Hi People,
This may be slightly off topic if so please let me know. My situation
is I have a bunch of Fedora clients connecting to a CentOS Printer
server (setup using cups). I have gone through and used Vendor supplied
ppd files where possible. And basic printing is working. But, Duplex
Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
I have never understood this. If I have a good, strong password that
nobody
knows, how is changing it to another one an improvement over what I already
have?
<<
Correct. Modern thinking is to teach people how to create a good, strong
password and then sti
Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:36:03 -0500
Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And above all, because I know many admins slack on this, and I'm
guilty of it as well if it's not forced... ROTATE your passwords
periodically
I have never understood this. If I have a good, strong pass
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 10:14 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig White wrote:
We will work also with the Red Hat Security team and see if we can
isolate any issues that might be FIXABLE.
doesn't this almost beg for upstream to make denyhosts a base install
and aut
>I have never understood this.
Exactly why you should be more proactive, if it matters in your environment.
>If I have a good, strong password that nobody
>knows
Do you know this?
CMIIW,
But an example from the windows world would be *if* someone sniffed the hash of
an admin login, then took it
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:36:03 -0500
Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And above all, because I know many admins slack on this, and I'm
> guilty of it as well if it's not forced... ROTATE your passwords
> periodically
I have never understood this. If I have a good, strong password that nobod
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 22:19 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 10:14 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> > >>
> > >> We will work also with the Red Hat Security team and see if we can
> > >> isolate any issues that might be FIXABLE.
> > >
> > > doesn't
Along the lines of staying safe, now is probably a good time to check
your password policies.
1. Don't allow root access to ssh. (modify /etc/ssh/sshd_config)
2. restrict root logins to only the local machine. (modify /etc/securetty)
3. Limit users with access to 'su' to the wheel group (use visud
On Jan 28, 2008 10:14 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> >>
> >> We will work also with the Red Hat Security team and see if we can
> >> isolate any issues that might be FIXABLE.
> >
> > doesn't this almost beg for upstream to make denyhosts a base install
> > a
Craig White wrote:
We will work also with the Red Hat Security team and see if we can
isolate any issues that might be FIXABLE.
doesn't this almost beg for upstream to make denyhosts a base install
and automatically on, just as sshd is automatically on?
I've always wondered why a progra
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 19:55 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Here is the applicable article:
> >
> > http://www.linux.com/feature/125548
> >
> > There are links in the above article that explain tests for the system
> > and what is currently known about the rootkit.
> >
>
On 1/28/08, Alexander Dalloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alain Reguera Delgado schrieb:
>
> Hello Alain,
>
> sorry for replying late.
>
> >>> Not too much difference from previous one:
> >>>
> >>> S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Cyrus timsieved v2.3.7-Invoca-RPM-2.3.7-1.1.el5"
> >>> S: "SIEVE" "comparator-i;
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Here is the applicable article:
http://www.linux.com/feature/125548
There are links in the above article that explain tests for the system
and what is currently known about the rootkit.
Apparently initial access is NOT via any vulnerability but just guessed
root passwor
Here is the applicable article:
http://www.linux.com/feature/125548
There are links in the above article that explain tests for the system
and what is currently known about the rootkit.
Apparently initial access is NOT via any vulnerability but just guessed
root passwords.
There are curren
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:57:44 -0600
Robert Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil
and scribbled:
> The shell does not apply aliases to commands executed from
> scripts.
I knew that...after testing it an hour ago. In the corner of my
mind somewhere I knew that as I have scripted in a limi
> do you mean making apache use a specific IP when it proxies the request?
> (you really lost me, so I may be misunderstanding). why do need that at
> all? whatever IP is used should not matter since the backend will reply
> over the socket that was opened by the proxy (be it a production proxy
> o
On Jan 28, 2008 8:45 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> OK let me explain like this...
>
> We had a problem with our General network administration and our General
> network cant be managed so well(Cause of our IT manager is not so good about
> administration on our netwo
Alex White wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:25:27 -0500
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil
and scribbled:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ alias foo=bar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ foo
bash: bar: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ "foo"
bash: foo: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTE
--- Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 1/28/2008 3:18 AM Balaji spake the following:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I need CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step
> Text Mode Installation
> > Screen Shots.
