You dont need rpms: the libvirt directly use the LXC API.
> A tutorial: http://goo.gl/kQOxm
>
there are some limitations with libvirt/lx
On 04/26/2012 01:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> Yes, that's a horrible thing for servers.
>> I've said it before, and I'll say it again: enterprise != servers.
> How's that? What kind of enterprise doesn't have some servers with
> nailed down N
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> >> Yes, that's a horrible thing for servers.
>> > I've said it before, and I'll say it again: enterprise != servers.
>
>> How's that?
>
> A distribution being an 'enterprise' distribution does not equate with that
> distribution being an (ex
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 02:12:20 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >> Yes, that's a horrible thing for servers.
> > I've said it before, and I'll say it again: enterprise != servers.
> How's that?
A distribution being an 'enterprise' distributio
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's a horrible thing for servers.
>
> I've said it before, and I'll say it again: enterprise != servers.
How's that? What kind of enterprise doesn't have some servers with
nailed down NICs?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 01:28:04 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:36 AM, James B. Byrne
> wrote:
> > Now, consider upstream's decision to enable network-manager by default on an
> > enterprise distro. THAT I both understand and fundamentally disagree with.
> Yes, that's a
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:36 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> I used to think the same thing. However, on reflection I think that the
> decision
> to keep the network down until deliberately enabled is a sensible and prudent
> security choice. This leaves up to the operator the decision as to whe
On Thu, April 26, 2012 08:55, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> It has the network stack ... you must configure it during the install.
>>
>> If you do not configure and enable the ethernet card then it does not
>> turn on by default ... but it is in the installer to be able to do:
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Shaun wrote:
>
>> You can't really generalize about that. Yum just does what the
>> dependencies of the rpm packages you install or remove tell it to do.
>> A "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop Environment'" might bring back
>> anything that is missing.
>>
>
> We
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaun
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:34
>
> On 26/04/2012 15:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > You can't really generalize about that. Yum just does what the
> > dependencies of the rpm packages you install or remove tell
> it to do.
> > A "yum groupinstall
On 26/04/2012 15:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
> You can't really generalize about that. Yum just does what the
> dependencies of the rpm packages you install or remove tell it to do.
> A "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop Environment'" might bring back
> anything that is missing.
>
Well I was kinda e
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Shaun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a bit of a newbie to CentOS though not Linux in general. I come from
> an apt-get package management mentality and I've had a few issues where
> package management actions haven't quite done what I'd expect. So I'm
> guessing it's use
Shaun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a bit of a newbie to CentOS though not Linux in general. I come from
> an apt-get package management mentality and I've had a few issues where
> package management actions haven't quite done what I'd expect. So I'm
> guessing it's user error! :)
Personally, having st
Hi all,
I'm a bit of a newbie to CentOS though not Linux in general. I come from
an apt-get package management mentality and I've had a few issues where
package management actions haven't quite done what I'd expect. So I'm
guessing it's user error! :)
I installed GNOME and then decided that I wan
On 04/25/2012 01:02 AM, Al Sparks wrote:
>
> You're right. The stack was there.
>
> First, I was inaccurate when I said I installed 6.2. I actually installed
> 6.0, and later updated via yum.
>
> Second, yeah I was able to start the network service, so there was a stack.
> All I'd get would be
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:02:49PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
>
>
> You're right. The stack was there.
>
> First, I was inaccurate when I said I installed 6.2. I actually installed
> 6.0, and later updated via yum.
>
> Second, yeah I was able to start the network service, so there was a stack.
On 04/26/2012 02:18 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> I just installed the updates recommended by Software Update.
>
> Apr 25 19:04:43 Updated: xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686
> Apr 25 19:04:53 Updated: firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686
> Apr 25 19:05:03 Updated: thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el6.
Hello,
On CentOS-6.2, these two commands (on the same machine) give me
different results :
# restorecon -r /var/www/html/Centos/ # (as root)
$ sudo restorecon -r /var/www/html/Centos/ # (as an unprivileged user)
/var/www/html/Centos/ is a symlink to /mnt/packages/Centos/
In the first case
27 matches
Mail list logo
