Re: [CentOS] Is FUSE enabled in centos5 ?

Thanks much for the info. Yes, centosplus seems to have fuse (Somehow, I missed it earlier) [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a Linux xx 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Mon Jul 16 08:49:50 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] modprobe fuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] lsmod | grep fuse fuse

[CentOS] centos5: NFS panic during unmount

Hello, Just noticed a NFS panic on centos5 (no updates applied yet). I don't have the serial console attached yet to get the exact stack. However, here is the stack: shrink_dcache_for_umount generic_shutdown_super kill_anon_super nfs_kill_super

Re: [CentOS] Centos and DS300

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 08:45 -0700, mario salcedo wrote: > Hi, I have a server linux whith a system storage > DS300. The server run ok, transfer file no problem. > My problem is than when i restart the DS300 this begin > to syncronizing again, but the data not is lost. I can > work whith the DS300

[CentOS] A Thank you to the Developers for the Free Software

I was feeling a bit un-appreciated as a Developer and I thought of all the other developers of Open Source (Free) Software who relentlessly contribute to/make Open Source (free) software. I just wanted to take some time to officially say *Thank You* for all the good things which you guys/gals have

[CentOS] asus p5b-vm 4gb ram ok (was 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb)

Hi, > The board has to support it. It has to be able to map the underlying memory to > a higher address space, and the bios has to notify the OS where this is. Are > you using a desktop board as opposed to a server board? Anyone trying for 3>gb ram on an Asus p5b-vm should try their new bios 901

Re: [CentOS] DVD Drive Recommendations

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 08:48 +0200, Alvin Chang wrote: > On 26/07/07, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > not many support dvd-ram, however, which was buried in his list. > > > > otherwise, I'd say any $34.95 LiteOn or LG drive could do all the rest > > of that without a hitch, SATA or PATA

[CentOS] Re: Major problem with software raid

ajulvestad spake the following on 7/26/2007 8:32 PM: > Steven Haigh writes: > >> Quoting ajulvestad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Johnny Hughes writes: ajulvestad wrote: > Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software > raid, both with three disks. > Setup: > md0

[CentOS] Re: Major problem with software raid

Steven Haigh writes: Quoting ajulvestad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Johnny Hughes writes: ajulvestad wrote: Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 *snip* Thank you for the URL,

Re: [CentOS] Re: Major problem with software raid

Quoting ajulvestad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Johnny Hughes writes: ajulvestad wrote: Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 *snip* Thank you for the URL, but I have already seen

[CentOS] Re: Major problem with software raid

Johnny Hughes writes: ajulvestad wrote: Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot where it attempted to

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Martin Marques wrote: Nick wrote: Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 29008 2382

Re: [CentOS] Major problem with software raid

ajulvestad wrote: > Ok, this is the case: > > I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. > Setup: > md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 > md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 > Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a > reboot where it attempted to fix the ra

Re: [CentOS] Is FUSE enabled in centos5 ?

On 7/26/07, Narasimha Valiveti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I noticed FUSE is not there by default disabled on centos 5. Is there a separate RPM that includes FUSE module for the same kernel as of centos 5 ?. I have installed the latest centos 5 update, don't see FUSE enabled . [EMAIL P

[CentOS] Is FUSE enabled in centos5 ?

Hello, I noticed FUSE is not there by default disabled on centos 5. Is there a separate RPM that includes FUSE module for the same kernel as of centos 5 ?. I have installed the latest centos 5 update, don't see FUSE enabled . [EMAIL PROTECTED] pwd /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.8.el5/source [EMAIL PRO

[CentOS] Major problem with software raid

Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot where it attempted to fix the raid, but it didn't exactly w

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > etc. Is there a HO

Re: [CentOS] Centos and DS300

mario salcedo wrote: Hi, I have a server linux whith a system storage DS300. The server run ok, transfer file no problem. My problem is than when i restart the DS300 this begin to syncronizing again, but the data not is lost. I can work whith the DS300 while this is syncronizing. Is this normal

Re: [CentOS] source rpms for fedora

On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: but the question was if it was possible to get them with yum. Personally, I never download SRPMS with yum. On a somewhat related issue, is the 'centos SRPM repo' supposed to work? The suff in this bug report: http://bugs.centos.org/view.p

Re: [CentOS] source rpms for fedora

John R Pierce wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Dave wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>>I'm running centos5. There's some rpms that exist on fedora that are >>> not in centos5 in it's repos. I was wondering if it was possible to set >>> up yum to get only selected packages in source rpm form ou of a fedo

[CentOS] Re: KStars on CentOS 4.4?

