Danny Backx wrote:
> I don't have the DLL mentioned on that MSDN page on my PDA. (That makes
> sense, the page says it only applies to Windows Embedded CE which I
> don't think I have.)
>
> The functions are all in our coredll.def, but without the ordinal. Would
> that be the problem ?
No, as th
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 00:33 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I doubt it. There shouldn't be any difference in calling system functions.
> It's just a bl anyway.
>
> Your example is about floating point arithmetic. Is Xwords doing it a lot?
>
> Pgeorges, is you chess engine doing a lot of fp math?
>
Pedro Alves a écrit :
> Danny Backx escreveu:
>> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
Crosswords, compiled with cegcc, runs noticably slower than compiled
with the m$ compiler. Eric House also reported this. I've not
investigated this yet. We may have inefficiencies oth
Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
>>> Crosswords, compiled with cegcc, runs noticably slower than compiled
>>> with the m$ compiler. Eric House also reported this. I've not
>>> investigated this yet. We may have inefficiencies other than the code
>>> generat
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
> > Crosswords, compiled with cegcc, runs noticably slower than compiled
> > with the m$ compiler. Eric House also reported this. I've not
> > investigated this yet. We may have inefficiencies other than the code
> > generated by the compiler. Some
Danny Backx a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
>
I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsof
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
> >> I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
> >> number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
> >> ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsoft
> >> compilers.
> Playing
Pedro Alves a écrit :
> pgeorges wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
>> number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
>> ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsoft
>> compilers.
>> Years ago I made
pgeorges wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
> number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
> ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsoft compilers.
> Years ago I made some comparisons between gcc and
Hi,
I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsoft compilers.
Years ago I made some comparisons between gcc and icc under Linux and
notice
10 matches
Mail list logo