> >
> > Please send me the following Installation Screen
> Shots Details or link
> >
Dan Halbert wrote:
I have a fairly vanilla install of Centos5 on a desktop box (with a
Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5752 Gigabit NIC). When booting, the boot
process hangs at "Applying ip6tables firewall rules" for 30-60 seconds
before proceeding, which is annoying. I have not tried to turn off
ipv6
Dan Halbert wrote:
> I have a fairly vanilla install of Centos5 on a desktop box (with a
> Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5752 Gigabit NIC). When booting, the boot process
> hangs at "Applying ip6tables firewall rules" for 30-60 seconds before
> proceeding, which is annoying. I have not tried to turn off ip
I have a fairly vanilla install of Centos5 on a desktop box (with a
Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5752 Gigabit NIC). When booting, the boot process
hangs at "Applying ip6tables firewall rules" for 30-60 seconds before
proceeding, which is annoying. I have not tried to turn off ipv6
networking. I guess
Sloppy cut-n-paste error using -o, so this is obviously wrong ...
> day=`date +%d`
>
> if [ $day -ge 8 -o $day -le 14 ]; then
>
> echo '2nd Friday'
>
># do F2
>
> elif [ $day -ge 15 -o $day -le 21 ]; then
>
> echo '3rd Friday'
>
># do F3
> fi
>
maybe something more like this:
da
Alex White wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:12:41 -0800 (PST)
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled:
Curious question that is directly related to this. This did work
on my system; however, I'm not sure if this is something one wants
to be doing. If one were to type literally
On Jan 28, 2008 2:26 PM, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible for me to schedule cron to say run script A on the first
> Friday of the month, script B on the second Friday of the month, script C,
> etc.?
>
I think you can make cronjob run on every Friday, and in your script
On Jan 28, 2008 1:26 PM, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible for me to schedule cron to say run script A on the first
> Friday of the month, script B on the second Friday of the month, script C,
> etc.?
There is always the lowly 'at' command. Setup and maintenance would be
a
Alain Reguera Delgado schrieb:
Hello Alain,
sorry for replying late.
>>> Not too much difference from previous one:
>>>
>>> S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Cyrus timsieved v2.3.7-Invoca-RPM-2.3.7-1.1.el5"
>>> S: "SIEVE" "comparator-i;ascii-numeric fileinto reject vacation
>>> imapflags notify envelope rela
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:25:27 -0500
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil
and scribbled:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ alias foo=bar
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ foo
> bash: bar: command not found
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ "foo"
> bash: foo: command not found
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ \f
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
Is it possible for me to schedule cron to say run script A on the first
Friday of the month, script B on the second Friday of the month, script
C, etc.?
Yes. You just need to specify the "day of the week" and a "day of the
month" with a range that can only happen for the
Is it possible for me to schedule cron to say run script A on the first
Friday of the month, script B on the second Friday of the month, script C,
etc.?
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:22 -0600, Alex White wrote:
> Curious question that is directly related to this. This did work
> on my system; however, I'm not sure if this is something one wants
> to be doing. If one were to type literally:
>
> "cp" -fr somedir somefile ~/
>
> Would this defeat the al
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:12:41 -0800 (PST)
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled:
Curious question that is directly related to this. This did work
on my system; however, I'm not sure if this is something one wants
to be doing. If one were to type literally:
"cp" -fr somedir
Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I issue the command cp -af --reply=yes * ../other
> it tells me --reply is deprecated and use -i or -f.
>
> when I remove the --reply=yes I have to indicate 'y' to every
> file being copied.
>
> I just want to copy every file in my current directory to another
> directory a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008, Jerry Geis wrote:
>When I issue the command cp -af --reply=yes * ../other
>it tells me --reply is deprecated and use -i or -f.
>
>when I remove the --reply=yes I have to indicate 'y' to every
>file being copied.
>
>I just want to copy every file in my current directory to anot
Jerry Geis wrote:
When I issue the command cp -af --reply=yes * ../other
it tells me --reply is deprecated and use -i or -f.
when I remove the --reply=yes I have to indicate 'y' to every
file being copied.
I just want to copy every file in my current directory to another
directory and overwrite
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:45:15PM -0500, Jerry Geis alleged:
> When I issue the command cp -af --reply=yes * ../other
> it tells me --reply is deprecated and use -i or -f.
>
> when I remove the --reply=yes I have to indicate 'y' to every
> file being copied.
>
> I just want to copy every file in
Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I issue the command cp -af --reply=yes * ../other
> it tells me --reply is deprecated and use -i or -f.
>
> when I remove the --reply=yes I have to indicate 'y' to every
> file being copied.
>
> I just want to copy every file in my current directory to another
> directory a
When I issue the command cp -af --reply=yes * ../other
it tells me --reply is deprecated and use -i or -f.
when I remove the --reply=yes I have to indicate 'y' to every
file being copied.
