Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
>>> Crosswords, compiled with cegcc, runs noticably slower than compiled
>>> with the m$ compiler. Eric House also reported this. I've not
>>> investigated this yet. We may have inefficiencies other than the code
>>> generat
This is stuff required to compile services. Information gathered from
http://nah6.com/~itsme/cvs-xdadevtools/dumprom/parsecrash.pl (list of
file_device_types),
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa914767.aspx ,
http://www.pocketpcjunkies.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/pocketpc-dev/7975/IR-application-on-
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
> > Crosswords, compiled with cegcc, runs noticably slower than compiled
> > with the m$ compiler. Eric House also reported this. I've not
> > investigated this yet. We may have inefficiencies other than the code
> > generated by the compiler. Some
Danny Backx a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
>
I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsof
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:51 +0200, pgeorges wrote:
> >> I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
> >> number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
> >> ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsoft
> >> compilers.
> Playing
Pedro Alves a écrit :
> pgeorges wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ported some chess engines to Pocket PC with cegecc and noticed the
>> number of calculated positions per second is about 30% lower with my
>> ports than the equivalent made by other people who used Microsoft
>> compilers.
>> Years ago I made
