Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Dave Korn
Danny Backx wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:01 +, Dave Korn wrote: >> Also, what's going on there with the VMA/LMA for .data? It can't possibly >> really be supposed to be 32 meg below the base address that the DLL gets >> loaded at! > > Considering that these are "system DLLs", I am not

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread İsmail Dönmez
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Vincent R. wrote: > On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:40:37 +0200, İsmail Dönmez > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Vincent R. > wrote: >>> >>> OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports >>> either. >>> Let me make some assumptions, are y

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread İsmail Dönmez
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Vincent R. wrote: > > OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports > either. > Let me make some assumptions, are you extracting those files from ROM with > the kind of tool > you can find on XDA website ? > IT might explain your corrupted

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Vincent R.
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:40:37 +0200, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Vincent R. wrote: >> >> OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports >> either. >> Let me make some assumptions, are you extracting those files from ROM >> with >> the kind of tool

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Vincent R.
OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports either. Let me make some assumptions, are you extracting those files from ROM with the kind of tool you can find on XDA website ? IT might explain your corrupted binaries. -

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread cartman
Vincent R. wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:58:12 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dave Korn-2 [via cegcc-devel] >> wrote: >>> İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote: Vincent R. wrote: > Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ? >

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Vincent R.
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:58:12 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dave Korn-2 [via cegcc-devel] > wrote: >> İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote: >>> Vincent R. wrote: Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ? Thanks >>> >>> Danny privat

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:01 +, Dave Korn wrote: > Also, what's going on there with the VMA/LMA for .data? It can't possibly > really be supposed to be 32 meg below the base address that the DLL gets > loaded at! Considering that these are "system DLLs", I am not sure whether what we're seei

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread cartman
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dave Korn-2 [via cegcc-devel] wrote: > İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote: >> Vincent R. wrote: >>> Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ? >>> Thanks >>> >> >> Danny privately analyzed the file and objdump is correct it seems, so >> there >> is no bug. Th

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Dave Korn
İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote: > Vincent R. wrote: >> Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ? >> Thanks >> > > Danny privately analyzed the file and objdump is correct it seems, so there > is no bug. Thanks. Well there's clearly at least a bug in objdump, since it is displaying gi

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread cartman
Vincent R. wrote: > > Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ? > Thanks > Danny privately analyzed the file and objdump is correct it seems, so there is no bug. Thanks. - Regards, İsmail DÖNMEZ -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Can-t-see-the-exports-

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-09 Thread Vincent R.
Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ? Thanks -- Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev __

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-08 Thread Dave Korn
İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote: > The Data Directory > Entry 0 49dec2e0 0006ea70 Export Directory [.edata (or where ever we found > it)] That's 100% bogus. You need to figure out whether that's what's actually in the binary data in the PE header, put there by ld for some reason, or whether objdu

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-08 Thread cartman
İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote: > > > > Danny Backx wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 05:49 -0800, İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote: >>> Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe? >> >> Sorry about that. >> >>> > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -x coredll.dll >> >>> > Please note the

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-08 Thread cartman
Danny Backx wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 05:49 -0800, İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote: >> Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe? > > Sorry about that. > >> > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -x coredll.dll > >> > Please note the message "There is an export table, but the section

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-08 Thread Danny Backx
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 05:49 -0800, İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote: > Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe? Sorry about that. > > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -x coredll.dll > > Please note the message "There is an export table, but the section > > containing it could not be found".

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-08 Thread cartman
Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe? İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote: > > Hi all; > > Seems like objdump is broken : > > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -v > GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016 > Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This program is free software;

[Cegcc-devel] Can't see the exports table

2009-12-05 Thread cartman
Hi all; Seems like objdump is broken : [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -v GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016 Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) an