On 7/26/07, Dave K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the > highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base > etc. I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I actually made mine all multiples of 10 on the first setup to make tuning easier.
Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same thing. Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus"
repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates".
That could be a problem. Thanks. --
Dave K Unix Systems & Network Administrator Mount Laurel NJ _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- Drew Einhorn
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
