[CentOS] Centos 6x86_64: no hypervisor options were found for this connection

2011-12-03 Thread Jason Pyeron
After following http://itscblog.tamu.edu/startup-guide-for-kvm-on-centos-6/ (because I found out that vmware server 2 does not work on centos 6) I go to the point where I tried to create a new VM in the virt-manager. At that point I get "no hypervisor options were found for this connection" in the

Re: [CentOS] syncing imap servers with imapsync

2011-12-03 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 00:15 -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hi Craig, > > > > if so, you need to configure it for login/plain, something like this... > > > > # grep sasl_mech_list /etc/imapd.conf > > sasl_mech_list: plain login gssapi external > > > > Probably don't need the gssapi or external > > T

Re: [CentOS] syncing imap servers with imapsync

2011-12-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hi Craig, > if so, you need to configure it for login/plain, something like this... > > # grep sasl_mech_list /etc/imapd.conf > sasl_mech_list: plain login gssapi external > > Probably don't need the gssapi or external Thanks for your reply. The zimbra side (server1) is logging in fine. The pro

Re: [CentOS] syncing imap servers with imapsync

2011-12-03 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 04:00 +, Tim Dunphy wrote: > hello list, > > I am attempting to sync two imap servers using the imapsync perl script. It > seems handy and easy. > > > Here's what happens when I try to do this: > > # > # Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the

[CentOS] syncing imap servers with imapsync

2011-12-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
hello list, I am attempting to sync two imap servers using the imapsync perl script. It seems handy and easy. Here's what happens when I try to do this: # # Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format # of the file, see the master(5) manual page (command: "man 5 mast

[CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Can't open port 53 for Bind (DNS)

2011-12-03 Thread Weplica
It's work, it was listening only localhost!!! Thanks you very much Quoting John Broome : > On Dec 3, 2011, at 18:46, Weplica wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have CentOS 6 on a dedicated server. I haver bind 9.7 but I can't >> reach port 53 for DNS. >> >> >> netstat -na | grep LISTEN >> >> tcp 0 0

Re: [CentOS] Can't open port 53 for Bind (DNS)

2011-12-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/03/11 3:46 PM, Weplica wrote: > I have CentOS 6 on a dedicated server. I haver bind 9.7 but I can't > reach port 53 for DNS. > > > netstat -na | grep LISTEN > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:953 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 127.0

Re: [CentOS] Can't open port 53 for Bind (DNS)

2011-12-03 Thread John Broome
On Dec 3, 2011, at 18:46, Weplica wrote: > Hello, > > I have CentOS 6 on a dedicated server. I haver bind 9.7 but I can't > reach port 53 for DNS. > > > netstat -na | grep LISTEN > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:953 0.0.0.0:* LIST

[CentOS] Can't open port 53 for Bind (DNS)

2011-12-03 Thread Weplica
Hello, I have CentOS 6 on a dedicated server. I haver bind 9.7 but I can't reach port 53 for DNS. netstat -na | grep LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:953 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 :::80 :::*

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/03/11 2:11 PM, Beartooth wrote: > I don't have that kind of access to any http server. in a pinch, enable IIS on a windows system. its a bit funky, but it works just fine for this sort of thing. or any linux box, you could install httpd on. this is just for access on your local network

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread RILINDO FOSTER
Here is one for the net install: http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-netinstall.iso And for the live media: http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-LiveCD.iso Alternatively, there is always bit torrent. On Dec 3, 2011, at 5:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS5 w winbind samba integrated w Win2k8 AD

2011-12-03 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, james wrote: > Is anyone out there using CentOS5 integrated correctly with a Windows 2008 > domain so that active directory authentication can be used for samba > shares? Yes, I use it with 2008 with the SFU attributes present. The standard samba3x packages are sufficient.

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread Beartooth
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:29:23 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> copy the ISO contents to a local http server, point at that. > There is also option to install from LiveDVD, and then just install the > missing packages. I don't have that kind of access to any http server. But mighty fe

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/03/2011 09:48 PM, John R Pierce piše: > On 12/03/11 12:40 PM, david wrote: >> With 6.0, I had to use the Net-Install. Unfortunately, I had to do >> it about 5 times because of errors I made, plus problems that existed >> between ZFS and Centos. Each time I did it, I waited the needed >>

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/03/11 12:40 PM, david wrote: > With 6.0, I had to use the Net-Install. Unfortunately, I had to do > it about 5 times because of errors I made, plus problems that existed > between ZFS and Centos. Each time I did it, I waited the needed > hours for each download. Fortunately, my ISP doesn't

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread david
At 12:32 PM 12/3/2011, you wrote: >Have you thought about installing it from the network? Just burn a >net install.iso, boot off from there, and at the network install >prompt, enter path one of the mirrors. > >After that, you are set. > >On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Beartooth wrote: > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/03/11 12:20 PM, Beartooth wrote: > I haven't managed to get hold of any DVD-R media, and the machine > I particularly want to install on seems not to be able to see double- > sided (which I do have). (It's not exactly a new PC.) double SIDED? or do you mean double layer? I've never s

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread RILINDO FOSTER
Have you thought about installing it from the network? Just burn a net install.iso, boot off from there, and at the network install prompt, enter path one of the mirrors. After that, you are set. On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Beartooth wrote: > > I haven't managed to get hold of any DVD-R

[CentOS] 6.1 .iso size?

2011-12-03 Thread Beartooth
I haven't managed to get hold of any DVD-R media, and the machine I particularly want to install on seems not to be able to see double- sided (which I do have). (It's not exactly a new PC.) So I can't get 6.0 onto it in the usual way. But I can wait till 6.1 comes out; it is pos

Re: [CentOS] remote syslog question

2011-12-03 Thread fred smith
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:30:14PM -0500, fred smith wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:21:25PM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith: > > > I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's > > > system events. Works fine. > > > > > > however

Re: [CentOS] remote syslog question

2011-12-03 Thread fred smith
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:21:25PM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith: > > I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's > > system events. Works fine. > > > > however, it mixes 'em into /var/log/messages along with the messages > > from t

Re: [CentOS] remote syslog question

2011-12-03 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith: > I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's > system events. Works fine. > > however, it mixes 'em into /var/log/messages along with the messages > from the Centos box itself. > > is there a way to separate them into itsown (set

Re: [CentOS] remote syslog question

2011-12-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/03/2011 03:35 AM, Corey Henderson piše: >>> I am in professional wireless business. My solution was to deinstall >>> syslog and install syslog-ng, it's supports separation based on IP, >>> name, etc.. >> >> thanks. I was hoping for some kind of hack so I wouldn't need to do that. >> > > F