On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 19:38:29, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday 29 December 2009 06:33:30, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> >>>> about the linking, should I pass -Wl,--major-subsystem-version,4 and >>>> -Wl,--minor-subsystem-version,20 ? >>> >>> I can't remember if this has any effect on dlls (IIRC, application >>> user interface look different [menubar, etc.] if you specify an >>> old subsystem version), but, any reason to limit this 4.2, instead >>> of sticking to the default of 3.0? >> >> no real reason. We are in 2009, win ce 3.0 was released in 1999, 4.2.0 in >> 2003. I don't think that there is a lot of embedded devices using win ce 3 >> only. > > If there's no reason, I'd say leave in the defaults. You never know > what's out there. zlib builds fine with _WIN32_WCE set to 0x300, and so > does src/mingw, and so do all the dlls we ship. ok. > (btw, I've got that zlib errno/GetLastError patch almost ready) great ! I hope that this patch will be in soon :-) Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
