Does anyone routinely use cegcc to compile in thumb mode?
I thought I would give it a try, but I'm having problems.
If I try:
arm-wince-cegcc-g++ -mthumb -mcpu=xscale -c trivial.c
on some trivial code it appears to work fine, but then if I try on some
real code (that works fine without the -m
Vincent R. wrote:
>
> NO and NO!
> I am talking about Windows Mobile >= 5 not Windows CE ,just for
> information
>
> Windows Mobile 5 = ARM + windows ce 5.1 + specific GUI
> Windows Mobile 6 = ARM + windows ce 5.2 + specific GUI
>
> and you know that cegcc binaries don't work on Windows Mobile .
Danny Backx wrote:
> Does anyone have a simple scenario that demonstrates how applications
> built with cegcc fail to run on WM 6.1 ?
>
> Will that turn up on the WM 6.1.4 emulators from the Microsoft site
> too ?
>
It was quite a while ago that I did this, but I can confirm that you
could demo
Marc Vaillant wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Lars Munch wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing! Out of curiosity, have you tried to build libcurl
>> with arm-mingw32ce ?
>>
>
> No luck b/c of an errno.h requirement. I did not pursue workarounds
> because I think that there a
mike johnson wrote:
> ...
> Then I got another error about:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/cegcc/newlib/etc'
> /opt/t/src/newlib/missing makeinfo --split-size=500
> --split-size=500 --no-split -I/opt/t/src/newlib/etc -o
> standards.info /opt/t/src/newlib/etc/standards.texi
> WARNIN
Thanks for the replies.
I think I might need a bit more help with this one!
I downloaded cegcc and the nearest version I could find of binutils
(Sticky Date: 2008.01.06.00.00.00) and version 4.1.0 of gcc, to do diffs
to analyse the changes as suggested by Vincent.
I started out by compiling ceg
Vincent R. wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:17:12 +, "Hywel B. Richards"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone out there compiling for WinCE/SH4?
>>
>> Is it possible to coax cegcc to build for this platform, or does there
>> exis
Hi,
Is anyone out there compiling for WinCE/SH4?
Is it possible to coax cegcc to build for this platform, or does there
exist another gcc-based cross-compiling toolchain somewhere?
Failing that, does anyone know how I might go about building for this
platform using gcc?
Many thanks in advance
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 31 August 2008 11:32:47, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
>
>> I can compile with the mingw32ce version, but it just runs too slow, and
>> I have not as yet managed to fix this by using the allocator directly or
>> by using special allocators.
&
Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the
>> memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical
>> to this application).
>
&g
Danny Backx wrote:
> So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use
> mingw32ce instead of cegcc ?
>
>
I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the
memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical to
this application).
See thi
eemed
to work ok.
That is until the WiFi driver on my iPAQ decides to throw a wobbily,
unloads the driver, only to be restored by a system reset! (anyone know
about the reliability of WiFi on a HP iPAQ 27xx?). Works fine over the
USB, though.
Hywel.
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17
Do you really need to call WSAStartup when you are using cegcc (of the
non-mingw variety)?
Wouldn't the POSIX compatibility provided by newlib do this for you?
I ask with interest as I also want to do some networking stuff soon. I
was assuming that if I used cegcc-mingw then I would need WSASta
InfoMail InfoMail wrote:
> Why import libraries created using mingw32ce aren't compatible with
> ones produced by VC? dll created using mingw32ce is working fine (on
> my Dell WinCE 5.0 device) only if i use an import library created
> using VC.
>
> Any idea to solve this issue?
>
> PS: i'm obli
Quite a while ago when I first started using cegcc I ran into a problem
when using cegcc-compiled DLLs with microsoft-compiled executables:
> > My workaround was to add a call to _initstdio() in a special init
> > function in my DLL that I call before I make any other calls to the
> DLL.
> > Now
Thanks for the responses. I guess that confirms that my problem is down
to the memory allocation.
Pedro Alves wrote:
> You could try reusing it, and/or writing your own
> global operator new, operator delete, etc.
This sounds like a good idea - I think that I'll try that. I guess I can
extract t
Dear All,
I've recently fixed some C++ code so that it will compile with the
mingw32ce flavour of cegcc (I've been using the "normal" cegcc with
newlib before now). I was hoping to remove the dependency on the cegcc
DLLs, and also speed up file opening (the app opens lots and lots of files).
H
Dear All,
Has anyone here tried using/compiling wxWinCE with cegcc?
I'm currently developing an app for which the GUI complexity is really
quite small, using MFC for the GUI part, and using a DLL compiled using
cegcc for most of the functionality.
It seems to me that if I could replace MFC wit
18 matches
Mail list logo
