On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote: >> So I'd ask any newcomer the question : is it really that hard to use >> mingw32ce instead of cegcc ? >> >> > > I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the memory > allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical to this > application). > > See this thread: > http://www.mail-archive.com/cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00864.html > > I can compile with the mingw32ce version, but it just runs too slow, and I > have not as yet managed to fix this by using the allocator directly or by > using special allocators. in addition to a specific allocator, is it good to have also a specific code for memcpy and memset ? I did some tests on my ipaq h3970 and the asm code of memcpy i have tested from glibc [1] is faster than what is in the cegcc newlib. Vincent Torri [1] http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysdeps/arm/memcpy.S?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=glibc ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
