This required an additional parameter to FDCHECK.
Committed too.
Danny
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 15:52 -0700, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this attached fix should take care of providing fsync()/fdatasync()
> functionliaty. For now it's a straight call to FlushFileBuffers().
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi,
sorry, needs to be included in, or symbol doesn't get
exported. Here is the updated diff.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Pawel Veselov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this attached fix should take care of providing fsync()/fdatasync()
> functionliaty. For now it's a straight call to
Hi,
this attached fix should take care of providing fsync()/fdatasync()
functionliaty. For now it's a straight call to FlushFileBuffers().
Thanks,
Pawel.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ skipped ]
> If you have corrections/submissions of this kind, p
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:54 -0700, Pawel Veselov wrote:
[ skipped ]
>> For the cegcc functionality, it seems that the header files define
>> way more functions than are implemented in the libraries.
>> There are no bugs or
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:54 -0700, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> this may be a stupid question, really, but I couldn't find anything
> about this online...
Not a stupid question at all.
> For the cegcc functionality, it seems that the header files define
> way more functions than are implemented in the
