Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
And in this case, the precedents of hundreds years of contractual law would have to be overturned. The GPL license covers source code access. The RHEL license covers binary access without restricting your rights towards source code.
I don't recall any distinction between what you can do with binaries and source mentioned in the GPL beyond the requirement that sources must be made available too. And section 6 (of GPLv2) states explictly that "You may not impose any further restrictions...". Of course not all of RHEL is covered by the GPL.
-- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
