Hi,
> >> Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
> >
> >> Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc
> > version
> >> (gcc-4.4.3) ?
> >
> > Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that.
>
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:09:40 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:37 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote:
>> Danny,
>>
>> Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
>
>> Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the late
> >
> > What about the other problem (that I'm getting unaligned access on
> load)?
> > I have src code that builds and works just fine with 4.1 build cegcc
> svn.1279. The only problem with that build is that the dll has
> something corrupt in the PE header and I fix it by upx-compressing it.
> B
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 14:24 -0500, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> > > Danny,
> > >
> > > Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
> >
> > > Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc
> > version
> > > (gcc-4.4.3) ?
> >
>
> > Danny,
> >
> > Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
>
> > Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc
> version
> > (gcc-4.4.3) ?
>
> Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that.
> 4
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:37 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote:
> Danny,
>
> Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
> Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc
version
> (gcc-4.4.3) ?
Maybe not difficult, but I am not s
Danny,
Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ?
Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc version
(gcc-4.4.3) ?
--
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Pre
> > I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat
> me
> > to it :-)
> >
> Why are you using specific gnu attribute instead of declspec ?
> Wben using declspec, does it crash ?
>
That was preprocessed source. Original file had _declspec(dllimport/export)
-
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 21:01 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:39:01 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
> > I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached.
> >
> > When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below.
> >
> > I'll try to work further
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:39:01 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached.
>
> When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below.
>
> I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me
> to it :-)
>
Why are yo
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 20:39 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached.
>
> When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below.
>
> I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me
> to it :-)
I reported thi
I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached.
When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below.
I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me
to it :-)
When running this with -v it is clear - if the error message wasn't
already - th
> > > I just took latest svn cegcc and wanted to test if the loading
> error
> > > was fixed (the infamous problem that is only fixed by using upx).
> >
> > Partially. It may work for you, give it a try.
> >
>
> Surprisingly, I got opposite behavior with the dll binaries compiled
> with latest ceg
> > I just took latest svn cegcc and wanted to test if the loading error
> > was fixed (the infamous problem that is only fixed by using upx).
>
> Partially. It may work for you, give it a try.
>
Surprisingly, I got opposite behavior with the dll binaries compiled with
latest cegcc: they load f
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:24 -0500, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> I just took latest svn cegcc and wanted to test if the loading error
> was fixed (the infamous problem that is only fixed by using upx).
Partially. It may work for you, give it a try.
> But I can’t even compile my code, I’m getting ICE.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
