Johnny Hughes wrote:
And in this case, the precedents of hundreds years of contractual law
would have to be overturned. The GPL license covers source code
access. The RHEL license covers binary access without restricting your
rights towards source code.
I don't recall any distinction between
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=
The rest is available for review at the linked address ... but it is
very clear that if you have any RHEL subscriptions, th
Les Mikesell wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
And in this case, the precedents of hundreds years of contractual law
would have to be overturned. The GPL license covers source code
access. The RHEL license covers binary access without restricting your
rights towards source code.
I don't reca
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The usual idea is that because its "Free" Software you can't restrict
> it in anyway... and that the 'Freedom' trumps any other license or
> agreement. And I will bet that if you have enough money, there will be
>
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
And in this case, the precedents of hundreds years of contractual law
would have to be overturned. The GPL license covers source code
access. The RHEL license covers binary access without restricting your
rights towards source code.
I don't recall any distinction be
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> =
>
> The rest is available for review at the linked address ... but it is
> very clear that if you have any RHEL subscriptions, then you must pay
> for
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 15:48 -0700, Arwen Smith wrote:
> Hello List
> I'm installing a PDC with ldap using smbldap tools (IDEALX) it's
> allready configured but when i try to add an user using
> smbldap-useradd -m user it throw the following error:
>
> Error looking for next uid at /opt/IDEALX/sbin
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:29:54PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can not redistribute the redhat-logos or redhat-artwork binary
packages to others unless you are selling your media. You also can not
distribute those 2 source or binary RPMS without
Hi Guys,
Any known reasons why PHP 5 (Centos 5) might be segfaulting on an Asus A7V8X
mobo with an Athlon 2400XP (1GB RAM). Everything else works fine and I had
done some system/RAM tests so I am pretty sure the hardware's OK. Here's
what I have found:
Vanilla CentOS 5 - PHP segfaults
yum remove/
Hello List
I'm installing a PDC with ldap using smbldap tools (IDEALX) it's allready
configured but when i try to add an user using smbldap-useradd -m user it throw
the following error:
Error looking for next uid at /opt/IDEALX/sbin//smbldap_tools.pm line 993.
can any body help me
regard
Roi
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:01:13PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> >> What we need is a case that's been taken to court and a verdict given.
> >> :)
> >
> > umm -- Istro
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:29:54PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> You can not redistribute the redhat-logos or redhat-artwork binary
> >> packages to others unless you are selling your media
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:01:13PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
>> What we need is a case that's been taken to court and a verdict given.
>> :)
>
> umm -- Istrongly disagree.
>
> There are services sold by people called 'lawyers' whom sell authoritative
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What we need is a case that's been taken to court and a verdict given.
:)
umm -- Istrongly disagree.
There are services sold by people called 'lawyers' whom sell
authoritative analysis, guidance, and answers they'll stand
behind as a professional t
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You can not redistribute the redhat-logos or redhat-artwork binary
packages to others unless you are selling your media. You also can not
distribute those 2 source or binary RPMS without editing and removing the
logos / trademark related things in them. Since the ISOs i
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:29:54PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> You can not redistribute the redhat-logos or redhat-artwork binary
>> packages to others unless you are selling your media. You also can not
>> distribute those 2 source or binary RPMS without editing and re
Johnny Hughes wrote:
You can not redistribute the redhat-logos or redhat-artwork binary
packages to others unless you are selling your media. You also can
not distribute those 2 source or binary RPMS without editing and
removing the logos / trademark related things in them. Since the ISOs
in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:50:26 +0100
Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mag Gam a écrit :
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no
There is no illegal version of RHEL. When you buy from RH, you
are not buying RHEL, but support and updates for the
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:50:26 +0100
Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mag Gam a écrit :
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no
There is no illegal version of RHEL. When you buy from RH, you
are not buying RHEL, but suppo
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:50:26 +0100
Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mag Gam a écrit :
> > Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no
There is no illegal version of RHEL. When you buy from RH, you
are not buying RHEL, but support and updates for the particular
version of R
On Saturday 22 March 2008 13:15:38 Sam Drinkard wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I finally got spamass-milter and clamav-milter running, but have one
> error I've not been able to determine what is happening. From the log
> entry I see this line:
>
> SYSERR(sa-milt): hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /et
Hello all,
I finally got spamass-milter and clamav-milter running, but have one
error I've not been able to determine what is happening. From the log
entry I see this line:
SYSERR(sa-milt): hash map "Alias0": unsafe map file /etc/aliases.db: Permission
denied: 39 Time(s)
any pointers here?
Hi...
Ran into an interesting issue during the past week, and figured I'd post the
issue, and solution here in case it might come in handy for someone else...
The laptop was running, but it was left on with the lid closed for a day or
so.. when powered up, the laptop went into a state saying it c
23 matches
Mail list logo
