Thanks,
I have the impression that I have seen it somewhere else as well, but
I might be wrong.
fair enough your feedback, thanks
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 23:38 +0200, mobi phil wrote:
>> UNDER_CE has low value. If I understand well I think it
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 23:38 +0200, mobi phil wrote:
> UNDER_CE has low value. If I understand well I think it should
> normally contain the version of windows ce if compiled with MS tools.
> There is lot of source code out there with features that are only in >
> 6.0.
>
> I was reading somewhere t
UNDER_CE has low value. If I understand well I think it should
normally contain the version of windows ce if compiled with MS tools.
There is lot of source code out there with features that are only in >
6.0.
I was reading somewhere that you are discouraging to link against
"modern" features like