Lanny Marcus spake the following on 7/26/2007 3:13 PM: > Is there an RPM for this? I think it's in the kdeedu package on the FC6 > DVD. My wife is an amateur astronomer and she uses this excellent > program. If upstream isn't including it, can I get it and not break my > CentOS 4.4 system? (Also, I

[CentOS] Re: 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Martin Marques spake the following on 7/26/2007 1:46 PM: > Tim Verhoeven wrote: >> >> Another option is that you try to boot with the PAE kernel. That >> kernel is made to go over the 4GB boundary on 32bit. > > Didn't work for me. :-( > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free > total used

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Martin Marques wrote: John R Pierce wrote: but thats neither here nor there, PAE is a universal issue for any x86 32bit system with 4GB+ ram, with PAE disabled, the BIOS, PCI, AGP or PCI-express, etc IO spaces consume anywheres from .5 to 1GB of the 32bit address space. PAE is a hardware wor

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Martin Marques wrote: John R Pierce wrote: but thats neither here nor there, PAE is a universal issue for any x86 32bit system with 4GB+ ram, with PAE disabled, the BIOS, PCI, AGP or PCI-express, etc IO spaces consume anywheres from .5 to 1GB of the 32bit address space. PAE is a hardware w

[CentOS] KStars on CentOS 4.4?

Is there an RPM for this? I think it's in the kdeedu package on the FC6 DVD. My wife is an amateur astronomer and she uses this excellent program. If upstream isn't including it, can I get it and not break my CentOS 4.4 system? (Also, I'd like to migrate her and my daughter to CentOS). TIA, Lanny

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

John R Pierce wrote: but thats neither here nor there, PAE is a universal issue for any x86 32bit system with 4GB+ ram, with PAE disabled, the BIOS, PCI, AGP or PCI-express, etc IO spaces consume anywheres from .5 to 1GB of the 32bit address space. PAE is a hardware workaround implemented i

Re: [CentOS] source rpms for fedora

Johnny Hughes wrote: Dave wrote: Hello, I'm running centos5. There's some rpms that exist on fedora that are not in centos5 in it's repos. I was wondering if it was possible to set up yum to get only selected packages in source rpm form ou of a fedora repo and install them on centos? In th

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Martin Marques wrote: Nick wrote: Martin Marques wrote: The thing is, and I'm still trying to find a solution for one of our servers, the the memory addresses from 4Gb down are used for PCI, VGA, onboard stuff, and even though the memory isn't used, the addresses are, and so they are not pa

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:52 AM -0700 Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base etc. Is there a HOWTO for this (setting up a personal repo) in the wiki? I h

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

--On Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:59 PM -0600 drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ... That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them. I smell an old-time BASIC programmer. ;)

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Nick wrote: Martin Marques wrote: The thing is, and I'm still trying to find a solution for one of our servers, the the memory addresses from 4Gb down are used for PCI, VGA, onboard stuff, and even though the memory isn't used, the addresses are, and so they are not passed to the OS. Can y

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Tim Verhoeven wrote: Another option is that you try to boot with the PAE kernel. That kernel is made to go over the 4GB boundary on 32bit. Didn't work for me. :-( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 32372361865956

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Live USB

Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >>> Mark Rose wrote: I took a stab at making a bootable CentOS 5 Live USB pendrive and I ended up with a kernel panic. I was able to do this with a live CD of CentOS 4, but it seems the same procedure does

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > > > Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the > same thing. > > > > Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus" > > repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates". > > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] source rpms for fedora

Dave wrote: > Hello, >I'm running centos5. There's some rpms that exist on fedora that are > not in centos5 in it's repos. I was wondering if it was possible to set > up yum to get only selected packages in source rpm form ou of a fedora > repo and install them on centos? In that way they could

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

> Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same thing. > > Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus" > repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates". > > > That could be a problem. Thanks. Well ... actually, having plus low

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well ... actually, having plus lower is a good thing. BUT, it requires you to exclude the packages that exist in Base/Updates if you use the Plus repo. Sounds like a choice between "some of plus" versus "all of plus", correct? -- Dave K U

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

epel exists, but not ready for prime time? I'm assuming that > when it is ready it will go here. EPEL isn't a CentOS repo ... as all the other ones you have listed above are. It is your box though, so you can put it where you want. I would have it in the other 3rd party repos section t

[CentOS] source rpms for fedora

Hello, I'm running centos5. There's some rpms that exist on fedora that are not in centos5 in it's repos. I was wondering if it was possible to set up yum to get only selected packages in source rpm form ou of a fedora repo and install them on centos? In that way they could be recompiled for

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > > > On 7/26/07, *Dave K* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > > highest priority.

