Re: [CentOS] Help me

Hi, Yes I know what your saying ok! I didn't ask him any descent question but I gave a solution based on my experience. So why hell r u guy's coming after me and as you said in the world of IT there are lot of perhaps OK buddy. Regards, Sadaruwan On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Spiro Harvey, K

Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

hello, --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5 > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 2:27 PM > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Scott Silva > <

Re: [CentOS] Help me

ISPConfig or anything but it was my net drivers but after installing the proper once I didn't got that problem ever again. So that's why I gave him this solution. And the other thing if you know more or a better way just tall him don't try to correct others ok. Because your solution was likely f

Re: [CentOS] Help me

Hi, Mr. Ian, Yes I know what I've said might be little dangerous but I got same kind of problem in my CentOS system and it was nothing to do with the ISPConfig or anything but it was my net drivers but after installing the proper once I didn't got that problem ever again. So that'

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Craig White wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 23:28 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >>> Craig White wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 21:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am doing some tes

Re: [CentOS] Re: restarting static-routes-ipv6

Scott Silva wrote: on 8-26-2008 3:57 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? Change the routes in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 then manually add them with the

Re: [CentOS] restarting static-routes-ipv6

Barry Brimer wrote: Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? I know about ifup and ifdown for interfaces, but what about routing (and IP6 at that). Ha

[CentOS] Re: restarting static-routes-ipv6

on 8-26-2008 3:57 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? Change the routes in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 then manually add them with the route command. Exam

Re: [CentOS] restarting static-routes-ipv6

Quoting Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 > and NOT restart the network. > > Is there a way to do this??? > > I know about ifup and ifdown for interfaces, but what about routing (and > IP6 at that). Have you tried /etc/sy

Re: [CentOS] slow Perl on CentOS 5

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this >>> blog: >>> >>> http://blog.vipul.net/200

[CentOS] restarting static-routes-ipv6

I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? I know about ifup and ifdown for interfaces, but what about routing (and IP6 at that). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@c

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

Jeff Kinz wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:04:21PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? In addition the rest of the good info others already posted for you, please remember that "128 bit

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

Jerry Geis wrote: Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? I am not familiar with this at all. The newest 'player' in this is HIP. Code and docs at http://infrahip.hiit.fi/. But HIP is NOT tunneling in the 'classic' IPnIP

Re: [CentOS] OT: Port Scan

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or something I should file a support ticket about? TIA!

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 17:14 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Lanny: that line goes in /etc/fstab > > > > Indeed. Thank, Nicolas, for noticing this. I have amended the wiki > > page to make it clearer. > > Akemi: If it

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> >>> I have dkms now. On the wiki, it says: >>> to mount read-write: >>> /dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umas

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su - >> Password: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win ntfs-3g >> rw,umask=,defaults 0 0 > > What do you think this "command" does? > >> -bash: /dev/hda6: P

Re: [CentOS] Re: how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 2:02 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> When you ran: >>> >>> yum install fuse fuse-ntfs-3g dkms dkms-fuse >>> >>> did

Re: [CentOS] OT: Port Scan

Lanny Marcus wrote: I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or something I should file a support ticket about? TIA! Port State Service 21 open ftp 22 open ssh 25 open smtp 80 open http 110 open pop3 143

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

Lanny Marcus wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su - > Password: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win ntfs-3g > rw,umask=,defaults 0 0 What do you think this "command" does? > -bash: /dev/hda6: Permission denied Sure. You just tried to execute a partition. Ralph pgpF6EkIt8Stg.pg

Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 2:08 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following: >> >> Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5

[CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

on 8-26-2008 2:08 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following: Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ Summar

[CentOS] Re: loading modules across reboots

on 8-26-2008 12:57 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: I have a CentOS 5.2 install on a machine with the Marvell nic issue outlined in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2612. I have a few questions regarding this, what does the # echo "11ab 4364" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/sky2/new_id line do?

[CentOS] Re: how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

on 8-26-2008 2:02 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, the documentat

Re: [CentOS] slow Perl on CentOS 5

Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ Summary: The Upstream Vendor version of Perl has a patch to the "

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> >> I have dkms now. On the wiki, it says: >> to mount read-write: >> /dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umask=,defaults 0 0 >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win n

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Actually, the documentation is here: >>> >>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsA

RE: [CentOS] loading modules across reboots

>possibly the driver as delivered doesn't recognize that specific version >of the device, so needs a nudge to handle this specific device ID ? > >[this is purely a wild a** guess] Ok, so I see this on boot: Bringing up interface eth0: [ OK ] Bringing up interface eth1: sky2 device eth1 does no

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

Lanny Marcus wrote: I have dkms now. On the wiki, it says: to mount read-write: /dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umask=,defaults 0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umask=,defaults 0 0-bash: /dev/hda6: Permission denied Lanny: that line goes in /etc

