I've committed it, as you indicated. That saves you the trouble. Again, thanks for the work.
Danny
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:08 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Here is the patch that moves _M_ARM and ARM back into gcc builtins,
> and
> adds _M_ARMT.
> _M_ARM and _M_ARMT will be defined to the arm arch being compiled to,
> _M_ARMT will only be defined
> if the arm arch supports thumb, and ARM will be defined as empty. I
> think this matches MSFT's tools behavior.
>
> I've tested it manually using -march=armv4, -march=armv5, etc, and
> with
> -mcpu=arm8, -mcpu=xscale, etc.
> I will commit it later if you confirm it works for you, or you can
> commit it yourself if you want.
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
