Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the
>> memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical
>> to this application).
>
> in that case, as I compiled zlib and libjpeg w
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>> So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use
>> mingw32ce instead of cegcc ?
>>
>>
>
> I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the memory
> allocator in newlib for my applicat
Hi,
I have started to report cegcc modifications and I have almost finished.
The problem is about modifications in the following files :
gcc\config\arm\ieee754-df.S
gcc\config\arm\ieee754-sf.S
gcc\config\arm\lib1funcs.asm
gcc/config/arm/arm.c
gcc/config/arm/arm.h
gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h
gcc/c
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>> So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use
>> mingw32ce instead of cegcc ?
>>
>>
>
> I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the memory
> allocator in newlib for my applicat
Danny Backx wrote:
> So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use
> mingw32ce instead of cegcc ?
>
>
I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the
memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical to
this application).
See thi
