On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 03:01 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 00:02 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:34 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >>> It's independant. The work to do this is really pretty much
> >>> mechanic, and can be done in one g
Danny Backx wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 00:02 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:34 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
It's independant. The work to do this is really pretty much
mechanic, and can be done in one go, no need to do it stepwise.
Its just a matter of going throught the var
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 00:02 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:34 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > It's independant. The work to do this is really pretty much
> > mechanic, and can be done in one go, no need to do it stepwise.
> > Its just a matter of going throught the various conf
Danny Backx wrote:
>> [*] - In that case, please remember to use the
>> correct vanilla autoconf* versions.
>
> Where do I find which the right versions are ?
>
Before regenerating:
$head configure
$head Makefile.in
-
SF
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:34 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > Pedro,
> >
> > A while ago you got the arm-unknown naming scheme accepted. We have not
> > implemented it yet though.
> >
> > What would be the best way to proceed with this ? Do you know if any of
> > the GNU tools i
Danny Backx wrote:
> Pedro,
>
> A while ago you got the arm-unknown naming scheme accepted. We have not
> implemented it yet though.
>
> What would be the best way to proceed with this ? Do you know if any of
> the GNU tools imported this into their sources ?
>
> I would guess not but your never
Pedro,
A while ago you got the arm-unknown naming scheme accepted. We have not
implemented it yet though.
What would be the best way to proceed with this ? Do you know if any of
the GNU tools imported this into their sources ?
I would guess not but your never know.
If we proceed with implementi
