Dear All,
Has anyone here tried using/compiling wxWinCE with cegcc?
I'm currently developing an app for which the GUI complexity is really
quite small, using MFC for the GUI part, and using a DLL compiled using
cegcc for most of the functionality.
It seems to me that if I could replace MFC wit
Dear All,
I've recently fixed some C++ code so that it will compile with the
mingw32ce flavour of cegcc (I've been using the "normal" cegcc with
newlib before now). I was hoping to remove the dependency on the cegcc
DLLs, and also speed up file opening (the app opens lots and lots of files).
H
Thanks for the responses. I guess that confirms that my problem is down
to the memory allocation.
Pedro Alves wrote:
> You could try reusing it, and/or writing your own
> global operator new, operator delete, etc.
This sounds like a good idea - I think that I'll try that. I guess I can
extract t
Quite a while ago when I first started using cegcc I ran into a problem
when using cegcc-compiled DLLs with microsoft-compiled executables:
> > My workaround was to add a call to _initstdio() in a special init
> > function in my DLL that I call before I make any other calls to the
> DLL.
> > Now
InfoMail InfoMail wrote:
> Why import libraries created using mingw32ce aren't compatible with
> ones produced by VC? dll created using mingw32ce is working fine (on
> my Dell WinCE 5.0 device) only if i use an import library created
> using VC.
>
> Any idea to solve this issue?
>
> PS: i'm obli
Do you really need to call WSAStartup when you are using cegcc (of the
non-mingw variety)?
Wouldn't the POSIX compatibility provided by newlib do this for you?
I ask with interest as I also want to do some networking stuff soon. I
was assuming that if I used cegcc-mingw then I would need WSASta
eemed
to work ok.
That is until the WiFi driver on my iPAQ decides to throw a wobbily,
unloads the driver, only to be restored by a system reset! (anyone know
about the reliability of WiFi on a HP iPAQ 27xx?). Works fine over the
USB, though.
Hywel.
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17
Danny Backx wrote:
> So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use
> mingw32ce instead of cegcc ?
>
>
I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the
memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical to
this application).
See thi
Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the
>> memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical
>> to this application).
>
&g
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 31 August 2008 11:32:47, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
>
>> I can compile with the mingw32ce version, but it just runs too slow, and
>> I have not as yet managed to fix this by using the allocator directly or
>> by using special allocators.
&
Hi,
Is anyone out there compiling for WinCE/SH4?
Is it possible to coax cegcc to build for this platform, or does there
exist another gcc-based cross-compiling toolchain somewhere?
Failing that, does anyone know how I might go about building for this
platform using gcc?
Many thanks in advance
Vincent R. wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:17:12 +, "Hywel B. Richards"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone out there compiling for WinCE/SH4?
>>
>> Is it possible to coax cegcc to build for this platform, or does there
>> exis
Thanks for the replies.
I think I might need a bit more help with this one!
I downloaded cegcc and the nearest version I could find of binutils
(Sticky Date: 2008.01.06.00.00.00) and version 4.1.0 of gcc, to do diffs
to analyse the changes as suggested by Vincent.
I started out by compiling ceg
mike johnson wrote:
> ...
> Then I got another error about:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/cegcc/newlib/etc'
> /opt/t/src/newlib/missing makeinfo --split-size=500
> --split-size=500 --no-split -I/opt/t/src/newlib/etc -o
> standards.info /opt/t/src/newlib/etc/standards.texi
> WARNIN
Marc Vaillant wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Lars Munch wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing! Out of curiosity, have you tried to build libcurl
>> with arm-mingw32ce ?
>>
>
> No luck b/c of an errno.h requirement. I did not pursue workarounds
> because I think that there a
Danny Backx wrote:
> Does anyone have a simple scenario that demonstrates how applications
> built with cegcc fail to run on WM 6.1 ?
>
> Will that turn up on the WM 6.1.4 emulators from the Microsoft site
> too ?
>
It was quite a while ago that I did this, but I can confirm that you
could demo
Vincent R. wrote:
>
> NO and NO!
> I am talking about Windows Mobile >= 5 not Windows CE ,just for
> information
>
> Windows Mobile 5 = ARM + windows ce 5.1 + specific GUI
> Windows Mobile 6 = ARM + windows ce 5.2 + specific GUI
>
> and you know that cegcc binaries don't work on Windows Mobile .
Does anyone routinely use cegcc to compile in thumb mode?
I thought I would give it a try, but I'm having problems.
If I try:
arm-wince-cegcc-g++ -mthumb -mcpu=xscale -c trivial.c
on some trivial code it appears to work fine, but then if I try on some
real code (that works fine without the -m
18 matches
Mail list logo
