On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
>
>> >> Yes, that's a horrible thing for servers.
>> > I've said it before, and I'll say it again: enterprise != servers.
>
>> How's that?
>
> A distribution being an 'enterprise' distribution does not equate with that
> distribution being an (exclusively) 'server' distribution. While CentOS
> makes a great server distribution, that is a subset of what an enterprise
> distribution needs to be able to do.
>
> And I've not had any NetworkManager issues with my upstream EL6.2 box running
> a local GUI, xrdp and vnc, some reverse ssh tunnels for remote maintenance of
> some dynamically addressed, behind-the-NAT boxes, among other things
> (development CMS/web serving, CIFS shares, and more, including a test OpenNMS
> instance). Multiple NICs, multiple subnets, and solid as a rock with nailed
> up addresses, running with NetworkManager. I've thus far not seen any of the
> issues others have seen, once I remembered to set up networking at install,
> and remembered the two checkboxes to check (which I've posted before on this
> list).
But what is the point of running a daemon to manage something where
you explicitly never, ever, under any circumstances want it to change,
even if you are sometimes lucky about that part?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
