On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 13:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So I will personnaly use my "cegcc-4.1.2" but I don't want to interfere in
> cegcc development, that's why
> I do not recommend to use my version.
> I will stop to talk about it because I agree it wouldn't be a good idea to
> have anoth
Thanks but I prefer to stay as a developper and user.
For now I don't have enough experience in GCC development, I am still in a
learning phase
Actually if I hadn't encoutered some issues with cegcc-4.1.0 when building
D compiler I would never have tried
to generate a different version of cegcc and
Or perhaps you could join our fine developers in the project? Perhaps an
invitation from them would be in order? :)
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:25, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can stop posting here and work on my own ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:25:25 +0200, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTE
I can stop posting here and work on my own ;-)
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:25:25 +0200, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've been silent for a while on this topic, partially because I was
> busy, also because you looked like you were having fun :-)
>
> I wouldn't want to see this grow in