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Actually, the documentation is here: >>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTr

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> MHR wrote: I routinely build a kernel with NTFS rea

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 13:10 -0700, MHR wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well... if you go for the fuse/dkms route, you will lose the chance to > > build the module upon kernel update. :-) > > > > True - decisions, decisions, Well you can

Re: [CentOS] loading modules across reboots

Joseph L. Casale wrote: 11AB 4364 are likely the PCI Vendor/Device IDs. # lspci 00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12) # lspci -n 00:00.0 0200: 11ab:4364 (rev 12) Yup, so what was the significance of this requirement

Re: [CentOS] OT: Port Scan

Les Mikesell wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or something I should file a support ticket about? TIA! Port State Service 21 open ftp 22 open ssh 25 open smtp 80 open ht

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Actually, the documentation is here: >> >> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFSPartitions > > Akemi: Thank you. I discovered that I need fuse an

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:04:21PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel > between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? In addition the rest of the good info others already posted for you, please remember that "128 bit encryption" doesn't mean

Re: [CentOS] OT: Port Scan

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking >> at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or >> something I should file a support ticket about? TIA! >> >>

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

Jerry Geis wrote: Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? I am not familiar with this at all. If you just need to forward a port or two, ssh is probably fine. If you need true IP-to-IP connectivity, that's called VPN. Ther

RE: [CentOS] loading modules across reboots

>11AB 4364 are likely the PCI Vendor/Device IDs. # lspci 00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12) # lspci -n 00:00.0 0200: 11ab:4364 (rev 12) Yup, so what was the significance of this requirement after loading the module? I as

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 14:31 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > MHR wrote: > >> > >> > >> So, to clarify: when an issue is solved, modify the subject: line so > >> to indicate and do NOT start a new thread? > >> > >> Foo - I

Re: [CentOS] OT: Port Scan

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking >> at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or >> something I should file a support ticket about? TIA! >> >> Po

RE: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2boxes

Jerry Geis wrote: > > Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit > encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? > > I am not familiar with this at all. If it's just shell access, then ssh of course! If it's HTTP use HTTPS! If it's SMTP use TLS. And so on... If it's for

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:04:21 -0400 > Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel > > between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? > > ssh Or openvpn. Both available with more than 128 bits (but that really depe

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

Jerry Geis wrote: Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? I am not familiar with this at all. either ssh tunnels, or for more flexiblity, you might look into OpenVPN which supports routed or bridged virtual networks over a

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

Joseph L. Casale wrote: My understanding is that --dport can only specify a single port (--dport 80) or port range (--dport 137:139) inclusive. Use of the multiport module allows up to 15 ports (or port ranges) to be specified. Ned, So to write --dport 5060,1:6 you need to write: -m mul

Re: [CentOS] loading modules across reboots

Joseph L. Casale wrote: I have a CentOS 5.2 install on a machine with the Marvell nic issue outlined in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2612. I have a few questions regarding this, what does the # echo "11ab 4364" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/sky2/new_id line do? Obviously it starts right after bu

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> MHR wrote: I routinely build a kernel with NTFS rea

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well... if you go for the fuse/dkms route, you will lose the chance to > build the module upon kernel update. :-) > True - decisions, decisions, mhr ___ CentOS mailing list C

Re: [CentOS] OT: Port Scan

Lanny Marcus wrote: I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or something I should file a support ticket about? TIA! Port State Service 21 open ftp 22 open ssh 25 open smtp 80 open http 110 open pop3 143 op

Re: [CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:04:21 -0400 Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel > between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? ssh -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com __

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:52 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Amen. Another thing I learned about, after someone on the list >> explained that it was happening, is that when using Gmail on the web, >> it apparently

[CentOS] establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between centos 5.2 boxes

Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? I am not familiar with this at all. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:57 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing >> fuse-ntfs-3g from rpmforge? Fuse (from rf) gets rebuilt for ne

[CentOS] loading modules across reboots

I have a CentOS 5.2 install on a machine with the Marvell nic issue outlined in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2612. I have a few questions regarding this, what does the # echo "11ab 4364" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/sky2/new_id line do? Obviously it starts right after but what specifically is the

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> MHR wrote: >>> >>> I routinely build a kernel with NTFS read/write support whenever a new >>> kernel comes out, partly to get the support

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing > fuse-ntfs-3g from rpmforge? Fuse (from rf) gets rebuilt for new kernels by > dkms, so it's painless on kernel updates. Yes, but the p

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MHR wrote: >> >> I routinely build a kernel with NTFS read/write support whenever a new >> kernel comes out, partly to get the support > > this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Amen. Another thing I learned about, after someone on the list > explained that it was happening, is that when using Gmail on the web, > it apparently defaults to sending HTML, which *never* is something I > want to do. I