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, > and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing > things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not > exist, some exist but are empty, etc. > > Depending on whether I am in

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Dave K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > etc. I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I a

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not exist, some exist but are empty, etc. Depending on whether I am in production, test, or developme

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ... That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them. On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's how I set up my repository priorities,

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base etc. I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I actually made mine all multiples of 10 on the first s

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not exist, some exist but are empty, etc. If yo

[CentOS] Firefox freezes for a few seconds, since update to v.1.5.0.12

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070719 CentOS/1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos Firefox/1.5.0.12 I updated Firefox a few days ago. Now, very frequently, it freezes, for a few seconds, each time. Is this a known bug? Does it have a simple cure? TIA, Lanny _

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We should probably wait until they announce that the EPEL repo is released and correct all the missing dependencies first. Yes, now if only they marked their packages in some identifiable way that could be easily seen. /time to stir the

Re: [CentOS] Centos as a desktop, advisable?

Chris wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:27:10 +0200 > Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Dave K wrote: >>> On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would prevent it from being a

Re: [CentOS] rpms for 32 bit

Tony Barratt wrote: > Hello! > > Need to install the required rpmz to support 32bit apps on 64bit Centos 4. > How to find out which rpmz are needed? Probably the easiest way is to first make sure you have a .rpmmacros file (in at least root's home directory, also any users that you routinely use

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

drew einhorn wrote: > Information about the epel repository should be added > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL > > But since it is an immutable page someone with more privileges > than I will have to do it. We should probably wait until they announce that the EPEL repo is released and co

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

Information about the epel repository should be added http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL But since it is an immutable page someone with more privileges than I will have to do it. On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is

[CentOS] Centos and DS300

Hi, I have a server linux whith a system storage DS300. The server run ok, transfer file no problem. My problem is than when i restart the DS300 this begin to syncronizing again, but the data not is lost. I can work whith the DS300 while this is syncronizing. Is this normal?. Thanks ___

[CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast spake the following on 7/26/2007 2:39 AM: > On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote: >>> CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and >>> possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications >>> current. >> >> I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO

Re: [CentOS] File Size

On 7/26/07, Centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: any idea why my server crashes when I am creating a 200 G tar file? I am using tar -zcvf and the original file is about 250 G Probably because you're attempting to compress it at the same time. That's amazingly resource intensive, and it's probably

RE: [CentOS] CentOS based router dropping connections

Is it dropping packets or Ethernet frames? Iptables may be dropping packets, check cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -w see how many connections iptables is keeping track of. The default value held by this entry varies heavily depending on how much memory you have. On 128 MB of RAM you will get

RE: [CentOS] Yum missing dependency

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > Bowie Bailey wrote: > >>> Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts >= 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by > >>> package httpd > >> > >> Show us the output of "yum -d 5 update", please. > > [...] > > > Dep Number: 1/1 > > httpd

Re: [CentOS] CentOS based router dropping connections

On 7/24/07, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jesse Cantara wrote: > So basically, what I can figure from all of the evidence at this point > is the problem is either: > default configuration of the network in CentOS isn't proper for what > I'm doing (can't handle the traffic or number of

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

On 7/26/07, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yum install kernel-PAE [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a Linux ubercore1 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5PAE #1 SMP Tue Jul 10 07:50:36 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cach

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Tim Verhoeven wrote: On 7/26/07, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 33695442549668 819876

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote: If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has real experiences on upgrading OS? You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if y

RE: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of beast > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:25 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable? > > On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote: > >>If I choose this path, ca

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Martin Marques wrote: Nick wrote: Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 29008 2382

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Hi Nick, - "Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's > shows up as: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free > total used free sharedbuffers > cached > Mem: 33695442549668 819876

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

On 7/26/07, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 290082

Re: [CentOS] File Size

any idea why my server crashes when I am creating a 200 G tar file? I am using tar -zcvf and the original file is about 250 G Centos wrote: ok, the file system is ext and block size is the default which is 4096, so I should be able to have 16 Tera Byte filesystem and 2 Tera Byte files size.

