On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:32:13PM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 09:03 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > The patch that follows was generated against
> > https://cegcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/cegcc/tags/cegcc-0.55.
> > Unfortunately, WinMo .exes produced from this tree don't work
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:44 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > > I'm not sure how to proceed with getting this fixed upstream. The
> > > whole mingw world seems behind on Linux.
> >
> > Getting a bug fixed in binutils is not hard : just send the fix to the
> > right mailing list (bug-binut...@gnu.org).
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 09:03 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > The patch that follows was generated against
> > https://cegcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/cegcc/tags/cegcc-0.55.
> > Unfortunately, WinMo .exes produced from this tree don't work for me,
>
> Why ?
I'm not sure. It won't load on the simu
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 09:03 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> The patch that follows was generated against
> https://cegcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/cegcc/tags/cegcc-0.55.
> Unfortunately, WinMo .exes produced from this tree don't work for me,
Why ?
> I'm not sure how to proceed with getting this fixe
I've figured out at least one way to get binutils to detect that iconv
is available on my system when compiling windres. In reading about
how autoconf works I found that the gcc code follows recommended
practice better than binutils does, and also noted that gcc tests for
HAVE_ICONV rather than HA
