On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:44 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > > I'm not sure how to proceed with getting this fixed upstream. The
> > > whole mingw world seems behind on Linux.
> >
> > Getting a bug fixed in binutils is not hard : just send the fix to the
> > right mailing list (bug-binut...@gnu.org). Doing the diff against their
> > CVS (instead of cegcc's SVN) would make their work easier.
>
> Do you expect to pull from binutils trunk anytime soon?
>
> Last I checked the tip of mingw didn't build on Linux, and discussions
> on their boards suggest it's not a priority for them until the gcc
> world settles down. If I can't build, can I submit a patch that I
> haven't been able to test even to see if it compiles? (I tried
> setting up cygwin to build on XP and got nowhere: I'm a Windows newbie
> and don't have time to learn that OS.)
I must be overlooking something. What's the mingw you're referring to ?
To me it looks like your patch is on binutils. If binutils-CVS works as
a part of cegcc, and you can fix an error in it, and test that, then
this should do ...
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
