On Sunday 07 September 2008 06:07:00, John Wharington wrote: > Well, that's pretty much what I had to do --- edit the header file. > I *do* have _WIN32_WCE defined as well as _WIN32_IE.
Ok, I was really answearing Danny's question, not yours. :-) > Are you suggesting that _WIN32_IE should *not* be defined? Yes, and no (because I can interpret the question in several ways :-)) I'm suggesting that it's value, or it being defined or not shouldn't affect any definition we care about in the headers. I was saying it is a bug in the headers, and that people shouldn't rely on _WIN32_IE on WinCE, but instead, should report and fix those bugs. I'm saying that telling people to define _WIN32_IE keep propagating that problem. > So it's OK, I can compile OK once I've edited the header file. I've > reported this just so the public releases of cegcc mingw can have the > correct stuff in the header file. Thanks for doing that! Now we only need to fix. :-) BTW, FYI, patches + references to MSDN are the nicest ways to report these matters. -- Pedro Alves ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
