On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:54 -0700, Pawel Veselov wrote:
[ skipped ] >> For the cegcc functionality, it seems that the header files define >> way more functions than are implemented in the libraries. >> There are no bugs or feature requests submitted for missing functions. >> Is there an ongoing effort to add all the functionality, or trim the header >> files? > > The header files are, in large part, inherited from other projects such > as mingw and newlib. From their heritage, the include files bring > definitions of functions that exist in other versions of Windows. > > When pointed to such issues, we correct our headers. Well, recently I stumbled upon: - syslog functions (defined, not implemented) - fcntl (defined, implemented, don't do nothing but return ENOSYS) - fsync (defined, not implemented) > There's been such as message on the list a couple of days ago. I should > have treated it already but didn't have the time yet. Will do shortly. > > If you have corrections/submissions of this kind, please send in a > patch ! Pending I can finally completely build cegcc (failing at gdb now), I'll provide the patch for implementing fsync(), as there is an analogue in WinCE APIs :) [ skipped ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