[CentOS] OT: Port Scan

I just did a port scan on one of my web sites. Shared Hosting. Looking at ports 1863, 3000 and 3001. Are those ports normally open or something I should file a support ticket about? TIA! Port State Service 21 open ftp 22 open ssh 25 open smtp 80 open http 110 open pop3 143 open imap 443 open https

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

MHR wrote: I routinely build a kernel with NTFS read/write support whenever a new kernel comes out, partly to get the support this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing fuse-ntfs-3g from rpmforge? Fuse (from rf) gets rebuilt for new kernels by dkms, so it's

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MHR wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in >>> the >>> mailheaders, you end up creating a

RE: [CentOS] iptables question

>My understanding is that --dport can only specify a single port (--dport >80) or port range (--dport 137:139) inclusive. Use of the multiport >module allows up to 15 ports (or port ranges) to be specified. Ned, So to write --dport 5060,1:6 you need to write: -m multiport -p udp -dport 506

Re: [CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 9:06 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: > > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> >> >>Hi Ralph, >> >>That is one full line: >> >>

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can certainly help. So, from what you wrote I suppose you > encountered the same dependency problem and then manually installed > unifdef. Was this indeed the case? Also, this happened on an x86_64 > system? > Yes,

Re: [CentOS] postfix mysql_pgsql update?

Karanbir Singh wrote: John Thomas wrote: Should postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql be updated for: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0839.html and, if so, may I humbly request it? I will look into this today, at the moment the openssh issue takes priority! News on that front in the

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I, for one, dont think its worth wasting time with the SOLVED word in the > subject lines. noone searches through achieves with the word 'SOLVED' in > there. > Actually, if I thought I would find it on a reliable basis,

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:12 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I remember running into this a while back. That being the case, >>> shouldn't unifd

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I remember running into this a while back. That being the case, >> shouldn't unifdef be included in kernel-devel, or at least one of the >> packages that

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

MHR wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in the mailheaders, you end up creating a new thread each time. so can you not do that please ? Hmm - I did that on purpose because (I tho

Re: [CentOS] Re: (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 8-26-2008 4:16 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: >>> >>> by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in >>> the mai

Re: [CentOS] (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in the > mailheaders, you end up creating a new thread each time. so can you not do > that please ? > Hmm - I did that on purpose because (I thought)

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

Joseph L. Casale wrote: When do you know you need the "-m multiport" option? I see examples with -dport xx:xxx for example that sometimes use it and sometimes don't? I have read the man page and see what "-m multiport" requires, but don't see the requirement involving its use. Thanks! jlc I'

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command >> he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe >> nailed this on

Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command > he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe > nailed this one a little earlier in the thread with unifdef.x86_64 > needing to be in

[CentOS] iptables question

When do you know you need the "-m multiport" option? I see examples with -dport xx:xxx for example that sometimes use it and sometimes don't? I have read the man page and see what "-m multiport" requires, but don't see the requirement involving its use. Thanks! jlc __

Re: [CentOS] specialix module

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am wondering if it is possible to just grab the specialix.c file > and compile that one module (not the entire kernel) and of course load that > module > and have it work. > > Is that possible? Usually, yes. But be wary of dif

[CentOS] specialix module

I am wondering if it is possible to just grab the specialix.c file and compile that one module (not the entire kernel) and of course load that module and have it work. Is that possible? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.ce

RE: [CentOS] apache

Jeff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Mad Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can I do the following > > > > vi /etc/sysconfig/httpd > > > > # Configuration file for the httpd service. > > > > # > > # The default processing model (MPM) is the process-based > > # 'prefork' model. A thread

Re: [CentOS] apache

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Mad Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can I do the following > > vi /etc/sysconfig/httpd > > # Configuration file for the httpd service. > > # > # The default processing model (MPM) is the process-based > # 'prefork' model. A thread-based model, 'worker', is also

Re: [CentOS] Re: (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 4:16 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: >> >> by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in >> the mailheaders, you end up creating a new thread each time. so can you not >> do that

[CentOS] Re: apache

on 8-26-2008 8:11 AM Mad Unix spake the following: Can I do the following Ian's previous post about setting variables in /etc/sysconfig/httpd is correct. Define the vars in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, and make sure you export them there. This is the intended use and the 'redhat' me

Re: [CentOS] slow Perl on CentOS 5

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: > > http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ > > In a nutshell: some Perl apps are 100x slower on RedHat / CentOS 5 compared >

[CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

on 8-26-2008 9:06 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi Ralph, That is one full line: #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&

Re: [CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi Ralph, >> >> That is one full line: >> >> #mirrorlist= >> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=addons< >> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=addons

[CentOS] Re: Slow Xen on CentOS 5.2?

