Danny Backx wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:01 +, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Also, what's going on there with the VMA/LMA for .data? It can't possibly
>> really be supposed to be 32 meg below the base address that the DLL gets
>> loaded at!
>
> Considering that these are "system DLLs", I am not
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Vincent R. wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:40:37 +0200, İsmail Dönmez
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Vincent R.
> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports
>>> either.
>>> Let me make some assumptions, are y
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Vincent R. wrote:
>
> OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports
> either.
> Let me make some assumptions, are you extracting those files from ROM with
> the kind of tool
> you can find on XDA website ?
> IT might explain your corrupted
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:40:37 +0200, İsmail Dönmez
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Vincent R.
wrote:
>>
>> OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports
>> either.
>> Let me make some assumptions, are you extracting those files from ROM
>> with
>> the kind of tool
OK I had a look with PE Explorer tool and it doesn't detect any exports
either.
Let me make some assumptions, are you extracting those files from ROM with
the kind of tool
you can find on XDA website ?
IT might explain your corrupted binaries.
-
Vincent R. wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:58:12 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dave Korn-2 [via cegcc-devel]
>> wrote:
>>> İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote:
Vincent R. wrote:
> Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ?
>
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:58:12 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dave Korn-2 [via cegcc-devel]
> wrote:
>> İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote:
>>> Vincent R. wrote:
Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ?
Thanks
>>>
>>> Danny privat
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:01 +, Dave Korn wrote:
> Also, what's going on there with the VMA/LMA for .data? It can't possibly
> really be supposed to be 32 meg below the base address that the DLL gets
> loaded at!
Considering that these are "system DLLs", I am not sure whether what
we're seei
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dave Korn-2 [via cegcc-devel]
wrote:
> İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote:
>> Vincent R. wrote:
>>> Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ?
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> Danny privately analyzed the file and objdump is correct it seems, so
>> there
>> is no bug. Th
İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>> Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ?
>> Thanks
>>
>
> Danny privately analyzed the file and objdump is correct it seems, so there
> is no bug. Thanks.
Well there's clearly at least a bug in objdump, since it is displaying
gi
Vincent R. wrote:
>
> Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ?
> Thanks
>
Danny privately analyzed the file and objdump is correct it seems, so there
is no bug. Thanks.
-
Regards,
İsmail DÖNMEZ
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Can-t-see-the-exports-
Could you open a bugzilla and attach your coredll.dll ?
Thanks
--
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
__
İsmail cartman Dönmez wrote:
> The Data Directory
> Entry 0 49dec2e0 0006ea70 Export Directory [.edata (or where ever we found
> it)]
That's 100% bogus. You need to figure out whether that's what's actually in
the binary data in the PE header, put there by ld for some reason, or whether
objdu
İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote:
>
>
>
> Danny Backx wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 05:49 -0800, İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote:
>>> Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe?
>>
>> Sorry about that.
>>
>>> > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -x coredll.dll
>>
>>> > Please note the
Danny Backx wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 05:49 -0800, İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote:
>> Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe?
>
> Sorry about that.
>
>> > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -x coredll.dll
>
>> > Please note the message "There is an export table, but the section
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 05:49 -0800, İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote:
> Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe?
Sorry about that.
> > [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -x coredll.dll
> > Please note the message "There is an export table, but the section
> > containing it could not be found".
Since noone replied, am I doing something wrong maybe?
İsmail "cartman" Dönmez wrote:
>
> Hi all;
>
> Seems like objdump is broken :
>
> [~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -v
> GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
> Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software;
Hi all;
Seems like objdump is broken :
[~]> arm-mingw32ce-objdump -v
GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) an
18 matches
Mail list logo