I just want to copy every file in my current directory to another
directory and overwrite any file that is t
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:07:38AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> Last I heard, he was being investigated for a possible "lifetime
>> commitment".
>> But that was a while ago.
>
> for the blow by blow trial notes, see
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/localnews/category?b
Scott Silva wrote:
Last I heard, he was being investigated for a possible "lifetime
commitment".
But that was a while ago.
for the blow by blow trial notes, see
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/localnews/category?blogid=37&cat=1428
annoying, its newest on top, so you have to read from t
On Jan 28, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
It's safe to not load EDAC at all, but also safe to leave it loaded
and ignore
the error (I'd actually call it a warning). If the functionality is
very
important to your then you might want to do as EDAC suggests and
investigate
BIOS upgr
on 1/28/2008 8:54 AM Chris Mauritz spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
On the flipside, perhaps if you call Hans and agree to cover his legal
bills you can get a good lifetime support contract. :)
Cheers,
Last I heard, he was being investigated for a possible "lifetime
commitment".
But t
Scott Silva wrote:
>> On the flipside, perhaps if you call Hans and agree to cover his legal
>> bills you can get a good lifetime support contract. :)
>>
>> Cheers,
> Last I heard, he was being investigated for a possible "lifetime
> commitment".
> But that was a while ago.
Heh. Before the topi
on 1/28/2008 3:18 AM Balaji spake the following:
Dear All,
I need CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step Text Mode Installation
Screen Shots.
Please send me the following Installation Screen Shots Details or link
Regards
-S.Balaji
I need someone else to do my work for me, please have it
on 1/28/2008 6:57 AM Chris Mauritz spake the following:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
would be OK because it was the default. Unf
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
>
> We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
> would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had
> several occassions whe
that's what i missed. I misunderstood the directions. Now i know in
the hostname to put : in there. Let me reinstall vmware and try
it again.
Jonathan Berry wrote:
On Jan 26, 2008 10:46 PM, William Warren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running Centos 5 64 bit. For somer reason i cannot g
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of John Bowden
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:49 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Modem USB 3G
>
> On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:23:30 Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH /
> W
Anne Wilson wrote:
> The only obstacle now to running this box as the mail server is that I do
> read
> and send mail on it occasionally, while working on something. I need
> gpg-agent, but can't find how to get it. Is it merged into another
> package, or do I simply have to look at other reposi
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Balaji
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 6:18 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step Text Mode
>Installation Screen Shots
>
>Dear All,
>
>I need CentOS 4.4 a
Hi all,
I need to backup two xen server hosts with several lvm partitions to store xen
guests data (all guests are para-virtualized CentOS guests). My intention it is
to do a full backup of lvm2 partition where SO resides ( I don't have created
lvm2 partitions with snapshot option). Will this
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 00:03 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
> Bill
> --
> INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
> URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
>
> DOS: n.
Dear All,
I need CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step Text Mode
Installation Screen Shots.
Please send me the following Installation Screen Shots Details or link
Regards
-S.Balaji
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
On 1/24/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bent Terp wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Just a word of warning: after updating a few of our x86_64 based web
> > frontend boxes to the new kernel, we began to get weird MySQL
> > timeouts. The problem went away again when we downgraded to the
> >
Thanks for adv...
I have another question;)
Here is a result of iptables -L command;
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
DROP
On 1/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
Aside from not being supported by the CentOS kernels in base/updates,
I would recommend against it. No major distributor seems to put
development effort into reiserfs anymore and I
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Dianne Yumul wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded to CentOS 5.1 and everything went smoothly (Thanks for the
> awesome work!). But after rebooting, I get the following error:
>
> EDAC MC: Ver: 2.0.1 Nov 30 2007
> EDAC e7xxx: error reporting device not found:vendor 8086 device
HI
Does anybody know how to build an ldap database from scratch so that it
authenticates against a pdc andyou must also be able to add manually to the
database
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> Hello,
>
> well, the subject says it all :-)
> Could drbdlinks ( http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/drbdlinks/ ) be
> added to Extras repo, alongside DRBD packages ?
>
> Thanks in advance
Hi,
I didn't see any answer/comment...
Also, what about updating Heartbeat to 2.1.3 ?
I'm having t
On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:23:30 Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH /
WQFK-894 wrote:
> have you tried "/sbin/modprobe -r usbserial" ???
>
> EFM
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mário Gamito
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 2:4
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had
several occassions where we had massive data loss with r
61 matches
Mail list logo