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After I updated the system, Xen takes an unusable startup time. Every Guess what, Virtual Dave (http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/VMware/Server/Clock+on+CentOS) is right. Just disable cpuspeed. Thank you, Virtual Dave --

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Rainer Traut wrote: > Ok, think I found the cause... > > The server I try to install to has heartbeat/cluster software installed. > I already has a group with GID 90: Makes sense then, where did heartbeat/cluster software come from? If it's a supported package on RHEL-based systems it shouldn't ad

[CentOS] Re: (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

on 8-26-2008 4:16 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: MHR wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:33 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a setting somewhere in the "global" arena of CentOS that controls whether or not "hidden" (.prefixed) files are displayed in file lists? Never mind -

[CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

Hi Ralph, That is one full line: #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=addons But as you can see, it's commented out, so it shouldn't even be read, right? What does

Re: [CentOS] apache

Can I do the following vi /etc/sysconfig/httpd # Configuration file for the httpd service. # # The default processing model (MPM) is the process-based # 'prefork' model. A thread-based model, 'worker', is also # available, but does not work with some modules (such as PHP). # The service must be

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Ok, think I found the cause... The server I try to install to has heartbeat/cluster software installed. I already has a group with GID 90: # grep 90 /etc/group haclient:x:90: The postfix rpm has hardcoded: /usr/sbin/groupadd -g 90 -r postdrop 2>/dev/null So that's the reason I get the messages.

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Thx for your answer. Ned Slider schrieb: Rainer Traut wrote: Trying to switch from sendmail to postfix I did: # yum remove sendmail which resulted in erasing of: mdadm sendmail-doc sendmail sendmail-cf mutt fetchmail redhat-lsb I did then: yum -y install redhat-lsb.x86_64 postfix and got t

Re: [CentOS] apache

Jim Perrin wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Mad Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i did the following, created a startup script [EMAIL PROTECTED] script]$ cat start_apache.sh #!/bin/bash ORACLE_BASE=/u01/oracle ORACLE_HOME=/u01/oracle/10g ORACLE_SID=king LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/lib

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Rainer Traut wrote: > No NIS or LDAP, plain local files. I haven't tried CentOS 5.2 yet(keep seeing reports of issues), postfix in 5.1 worked fine for me and in 4.x. I suggest just adding the group manually and removing/re-installing the postfix rpm. Perhaps there is a bug in the 5.2 RPM that doe

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

nate schrieb: Rainer Traut wrote: I checked and indeed there is no group postdrop on the system. On an El5 system I see the group. Are you using any sort of network authentication system like NIS or LDAP? Or just standard local files? No NIS or LDAP, plain local files. Rainer ___

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Rainer Traut wrote: Hi, sys: Centos 5.2 x86_64 Trying to switch from sendmail to postfix I did: # yum remove sendmail which resulted in erasing of: mdadm sendmail-doc sendmail sendmail-cf mutt fetchmail redhat-lsb I did then: yum -y install redhat-lsb.x86_64 postfix and got this error:

Re: [CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Rainer Traut wrote: > I checked and indeed there is no group postdrop on the system. > On an El5 system I see the group. > Are you using any sort of network authentication system like NIS or LDAP? Or just standard local files? nate ___ CentOS mailing

[CentOS] postfix install error: fatal file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter setgid_group: unknown group name: postdrop

Hi, sys: Centos 5.2 x86_64 Trying to switch from sendmail to postfix I did: # yum remove sendmail which resulted in erasing of: mdadm sendmail-doc sendmail sendmail-cf mutt fetchmail redhat-lsb I did then: yum -y install redhat-lsb.x86_64 postfix and got this error: Installing: postfi

[CentOS] Slow Xen on CentOS 5.2?

Hello, Should Xen still work on CentOS 5.2 with 1GB RAM? On my Toshiba Satellite notebook Xen performed reasonably well as of CentOS 5.0. After I updated the system, Xen takes an unusable startup time. Every task at boot, since nash is fired, seems to take increasingly longer. I can't seem to find

Re: [CentOS] OT - Offline uncorrectable sectors

William L. Maltby ha scritto: >From "man badblocks": > > -n Use non-destructive read-write mode. By default only a non- >destructive read-only test is done. This option must not be >combined with the -w option, as they are mutually exclusive. > > Note the phrase begi

Re: [CentOS] virt-install error: "virDomainLookupByName() failed got unknown HTTP error code 400"

I found what it was: there were some incomplete virtual machine configuration files in /etc/xen which I'd generated for testing previously. Because they weren't complete and their IDs weren't attached to any actual VM, they were screwing up any calls to virDomainLookupByName() . Removing them d

  1   2   >