Re: [CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Nick wrote: Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 290082382360 -/+ buffers/cache:

[CentOS] 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb

Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 290082382360 -/+ buffers/cache: 138300

[CentOS] Re: slow SMTP-AUTH

Ray Van Dolson wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:35:58PM -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Brett Schroeder wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Hi, I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH and when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big dela

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing that Priorities is the recommen

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, beast wrote: > On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote: > > >If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local > > >repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has > > >real experiences on upgrading OS? > > > >You really want apt

Re: [CentOS] Re: Cricket

centos a écrit : Thank you Ugo, But I was asking about Cricket and not Cacti. please let me know if you have installed Cricket as well. Just here : http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/cricket/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.c

[CentOS] Re: Cricket

centos wrote: Thank you Ugo, But I was asking about Cricket and not Cacti. You're right I confused them... please let me know if you have installed Cricket as well. No, I can't even remember what it does. Ugo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

[CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing that Priorities is the recommended plugin, so I will change to that, from ProtectBase

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] Problems printing multi-page emails to SMB printer HP1120C

On 7/26/07, Andrew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a SMB printer on my network (HP1120C connected to a Windows XP machine). CUPS test page printed OK (CUPS v1.1.x) so printer appears to be installed and set up correctly for printing from my CentOS 5 machine. Problem is when I try to print

[CentOS] Problems printing multi-page emails to SMB printer HP1120C

I have a SMB printer on my network (HP1120C connected to a Windows XP machine). CUPS test page printed OK (CUPS v1.1.x) so printer appears to be installed and set up correctly for printing from my CentOS 5 machine. Problem is when I try to print multi-page emails, I get an unspecified error after p

[CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote: If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has real experiences on upgrading OS? You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if you want to go t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Live USB

Dag Wieers wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: Mark Rose wrote: I took a stab at making a bootable CentOS 5 Live USB pendrive and I ended up with a kernel panic. I was able to do this with a live CD of CentOS 4, but it seems the same procedure does not

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote: CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications current. I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is 3.1.1, today OO in Centos5 is 2.0.4,

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: > It seems not. Updates directory in Centos 3 still contains OOv1.1.2 only. > So, what is the meaning of "supported for 5 years"? is it only for bug and > security fixes, not features or enhancements? Correct. And it is 7 years. Also there are some slight feature enhancements during t

Re: [CentOS] DVD Drive Recommendations

John R Pierce wrote: I've used an Optiarc to burn all that in Linux, some with cdrecord some with NeroLinux. Optiarc is a joint NEC/Sony company. DVD drives/burners are commodity these days with standard interfaces. not many support dvd-ram, however, which was buried in his list. But the Opt

[CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote: CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications current. I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is 3.1.1, today OO in Centos5 is 2.0.4, will it get u

Re: [CentOS] Yum missing dependency

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Bowie Bailey wrote: >>> Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts >= 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by >>> package httpd >> >> Show us the output of "yum -d 5 update", please. [...] > Dep Number: 1/1 > httpd requires: initscripts >= 7.93.26.EL-1 > --> Proces

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Live USB

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > > Mark Rose wrote: > >> I took a stab at making a bootable CentOS 5 Live USB pendrive and I > >> ended up with a kernel panic. I was able to do this with a live CD of > >> CentOS 4, but it seems the same procedure does not wo

Re: [CentOS] SHOULD I NEED TO RECOMPILE THE KERNEL ?

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 06:25 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:36 +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > > I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite > > slow. It has only 128 MB RAM. So I upgraded it to 512 MB RAM. Now, It > > is running with 512

Re: [CentOS] migrating users from linux to centos

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:46 -0400, Barry L. Kline wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > simon wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I have been running linux 9 server as a dns and mail server and is workin > > fine.. > > > > i want to install CENTOS 5 with all the latest mail serve

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: On 25/07/07 10:38 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: They are kept functional and secure. I think that is enough in many cases. If someone really needs a special app they can always compile it and/or install it in their $HOME. Are you saying that you predict users will not need an

Re: [CentOS] DVD Drive Recommendations

Forgot to mention - the server will be FJ Primergy RX200_S3 and RX300_S3. what does the vendor supply? those are 1U rack servers (appears the RX200-S3 is, I can't seem to find any pix of the RX300)? they probably have a slimline internal dvd that can be optionally DVD +/- RW etc.

Re: [CentOS] DVD Drive Recommendations

Morten Torstensen wrote: Camron W. Fox wrote: DVD hyper multidrive, capable of reading and writing DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, DVD-R for DL, and DVD+R DL. I've used an Optiarc to burn all that in Linux, some with cdrecord some with NeroLinux. Optiarc is a joint NEC/Sony company. DV