Re: [Cegcc-devel] problem in prologue and environ

2008-09-17 Thread Pawel Veselov
Hi, On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2008 02:56:47, Pawel Veselov wrote: >> Argh, took me a find out what's going on. Will need some more time to >> actually produce a fix. Discovered all that while testing the changes >> to the tra

Re: [Cegcc-devel] gdb 6.8 success

2008-09-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:17:59, Danny Backx wrote: >> One of the last messages I found from you about gdb said you still had >> some work that wasn't committed. I don't know what it was about. This >> made me believe it wasn't entirely done, but yo

Re: [Cegcc-devel] problem in prologue and environ

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Thursday 18 September 2008 02:56:47, Pawel Veselov wrote: > Argh, took me a find out what's going on. Will need some more time to > actually produce a fix. Discovered all that while testing the changes > to the tracer. AFAIK, you should be able to debug cegcc.dll with gdbserver, cuz gdbserver.e

[Cegcc-devel] problem in prologue and environ

2008-09-17 Thread Pawel Veselov
Argh, took me a find out what's going on. Will need some more time to actually produce a fix. Discovered all that while testing the changes to the tracer. The application has a good chance crashing in prologue, if it's being attached to an existing process group. I guess those are the reasons I fo

[Cegcc-devel] Updating the webpages from the svn sources

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
Hi Danny, I seem to have forgotten. What was the magic button we had to push to update the webpages from the svn copy? Was it a cron job in your account, or was it a manual process? I've made a change to the frontpage a few days ago, and it still isn't visible (revision 1174, BTW). -- Pedro

Re: [Cegcc-devel] [Cegcc-svn] SF.net SVN: cegcc:[1172] trunk/cegcc/src/mingw

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Thursday 04 September 2008 19:45:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Revision: 1172 > http://cegcc.svn.sourceforge.net/cegcc/?rev=1172&view=rev > Author: dannybackx > Date: 2008-09-04 18:45:10 + (Thu, 04 Sep 2008) > > Log Message: > --- > Don't define getenv and system.

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fwd: arm-wince-cegcc on Windows Mobile 6.1

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Thursday 11 September 2008 10:56:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is an incompatibility between cegcc generated code and PE loader in > recent Windows Mobile 6.1. > Workaround is to change a key in registry : > > You can add a DWORD registry entry in > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\Loader\Load

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Missing header files, missing defi nes, incorrect define

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Sunday 07 September 2008 06:07:00, John Wharington wrote: > Well, that's pretty much what I had to do --- edit the header file. > I *do* have _WIN32_WCE defined as well as _WIN32_IE.   Ok, I was really answearing Danny's question, not yours. :-) > Are you suggesting that _WIN32_IE should *not

Re: [Cegcc-devel] gdb 6.8 success

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
Sorry, ENOPATCH, (that's against current GDB head, but should be easy to adjust to 6.8 if it doesn't apply) On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:22:10, Pedro Alves wrote: > Sorry for the delay, > > On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:19:07, Danny Backx wrote: > > When using the gdb we now have i cegcc sv

Re: [Cegcc-devel] gdb 6.8 success

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:17:59, Danny Backx wrote: > One of the last messages I found from you about gdb said you still had > some work that wasn't committed. I don't know what it was about. This > made me believe it wasn't entirely done, but your reply now indicates > that it is. Are there s

Re: [Cegcc-devel] gdb 6.8 success

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
Sorry for the delay, On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:19:07, Danny Backx wrote: > When using the gdb we now have i cegcc svn, I used the automatic file > transfer (over synce) a lot. Is that possible with this version of gdb > too ? Not automatically, no, sorry. gdbserver doesn't use RAPI at all.

Re: [Cegcc-devel] current compiler optimization alert

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Thursday 11 September 2008 19:39:08, Pawel Veselov wrote: > I've been playing around with compiling PHP and such. With default > compilation flags, (O3 is it?) the Zend would just SIGSEGV at random > locations. O0 cleared all the problems. So, may be, switching to a > newer gcc has certain weig

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fail to compile gdb

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 20:14:52, Pawel Veselov wrote: > I get this every now and then on some "stuck" applications: > > Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. > 0x8001b6ec in ?? () > (gdb) where > #0 0x8001b6ec in ?? () > (gdb) info threads > * 1 Thread 1154900630 0x8001b

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fail to compile gdb

2008-09-17 Thread Pawel Veselov
I get this every now and then on some "stuck" applications: Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. 0x8001b6ec in ?? () (gdb) where #0 0x8001b6ec in ?? () (gdb) info threads * 1 Thread 1154900630 0x8001b6ec in ?? () warning: Couldn't restore frame in current thread, at frame 0 0x

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fail to compile gdb

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
On Saturday 13 September 2008 05:51:24, Danny Backx wrote: > Are the issues you refer to (can't get info on threads etc) known gdb > issues ? What issues were those exactly? You should be able to list threads, get backtraces, and interrupt the running program with ^C normally. What exactly isn't

[Cegcc-devel] Email address updated

2008-09-17 Thread Pedro Alves
Hi guys, Just a quick note to say that I'm changing my email address. If you sent me private messages to the pedro_alves at portugalmail.pt or pedroalves at users.sourceforge.net addresses in the last few weeks, I haven't received them, due to mail server problems. -- Pedro Alves -