I can stop posting here and work on my own ;-)
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:25:25 +0200, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been silent for a while on this topic, partially because I was > busy, also because you looked like you were having fun :-) > > I wouldn't want to see this grow into a fork of the project. > > What can we do to avoid that ? > > Danny > > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 18:31 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hurray! >> >> I have discovered that in fact when regenerating configure in GCC you > need >> to use >> autoconf 2.13 for top level makefile and autoconf 2.59 for others. >> Now everything compiles fine and installation is OK. >> >> Waiting for your tests ... >> >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Cegcc-devel mailing list >> Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
