On Wednesday 30 December 2009 20:08:53, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > (btw, I've got that zlib errno/GetLastError patch almost ready)
>
> great ! I hope that this patch will be in soon :-)
Patch posted at zlib-devel@, which includes tweaks for
being able t
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 19:38:29, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 29 December 2009 06:33:30, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>
about the linking, should I pass -Wl,--major-subsystem-version,4 and
>>>
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 19:38:29, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 29 December 2009 06:33:30, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >
> >> about the linking, should I pass -Wl,--major-subsystem-version,4 and
> >> -Wl,--minor-subsystem-version,20 ?
> >
> > I
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 December 2009 06:33:30, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> about the linking, should I pass -Wl,--major-subsystem-version,4 and
>> -Wl,--minor-subsystem-version,20 ?
>
> I can't remember if this has any effect on dlls (IIRC, application
> user inter
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 06:33:30, Vincent Torri wrote:
> about the linking, should I pass -Wl,--major-subsystem-version,4 and
> -Wl,--minor-subsystem-version,20 ?
I can't remember if this has any effect on dlls (IIRC, application
user interface look different [menubar, etc.] if you specify a
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 08:34:12, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 18:00 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > I also see that you set -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 in the Makefile. I wish
> > > people would stop doing that. _WIN32_IE is not meant for CE
On Monday 28 December 2009 17:00:11, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> >> btw, feel free to mention any improvements about the port (see the README
> >> file, about the optimization flags, for example)
> >
> >> From said README:
> >
> >> 7) Compilation
> >>
> >>
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 18:00 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > I also see that you set -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 in the Makefile. I wish
> > people would stop doing that. _WIN32_IE is not meant for CE
> > usage. If you do need it, it's a bug in the w32api headers
hey
about the linking, should I pass -Wl,--major-subsystem-version,4 and
-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version,20 ?
Vincent Torri
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon'
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> btw, feel free to mention any improvements about the port (see the README
>> file, about the optimization flags, for example)
>
>> From said README:
>
>> 7) Compilation
>>
>> * Version: svn 22-Jul-2008
>> * Architecture: mingw32ce
>> * CPPFLAGS: -D_W
On Monday 28 December 2009 12:32:01, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> > On Monday 28 December 2009 10:35:40, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey,
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> >> The maitainer of zlib wants to release a new version. I plan to integrate
> >> the patches (
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2009 10:35:40, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>
> Hello!
>
>> The maitainer of zlib wants to release a new version. I plan to integrate
>> the patches (a bit modified, though) for the compilation with mingw32ce
>> (cegcc version is
On Monday 28 December 2009 10:35:40, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> Hey,
Hello!
> The maitainer of zlib wants to release a new version. I plan to integrate
> the patches (a bit modified, though) for the compilation with mingw32ce
> (cegcc version is not needed).
(I don't know much about upstream zl
Hey,
The maitainer of zlib wants to release a new version. I plan to integrate
the patches (a bit modified, though) for the compilation with mingw32ce
(cegcc version is not needed).
the last version (maybe without my patches, i didn't look at it)
http://zlib.net/current/beta/zlib-1.2.3.4.tar.
14 matches
Mail list logo