I've committed it, as you indicated. That saves you the trouble. Again,
thanks for the work.
Danny
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:08 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Here is the patch that moves _M_ARM and ARM back into gcc builtins,
> and
> adds _M_ARMT.
> _M_ARM and _M_ARMT will be defined to the
I haven't exactly done stress testing on it but it works for me, thanks.
I've been chasing a bug or two of my own, seem to have found one just
now.
Danny
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:08 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx escreveu:
> > Pedro,
> >
> > The commit described below moves the
Pedro Alves escreveu:
>
> I've tested it manually using -march=armv4, -march=armv5, etc, and
> with -mcpu=arm8, -mcpu=xscale, etc.
I meant like this:
$touch test.c
$arm-wince-mingw32ce-gcc -mcpu=xscale -dD -E test.c | grep ARM
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
-
Danny Backx escreveu:
Pedro,
The commit described below moves the _M_ARM definitions from gcc
internals into an include file.
For the _M_ARM, this is clearly something that needed to be done : its
value depends on it, you cannot do this easily in the gcc internals.
I am wondering why we would
