On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:53:53 +, "Hywel B. Richards"
wrote:
> Does anyone routinely use cegcc to compile in thumb mode?
>
> I thought I would give it a try, but I'm having problems.
>
> If I try:
> arm-wince-cegcc-g++ -mthumb -mcpu=xscale -c trivial.c
>
> on some trivial code it appears to
Does anyone routinely use cegcc to compile in thumb mode?
I thought I would give it a try, but I'm having problems.
If I try:
arm-wince-cegcc-g++ -mthumb -mcpu=xscale -c trivial.c
on some trivial code it appears to work fine, but then if I try on some
real code (that works fine without the -m
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 09:41 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> I have been pointed to the MinGW policy in previous discussions. At , it
> says :
I forgot to paste the URL from which I copied the MinGW policy :
http://www.mingw.org/wiki/SubmitPatches .
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - s
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 08:47 -0800, Eric House wrote:
> > Dave Korn wrote
> > [...]
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/anthonywong/archive/2006/03/13/550686.aspx
> > [...]
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb840031.aspx
> > [...]
> > I believe that's enough publicly-available info for someone to
