On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:56 +0200, Vincent R. wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I can see for some time now that mingw/cygwin/binutils is progressing a
> lot in the PE format support/
> relocation/unicode startup but mingw32ce that belongs to cygwin/mingw
> family doesn't benefit from it.
>
> For instan
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 06:37 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> i have an implementation of pipe() using non blocking sockets, if it can
> help you
And there's something similar, written by Pedro, in tools/PipeLib .
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.inf
mobi phil wrote:
> the problem is that often with some traces you go much faster than that
With an app running on my iPAQ through rsh, I can see its stdout/stderr just
fine on my Linux.
Danny
Danny Backx - danny.backx - at scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-
On Thursday 08 October 2009 11:56:04, Vincent R. wrote:
> For instance here is what happens in other mingw families :
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin-patc...@cygwin.com/msg04531.html
I see, in other mingw families, volunteers step up to fix
things. I guess we need more of those, eh? ;-)
Hi everybody,
I can see for some time now that mingw/cygwin/binutils is progressing a
lot in the PE format support/
relocation/unicode startup but mingw32ce that belongs to cygwin/mingw
family doesn't benefit from it.
For instance here is what happens in other mingw families :
http://www.mail-ar
